Volume 15 Issue 2
Aug.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Jian-xing, YOU Jia, TIAN Ming-fei. Influence of different implant simulation software on the accuracy of surgical template[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2017, 15(2): 192-194,345. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.02.003
Citation: ZHANG Jian-xing, YOU Jia, TIAN Ming-fei. Influence of different implant simulation software on the accuracy of surgical template[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2017, 15(2): 192-194,345. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.02.003

Influence of different implant simulation software on the accuracy of surgical template

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.02.003
  • Received Date: 2016-03-18
    Available Online: 2022-08-05
  • Objective To evaluate the influence of different dental implant simulation software on the accuracy of surgical template. Methods Sixteen healthy people were chosen for the analysis.All the patients were scanned with cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) and the data were imported into the different dental implant simulation software,53 implants were planned and the stereolithographic (SLA) surgical templates were made with the technology of SLA.The surgical templates designed by Simplant were group A,designed by 6D implant were group B.A CBCT scan of the surgical template fitted on plaster model was performed,and the images were matched with the virtual implant plan images,the actual implant position was acquired from the position of surgical template.The deviation between the actual and planned implant position was analyzed. Results Group A:the deviation at the hex was (0.582±0.216) mm,horizontal deviation was (0.226±0.132) mm,vertical deviation was (0.522±0.213) mm;apex deviation was (0.643±0.256) mm,horizontal deviation was (0.332±0.222) mm,vertical deviation was (0.524±0.214) mm;contact radio was (88.7±4.6)%.Group B:the deviation at the hex was (0.456±0.222) mm,horizontal deviation was (0.193±0.123) mm,vertical deviation was (0.388±0.238) mm;apex deviation was (0.515±0.233) mm,horizontal deviation was (0.277±0.19) mm,vertical deviation was (0.39±0.236) mm;contact radio was (91.1±4.0)%. Conclusion The influence of different implant simulation software on the accuracy has statistical significance.

     

  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (227) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return