Volume 21 Issue 5
May  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHOU Haixian, JIN Weiwei, XU Qun, LIN Lejing, HU Yanjun. Clinical value of scoring system of postpartum hemorrhage in predicting postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women of different ages[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(5): 761-764. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002977
Citation: ZHOU Haixian, JIN Weiwei, XU Qun, LIN Lejing, HU Yanjun. Clinical value of scoring system of postpartum hemorrhage in predicting postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women of different ages[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(5): 761-764. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002977

Clinical value of scoring system of postpartum hemorrhage in predicting postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women of different ages

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002977
Funds:

 2021KY1080

  • Received Date: 2022-12-11
  •   Objective  To analyze the predictive value of scoring system of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in pregnant women of different ages, and provide reference for personalized assessment of PPH risk.  Methods  A total of 3 559 pregnant women who gave birth in Wenzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine from May 2019 to May 2022 were selected as subjects. According to age and whether the pregnant women were diagnosed with PPH, they were divided into PPH group (< 35 years old, 22 cases; ≥35 years old, 76 cases) and control group (< 35 years old, 44 cases; ≥35 years old, 152 cases). The scoring system of PPH was used to score pregnant women at admission, delivery and after delivery. The predictive value of scoring system of PPH in pregnant women aged < 35 years versus ≥35 years was analyzed.  Results  Prenatal score, postpartum score and total score all had predictive effects on PPH (P≤0.001), and area under curve (AUC) were 0.703, 0.796 and 0.806, respectively. The prenatal score, postpartum score and total score of pregnant women in PPH group (< 35 years old) were significantly higher than those in control group (< 35 years old, all P < 0.05). The prenatal score, postpartum score and total score of pregnant women in PPH group (≥35 years old) were significantly higher than those in control group (≥35 years old, all P < 0.05). In pregnant women < 35 years old, postpartum score and total score had predictive value for PPH (P < 0.001), AUC were 0.785 and 0.839, and the optimal cut-off value were 4 and 10 points, while prenatal score had no predictive value for PPH (P>0.05). In pregnant women age ≥35 years, prenatal score and total score had predictive value for PPH (P < 0.001), AUC were 0.786 and 0.881, and the optimal cut-off value were 6 and 7 points, while postpartum score had no predictive value for PPH (all P>0.05).  Conclusion  Scoring system of PPH has a good predictive effect on PPH. The cut-off values of the scores are different for pregnant women < 35 years old and ≥35 years old.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    LIANG J, LI X, KANG C, et al. Maternal mortality ratios in 2 852 Chinese counties, 1996-2015, and achievement of millennium development goal 5 in China: a subnational analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016[J]. The Lancet, 2019, 393(10168): 241-252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31712-4
    [2]
    EVENSEN A, ANDERSON J M, FONTAINE P. Postpartum hemorrhage: prevention and treatment[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2017, 95(7): 442-449.
    [3]
    颜建英, 黄科华, 刘青闽, 等. 产后出血危险因素及高危评分系统临床价值研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2014, 30 (10) : 791-797. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGSF201410020.htm

    YAN J Y, HUANG K H, LIU Q M, et al. Clinical study of risk factors of postpartum hemorrahge and risk evaluation system[J]. Chinese Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014, 30 (10) : 791-797. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGSF201410020.htm
    [4]
    尹宗智, 杨媛媛, 张英, 等. 生育政策调整对产妇年龄构成及产后出血发生率的影响[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2018, 27(2): 137-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDFC201802015.htm

    YIN Z Z, YANG Y Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Effects of birth policy adjustment on maternal age composition and incidence of postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Advances in Modern Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018, 27(2): 137-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDFC201802015.htm
    [5]
    中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 产后出血预防与处理指南(2014)[J]. 中国实用乡村医生杂志, 2015, (10): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHFY201504002.htm

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage (2014)[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Rural Doctors, 2015, (10): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHFY201504002.htm
    [6]
    SALMERI N, PAPALE M, MONTRESOR C, et al. Uterine arteriovenous malformation (UAVM) as a rare cause of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH): a literature review[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 306(6): 1873-1884. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06498-0
    [7]
    泮梦娜, 任静. 经阴道分娩初产妇产后出血的高危因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(4): 875-877. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB202104046.htm

    PAN M N, REN J. Analysis of high risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage in primipara during vaginal delivery[J]. China Maternal and Child Health, 2021, 36(4): 875-877. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB202104046.htm
    [8]
    VITNER D, BLEICHER I, KADOUR-PEEROA E, et al. Does prenatal identification of fetal macrosomia change management and outcome[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 299(3): 635-644. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-5003-2
    [9]
    劳永霞, 伍伶俐, 萧志辉. 瘢痕子宫患者产后出血的危险因素及D-二聚体的预测价值分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2022, 31(6): 50-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKXZ202206014.htm

    LUO Y X, WU L L, XIAO Z H. Risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with cicatricial uterus and prediction value of D-dimer[J]. Chinese Journal of Sex Science, 2022, 31(6): 50-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKXZ202206014.htm
    [10]
    LIU C N, XU Y Z, LI J S, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for severe postpartum hemorrhage in women undergoing vaginal delivery: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Gynecol obstet, 2021, 157(2): 353-358.
    [11]
    张方林. 产科检查[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2001: 40.

    ZHANG F L. Obstetrical examination[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2001: 40.
    [12]
    洪训宇, 孙慧聪. 产后出血相关危险因素分析及预测评分表的临床应用价值[J]. 现代实用医学, 2020, 32(6): 679-681. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NBYX202006037.htm

    HONG X Y, SUN H C. Analysis of risk factors related to postpartum hemorrhage and clinical application value of prediction and evaluation scale[J]. Modern Practical Medicine, 2020, 32(6): 679-681. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NBYX202006037.htm
    [13]
    李刚辉, 韩振艳, 张媛, 等. 改良产后出血预测评分表在阴道分娩中的预测价值[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(2): 99-104.

    LI G H, HAN Z Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Prediction value of improved postpartum hemorrhage evaluation scale in vaginal delivery[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrical Emergency, 2022, 11(2): 99-104.
    [14]
    王海娜, 顾优飞, 陆静静, 等. 310例高龄产妇生育现状、并发症及妊娠不良结局分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(4): 609-611. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001310

    WANG H N, GU Y F, LU J J, et al. Analysis of fertility status, complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in 310 cases of advanced maternal age[J]. Chinese Journal of General Medicine, 2020, 18(4): 609-611. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001310
    [15]
    黎思健. 中国人群产后出血的发生率及其危险因素[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2021.

    LI S J. Incidence and risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage in Chinese population[D]. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College, 2021.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (196) PDF downloads(15) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return