Volume 19 Issue 8
Aug.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of General Practice  > 2021  >  19(8): 1411-1414,1432
CHAI Xian-deng, LI Lun-lan, YANG Gui-fang, LI Yang, SUN Bin. The effect of oral lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage combined with sodium phosphate in colonoscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(8): 1411-1414,1432. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002073
Citation: CHAI Xian-deng, LI Lun-lan, YANG Gui-fang, LI Yang, SUN Bin. The effect of oral lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage combined with sodium phosphate in colonoscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(8): 1411-1414,1432. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002073
shu

The effect of oral lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage combined with sodium phosphate in colonoscopy

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002073
  • 1.

    Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230022, China

Funds:

 61976007

  • Received Date: 2021-02-04
    Available Online: 2022-02-16
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To explore the application effect of oral lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage combined with sodium phosphate solution in bowel preparation in common colonoscopy and to improve the efficiency and quality of colonoscopy.  Methods  Total 293 patients who underwent general colonoscopy in our hospital from April to June 2020 were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table method, including 145 cases in the experimental group and 148 cases in the control group. The patients in the control group used the traditional method of taking sodium phosphate in two doses for bowel preparation. The patients in the experimental group were given 20 mL lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage 4-6 hours before the examination on the basis of the control group. Morisky Medication Compliance Scale, Boston Bowel Intestinal Preparation Scale, Bubble Score, and Pain Numerical Score were used to compare the medication compliance, cleanliness of intestinal preparation, intestinal bubble score, and the degree of pain during the examination between the two groups of patients.  Results  There were no significant difference in medication compliance, intestinal cleanliness, pain degree, and polyp detection rate between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05). The score of the intestinal bubble score of the test group was (2.57±0.69) points, which was higher than the score of the control group [(2.24±0.78) points], and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.833, P < 0.001). The time to withdraw the lens in the experimental group was (6.82±1.23) minutes, which was less than (7.88±1.77) minutes in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=5.941, P < 0.001).  Conclusion  The intestinal preparation method of oral lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage combined with sodium phosphate can effectively reduce the amount of bubbles in the intestine, shorten the time of colonoscopy, and improve the efficiency and quality of colonoscopy.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(21)
  • [1]
    FACCIORUSSO A, ANTONINO M, DI MASO M, et al. Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms: Classification, therapy and follow-up[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(17): 5149-5157. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5149
    [2]
    ABOU FADEL C G, SHAYTO R H, SHARARA A I. Optimizing colonoscopy quality: From bowel preparation to surveillance[J]. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol, 2016, 14(1): 115-127. doi: 10.1007/s11938-016-0073-3
    [3]
    宋群容. 口服磷酸钠盐与聚乙二醇在肠息肉电切术中的肠道清洁效果比较[J]. 四川医学, 2018, 39(6): 674-676. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCYX201806022.htm
    [4]
    ZHANG S, ZHENG D, WANG J, et al. Simethicone improves bowel cleansing with low-volume polyethylene glycol: A multicenter randomized trial[J]. Endoscopy, 2018, 50(4): 412-422. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121337
    [5]
    王丽, 林香春, 张蕾, 等. 二甲硅油联合聚乙二醇电解质用于结肠镜肠道准备: 单盲随机对照研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2019, 19(9): 773-777. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2019.09.002
    [6]
    张琼英, 王瑜, 李小青, 等. 不同浓度利多卡因胶浆在普通胃镜检查中麻醉、祛泡效果的随机对照研究[J]. 四川医学, 2017, 38(7): 721-723. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCYX201707004.htm
    [7]
    MORISKY D E, ANG A, KROUSEL-WOOD M, et al. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting[J]. J Clin Hypertens(Greenwich), 2008, 10(5): 348-354. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x
    [8]
    LAI E J, CALDERWOOD A H, DOROS G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: A valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 69(3): 620-625. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057
    [9]
    YOO I K, LEE J S, CHUN H J, et al. A randomized, prospective trial on efficacy and tolerability of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2015, 47(2): 131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.10.019
    [10]
    杨成, 项立, 赵新华, 等. 结肠镜退镜时间的研究现状及思考[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2016, 33(8): 512-513. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2016.08.002
    [11]
    CAMACHO S. Evidence-based and patient-centered medicine with shared decision improves colonoscopy efficacy in poor bowel preparation patients[J]. J Invest Surg, 2020, 33(5): 466-467. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1526989
    [12]
    王田田, 尤丽丽. 结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(2): 223-230. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202102007.htm
    [13]
    占俊, 汤进芝, 汪文生, 等. 不同剂型聚乙二醇电解质在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用比较[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(8): 1283-1286. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202008011.htm
    [14]
    唐川君, 李小青, 兰慧, 等. 不同时间口服磷酸钠盐液对肠道清洁的效果评价[J]. 西部医学, 2018, 30(10): 1539-1541, 1546. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.2018.10.033
    [15]
    娄青玲, 高峰. 盐酸达克罗宁胶浆在肠镜检查中去泡效果的单中心随机对照研究[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017, 34(8): 582-585. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2017.08.010
    [16]
    纪丽, 白姣姣, 顾幼敏, 等. 结肠镜检查前肠道清洁效果及影响因素调查分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2015, 30(24): 33-35. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2015.24.033
    [17]
    刘晶婧, 李牧虹, 冯跃, 等. PPT结合微信视频宣教在老年住院患者结肠镜检查准备中的应用效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2020, 39(17): 3240-3244. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20190506-01001
    [18]
    张京蕾, 周鸿. 基于电视平台的术前教育在肠镜检查患者肠道准备中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020, 26(21): 2914-2917. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20191130-04357
    [19]
    杨文博, 李红, 何利平. 结肠镜检查等待时间对患者肠道准备质量的影响研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(10): 1452-1457. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.10.002
    [20]
    宋燕, 阮春凤, 汪景丽, 等. 步行运动在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的应用[J]. 上海护理, 2018, 18(3): 40-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2018.03.012
    [21]
    何小建, 李海涛, 柳刚, 等. 复合分光染色内镜与普通内镜结肠息肉检出率的对比研究[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2020, 37(10): 742-744. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20190709-00417
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (471) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Address：No. 287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui Province, 233004, P.R.ChinaphoneNo：0552-3066635； 0552-3051890Email：zhqkyx@163.com

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of General Practice皖ICP备2020018345号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return