Volume 19 Issue 9
Sep.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of General Practice  > 2021  >  19(9): 1439-1441,1446
WANG Wen-bin, ZHAN Yan-qing, HAN Long, LI Yang-yang, LI Yong-sheng. Efficacy and prognosis of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with iliac vein stenting for deep vein thrombosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1439-1441,1446. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002080
Citation: WANG Wen-bin, ZHAN Yan-qing, HAN Long, LI Yang-yang, LI Yong-sheng. Efficacy and prognosis of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with iliac vein stenting for deep vein thrombosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1439-1441,1446. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002080
shu

Efficacy and prognosis of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with iliac vein stenting for deep vein thrombosis

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002080
  • 1.

    Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230000, China

Funds:

 81500373

 202004j07020035

 1608085MH193

  • Received Date: 2020-08-25
    Available Online: 2022-02-15
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To compare the efficacy between catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with iliac vein stent implantation and peripheral thrombolysis in the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis with iliac vein stenosis.   Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis combined with iliac vein stenosis in our institution from December 2014 to December 2019. A total of 42 cases were included in this study, 15 of which underwent peripheral thrombolysis (systematic thrombolysis group) and 27 of which received catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with iliac vein stenting (catheter-directed thrombolysis group). Clinical data including complications, effective rate of thrombolysis and incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome were collected and compared between the two groups.   Results  The thrombolytic doses of the systemic thrombolysis group and catheter-directed thrombolysis group were (3.35±1.34) and (3.04±1.16) million U, respectively. Three patients in the systematic thrombolysis group and two patients in the catheter-directed thrombolysis group had complications. No significant difference was observed in the thrombolytic dose and complication rate between the two groups (all P>0.05); the effective rate of thrombolysis in the systemic thrombolytic group was 53.33%, whilst the rate was 88.89% in the catheter-directed thrombolysis group, which was higher than that in the systematic thrombolysis group (P < 0.05). The average Villalta score of the systematic thrombolysis group was 2.53 points, and that of the catheter-directed thrombolysis group was 1.77 points. The incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome was lower in the catheter-directed thrombolysis group than in the systematic thrombolysis group (P < 0.01). In addition, the VEINES-QOL/Sym scores in the systematic thrombolysis group were 35.33 and 32.67 points, whilst those in the catheter-directed thrombolysis group were 49.00 and 45.67 points. The scores were significantly higher in the catheter-directed thrombolysis group than in the systematic thrombolysis group (P < 0.01).   Conclusion  Catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with iliac vein stent has a better curative effect for patients with deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities with iliac vein stenosis.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    李晓强, 张福先, 王深明. 深静脉血栓形成的诊断和治疗指南(第三版)[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(4): 250-257. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7429.2017.04.003
    [2]
    陈世远, 高涌, 聂中林, 等. 介入联合手术治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成[J]. 中华全科医学, 2010, 8(3): 288-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201003011.htm
    [3]
    MING Z B, LI W D, YUAN R F, et al. Effectiveness of catheter directed thrombolysis and stent implantation on iliofemoral vein thrombosis caused by iliac vein compression[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2017, 44(2): 254-260. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1515-z
    [4]
    ALESH I, KAYALI F, STEIN P D. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (intrathrombus injection) in treatment of deep venous thrombosis: A systematic review[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007, 70(1): 143-148. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000033793184710_68eb.html
    [5]
    DU X L, KONG L S, MENG Q Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of low dosage of urokinase for catheter-directed thrombolysis of deep venous thrombosis[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2015, 128(13): 1787-1792. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.159355
    [6]
    赵国瑞, 任建庄, 段旭华, 等. 腔内介入治疗Cockett综合征伴左下肢深静脉血栓形成[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2017, 26(6): 522-526. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2017.06.011
    [7]
    王孝运, 段鹏飞, 倪才方. 下肢深静脉血栓形成伴髂静脉狭窄支架植入与否近中期临床疗效比较[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27(12): 1140-1143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2018.12.005
    [8]
    杨继武, 王辉, 廖向群. 急性下肢深静脉血栓导管溶栓后髂静脉狭窄的支架治疗[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(1): 62-63.
    [9]
    SANG H, LI X, QIAN A, et al. Outcome of endovascular treatment in postthrombotic syndrome[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2014, 28(6): 1493-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.03.031
    [10]
    ENDEN T, HAIG Y, KLØW N E, et al. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): A randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9810): 31-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61753-4
    [11]
    GOPAL M, HWANG S, VOUYOUKA A, et al. Lessons learned from reinterventions after vein stent placements[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 72(1): e171.
    [12]
    BOZKAYA H, CINAR C, ERTUGAY S, et al. Endovascular treatment of iliac vein compression (May-Thurner) syndrome: Angioplasty and stenting with or without manual aspiration thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis[J]. Ann Vasc Dis, 2015, 8(1): 21-28. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.14-00110
    [13]
    MURPHY E H, JOHNS B, VARNEY E, et al. Deep venous thrombosis associated with caval extension of iliac stents[J]. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2017, 5(1): 8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.09.002
    [14]
    张袁骕, 梅统, 陈金晖, 等. 深静脉血栓患者经机械吸栓治疗后的生活质量分析[J]. 中国基层医药, 2020, 27(12): 1495-1498. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2020.12.020
    [15]
    刘澄, 李晓强. 髂静脉闭塞支架治疗的现状[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 11(3): 165-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XGWK201903002.htm
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(3)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (249) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Address：No. 287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui Province, 233004, P.R.ChinaphoneNo：0552-3066635； 0552-3051890Email：zhqkyx@163.com

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of General Practice皖ICP备2020018345号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return