Volume 15 Issue 7
Aug.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
BAO Hongyu, WANG Jianning, MENG Qingqi, SONG Min. Expression of S100A6 in AML and Its Influence no Curative Effect[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2017, 15(7): 1117-1119,1126. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.07.007
Citation: BAO Hongyu, WANG Jianning, MENG Qingqi, SONG Min. Expression of S100A6 in AML and Its Influence no Curative Effect[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2017, 15(7): 1117-1119,1126. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.07.007

Expression of S100A6 in AML and Its Influence no Curative Effect

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.07.007
  • Received Date: 2016-09-18
    Available Online: 2022-08-04
  • Objective To investigate the expression of S100A6 in AML and its influence no curative effect. Methods Collecting 42 AML patients and 12 normal persons, the expression of S100A6 mRNA in these AML patients was determined by real time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR).The expressions in AML patients and normal persons, different types AML patients, the patients before and after the therapy were compared.The expression differences before and after the therapy between the effective treatment group and the ineffective treatment group of AML-M3, M4, M5 patients were compared.The expression differences before the therapy between the recurrence group within two years and the no recurrence group within two years of AML-M3, M4, M5 patients were compared.The expression differences of CR1, CR2 between the high expression group and the low expression group of AML-M3, M4, M5 patients were compared.The expression differences of OS in two years between the high expression group and the low expression group of AML-M3, M4, M5 patients were compared.The expression differences of relapse between the high expression group and the low expression group of AML-M3, M4, M5 patients were compared.All the results were analyzed by statistic. Results Compared with normal persons, the expression lever of S100A6 in the AML-M3, M4, M5 patients was higher (P < 0.05), the expression lever in the AML-M1, M2, M6, M7 patients was not different (P > 0.05).The expression of S100A6 in the AML-M3, M4, M5 patients who have effective treatment has difference between before and after therapy (P < 0.05), the expression of S100A6 in these patients who have no effective treatment has no difference between before and after therapy (P > 0.05).The expression of S100A6 in the AML-M3, M4, M5 patients who relapsed in two years was higher than that in the patients who have not relapsed in two years (P < 0.05).The rate of CR1 and CR2 in the S100A6 high expression group is no statistical difference with the rate of the low expression group of AML-M3, M4, M5 patients (P > 0.05).The rate of OS in two years in the S100A6 high expression group is no statistical difference with the low expression group of AML-M3, M4, M5 patients (P > 0.05).The rate of relapse in the S100A6 high expression group is higher than that of low expression group of AML-M3, M4, M5 patients (P < 0.05). Conclusion The expression of S100A6 in AML patients is related to the patients' styles, curative effect and prognosis.It might be the diagnosis molecular markers of AML.

     

  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (228) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return