Volume 19 Issue 4
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of General Practice  > 2021  >  19(4): 599-602
YING Xiao-wen, TANG Gen-fu, SHU Ji, HU Chuan-qi, ZHANG Xu, XU Ya-ping. SF-12 and EQ-5D scale in evaluating the quality of life of elderly hypertensive patients in rural areas of Lianyungang City[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(4): 599-602. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001871
Citation: YING Xiao-wen, TANG Gen-fu, SHU Ji, HU Chuan-qi, ZHANG Xu, XU Ya-ping. SF-12 and EQ-5D scale in evaluating the quality of life of elderly hypertensive patients in rural areas of Lianyungang City[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(4): 599-602. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001871
shu

SF-12 and EQ-5D scale in evaluating the quality of life of elderly hypertensive patients in rural areas of Lianyungang City

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001871
  • 1.

    School of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China

Funds:

 81773534

  • Received Date: 2020-09-22
    Available Online: 2022-02-16
    Abstract
  •   Objective  This study aimed to compare the results of the SF-12 and EQ-5D scale in evaluating the quality of life of elderly hypertensive patients in rural areas of Lianyungang City.  Methods  The SF-12 scale and EQ-5D scale were used to evaluate the quality of life of 1 262 elderly hypertensive patients in rural areas of Lianyungang City. T-test, one-way analysis of variance and other statistical methods were used to compare the results, and the physiology of SF-12 was analysed. Pearson correlations amongst the physical component score (PCS), mental component score (MCS), EQ-5D index score and EQ-VAS score were tested.  Results  The 1 262 elderly hypertensive patients surveyed had a total SF-12, PCS, MCS, EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS scores of 70.35±20.57, 66.11±25.21, 74.59±22.55, 0.77±0.10 and 69.22±18.91, respectively. The EQ-5D index score and EQ-VAS score corresponding to different SF-12 score ranges are different (all P < 0.001). PCS and MCS corresponding to different levels in different dimensions were significantly different (all P < 0.001). PCS was strongly correlated with the EQ-5D index score (r=0.632, P < 0.001) and moderately correlated with EQ-VAS score (r=0.442, P < 0.001). Moreover, MCS was moderately correlated with the EQ-5D index score (r=0.467, P < 0.001) and weakly correlated with the EQ-VAS score (r=0.332, P < 0.001).  Conclusion  The SF-12 scale and EQ-5D scale can accurately indicate the quality of life of elderly hypertensive patients, and the results also have a certain correlation. However, EQ-5D has an evident ceiling effect, and SF-12 is more sensitive.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    卢祖询, 姜润生. 社会医学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 179.
    [2]
    王海棠, 任利民, 刘瑶, 等. SF-12健康调查量表的评价研究现状[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2015, 14(7): 574-576. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2015.07.025
    [3]
    World Health Organization. China country assessment report on ageing and health[R/OL]. Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2015: 1-6. [2020-06-20]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/194271/9789241509312_eng.pdf.
    [4]
    李苏宁, 陈祚, 王增武, 等. 我国老年人高血压现状分析[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2019, 27(2): 140-148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGZ201902012.htm
    [5]
    中国老年医学学会高血压分会. 中国老年高血压管理指南2019[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2019, 18(2): 81-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLQG201902001.htm
    [6]
    DE SMEDT D, CLAYS E, ANNEMANS L, et al. EQ-5D versus SF-12 in coronary patients: are they interchangeable?[J]. Value Health, 2014, 17(1): 84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.010
    [7]
    杜旭东, 朱萍, 李宓儿, 等. EQ-5D和SF-6D测量脑卒中患者健康效用值的比较[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2018, 49(2): 252-257. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYK201802021.htm
    [8]
    刘畅. 基于三种通用型生命质量量表的慢性盆腔炎人群生命质量的比较研究[D]. 北京: 北京中医药大学, 2019.
    [9]
    边原, 冯双, 龙恩武, 等. 基于EQ-5D量表的高血压患者生命质量评价及其用药现状[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2017, 36(3): 166-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYYL201703010.htm
    [10]
    李明晖, 罗南. 欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)中文版应用介绍[J]. 中国药物经济学, 2009, 4(1): 49-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5846.2009.01.007
    [11]
    职心乐, 胡良平. 调查研究中的问卷和量表的设计与编制要领[J]. 四川精神卫生, 2017, 30(5): 405-409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WANT201705004.htm
    [12]
    冉孟冬, 刘冰清, 陈龙妹, 等. EQ-5D和SF-12评价脑卒中患者生命质量的比较[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2015, 46(1): 94-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYK201501021.htm
    [13]
    王晓娜, 孙卫卫, 闫润泽, 等. EQ-5D量表与SF-36量表在DKD患者生命质量评价中的应用[J]. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志, 2020, 21(1): 28-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-587X.2020.01.009
    [14]
    国家卫生计生委统计信息中心. 2013第五次国家卫生服务调查分析报告[R/OL]. 2016: 29. (2016-10-26)[2020-06-20]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/ewebeditor/uploadfile/2016/10/20161026163512679.pdf.
    [15]
    KONNOPKA A, KOENING H H. The "no problems"-problem: an empirical analysis of ceiling effects on the EQ-5D 5L[J]. Qual Life Res, 2017, 26(8): 2079-2084. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1551-3
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (307) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Address：No. 287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui Province, 233004, P.R.ChinaphoneNo：0552-3066635； 0552-3051890Email：zhqkyx@163.com

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of General Practice皖ICP备2020018345号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return