Nursing effect of MDT model health education combined with out-of-hospital continuous intervention on patients with modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer
-
摘要:
目的 探讨多学科协作(MDT)模式健康教育联合院外延续性干预对乳腺癌改良根治术患者的干预效果。 方法 选取2020年6月—2022年6月张家口市第一医院收治的114例乳腺癌改良根治术患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将患者分为常规组(57例,常规健康教育)和MDT组(57例,MDT模式健康教育),2组出院后随访6个月,期间均行院外延续性干预。比较2组并发症、住院情况、心理状况、健康行为、健康知识评分、肩关节功能恢复情况、遵医行为。 结果 MDT组术后并发症发生率(10.53%,6/57)低于常规组[24.56%(14/57),χ2=9.860,P=0.002];MDT组住院时间短于常规组,住院费用少于常规组(P < 0.05)。随访6个月后,MDT组抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分低于常规组; 健康促进生活方式评定量表(HPLS-Ⅱ)和健康知识评分高于常规组(P < 0.05)。随访6个月,2组患肢肩关节活动正常者占比高于常规组(P < 0.05)。随访期间,MDT组各项遵医行为评分均高于常规组(P < 0.05)。 结论 MDT模式健康教育联合院外延续性干预可提高乳腺癌改良根治术患者对健康知识的掌握情况、遵医行为及健康行为水平,改善其心理状态,促进肩关节功能恢复,缩短住院时间,减少住院费用。 Abstract:Objective To explore the intervention effect of multidisciplinary collaboration (MDT) model health education combined with out-of-hospital continuous intervention on patients with modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Methods A total of 114 patients with modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer admitted to Zhangjiakou First Hospital from June 2020 to June 2022 were selected as the research objects. The patients were divided into routine group (57 cases, routine health education) and MDT group (57 cases, MDT mode health education) by random number table method. The two groups were followed up for 6 months after discharge, during which continuous intervention outside the hospital was performed. The complications, hospitalization, psychological status, health behavior, health knowledge score, shoulder joint function recovery and compliance behavior were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of postoperative complications in the MDT group (10.53%, 6/57) was lower than that in the conventional group [24.56% (14/57), χ2=9.860, P=0.002]. The hospitalization time of the MDT group was shorter than that of the conventional group, and the hospitalization cost was less than that of the conventional group (P < 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the scores of self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) in the MDT group were lower than those in the conventional group; the health promotion lifestyle rating scale (HPLS-Ⅱ) and health knowledge score were higher than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the proportion of patients with normal shoulder joint activity in the two groups was higher than that in the routine group (P < 0.05). During the follow-up period, the scores of compliance behaviors in the MDT group were higher than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Conclusion MDT mode health education combined with continuous intervention outside the hospital can improve the mastery of health knowledge, compliance behavior and health behavior level of patients with modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, improve their psychological state, promote the recovery of shoulder joint function, shorten the hospitalization time and reduce the hospitalization cost. -
表 1 2组乳腺癌改良根治术患者术后并发症及住院情况比较
Table 1. Comparison of postoperative complications and hospitalization between two groups of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer
组别 例数 术后并发症[例(%)] 住院时间
(x±s, d)住院费用
(x±s, 万元)皮瓣坏死 上肢淋巴水肿 皮下积液 总发生 MDT组 57 0 4(7.02) 2(3.51) 6(10.53) 14.43±0.76 1.34±0.15 常规组 57 2(3.51) 8(14.04) 4(7.02) 14(24.56) 22.53±3.14 1.96±0.21 统计量 9.860a 18.929b 18.138b P值 0.002 < 0.001 < 0.001 注: a为χ2值,b为t值。 表 2 2组乳腺癌改良根治术患者心理状况及健康行为水平比较(x±s,分)
Table 2. Comparison of psychological status and health behavior levels between two groups of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer (x±s, points)
组别 例数 SDS SAS HPLS-Ⅱ 干预前 随访6个月 干预前 随访6个月 干预前 随访6个月 MDT组 57 58.87±3.54 34.54±1.54b 68.98±3.65 47.54±2.54b 102.65±12.54 176.65±10.76b 常规组 57 59.05±3.63 42.65±1.85b 69.06±3.72 58.54±2.62b 101.18±11.43 145.87±10.34b 统计量 0.268a 659.580c 0.116a 515.040c 0.654a 245.686c P值 0.789 < 0.001 0.908 < 0.001 0.514 < 0.001 注: a为t值,c为F值; 与同组干预前比较,bP < 0.05。 表 3 2组乳腺癌改良根治术患者健康知识评分比较(x±s,分)
Table 3. Comparison of health knowledge scores between two groups of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer(x±s, points)
组别 例数 疾病知识 化疗相关知识 术后功能锻炼 术后并发症的预防及治疗 复诊知识及饮食知识 乳房自查方法 干预前 随访6个月 干预前 随访6个月 干预前 随访6个月 干预前 随访6个月 干预前 随访6个月 干预前 随访6个月 MDT组 57 1.03±0.27 3.76±0.99b 1.43±0.21 3.97±1.02b 0.98±0.17 3.45±0.76b 1.56±0.76 3.58±0.87b 1.26±0.33 3.78±0.67b 1.45±0.25 4.03±0.45b 常规组 57 1.07±0.31 2.89±0.89b 1.39±0.30 2.74±0.95b 1.01±0.20 2.53±0.64b 1.71±0.81 2.87±0.96b 1.31±0.31 2.56±0.58b 1.39±0.35 2.93±0.36b 统计量 0.737a 23.026c 0.825a 48.374c 0.863a 53.261c 1.020a 17.643c 0.834a 111.442c 1.053a 225.751c P值 0.464 < 0.001 0.411 < 0.001 0.390 < 0.001 0.310 < 0.001 0.406 < 0.001 0.295 < 0.001 注: a为t值,c为F值; 与同组干预前比较,bP < 0.05。 表 4 2组乳腺癌改良根治术患者患肢肩关节功能恢复情况比较[例(%)]
Table 4. Comparison of shoulder joint function recovery in the affected limb between two groups of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer[cases (%)]
组别 例数 活动严重受限 活动受限 活动正常 MDT组 57 0 2(3.51) 55(96.49) 常规组 57 2(3.51) 7(12.28) 48(84.21) 注: 2组患肢肩关节活动正常比较, χ2=4.887, P=0.027。 表 5 2组乳腺癌改良根治术患者遵医行为比较(x±s,分)
Table 5. Comparison of compliance behavior between two groups of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer(x±s, points)
组别 例数 科学饮食 定期锻炼 按时服药 准时复诊 MDT组 57 23.54±0.58 24.04±0.39 23.15±0.45 23.15±0.64 常规组 57 16.54±0.93 16.65±0.87 16.65±0.96 16.98±0.87 t值 48.218 58.519 46.286 43.130 P值 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 -
[1] 殷发祥, 许睿, 谢强, 等. 翻转课堂联合MDT教学模式在住院医师规范化培训乳腺癌教学中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(8): 1420-1423. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003650YIN F X, XU R, XIE Q, et al. The application of flipped classroom combined with mdt teaching model in the standardized training of breast cancer residents[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(8): 1420-1423. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003650 [2] 陆亿娴, 余晶晶, 刘红, 等. 知信行健康教育模式对乳腺癌患者术后的应用效果研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(11): 1901-1904. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002196LU Y X, YU J J, LIU H, et al. Research on the application effect of the knowledge, belief and practice health education model on breast cancer patients after surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(11): 1901-1904. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002196 [3] 刘冬冬, 黄钰, 申海洋. 多媒体健康教育干预对乳腺癌改良根治术患者心理状态、生活质量及免疫功能的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2022, 20(20): 2130-2133, 2137.LIU D D, HUANG Y, SHEN H Y. Effects of multimedia health education intervention on mental state, quality of life and immune function of patients with breast cancer undergoing modified radical mastectomy[J]. Oncology Progress, 2022, 20(20): 2130-2133, 2137. [4] 刘媛怡, 董奇, 付建宇, 等. 多学科协作诊疗模式在急性消化道大出血治疗中应用的临床价值[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2023, 30(2): 196-198.LIU Y Y, DONG Q, FU J Y, et al. The clinical value of multidisciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment model in the treatment of acute gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Emergency, 2023, 30(2): 196-198. [5] 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(10): 954-1040.Breast cancer Professional Committee of China Anti Cancer Association. Guidelines and specifications for diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer of china anti cancer association (2021)[J]. Chinese Journal of Cancer, 2021, 31(10): 954-1040. [6] 孙晔, 刘思遥, 陈世裕, 等. 住院医师规范化培训学员考前焦虑抑郁情况调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(8): 1424-1427, 1432. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003651SUN Y, LIU S Y, CHEN S Y, et al. Investigation and analysis of pre exam anxiety and depression among standardized training students for resident physicians and influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(8): 1424-1427, 1432. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003651 [7] 卢舟燕, 顾燕儿, 应光璐, 等. "鱼骨图"指导下健康教育在乳腺疾病患者乳房保健中的应用效果[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(22): 4466-4470.LU Z Y, GU Y E, YING G L, et al. The application effect of health education guided by the "fishbone diagram" in breast health care for patients with breast diseases[J]. China Maternal and Child Health Care, 2023, 38(22): 4466-4470. [8] BURSTEIN H J, CURIGLIANO G, THVRLIMANN B, et al. Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the st. gallen international consensus guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021[J]. Ann Oncol, 2021, 32(10): 1216-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023 [9] MOHITE P P, KANASE S B. Effectiveness of scapular strengthening exercises on shoulder dysfunction for pain and functional disability after modified radical mastectomy: a controlled clinical trial[J]. APJCP, 2023, 24(6): 2099-2104. [10] 王瑞, 熊小云, 刘路雨, 等. 多模式健康教育对乳腺癌患者术后患肢功能、负性情绪和生活质量的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2023, 21(1): 41-44, 48.WANG R, XIONG X Y, LIU L Y, et al. The impact of multimodal health education on the function of affected limbs, negative emotions and quality of life of breast cancer patients after surgery[J]. Oncology Progress, 2023, 21(1): 41-44, 48. [11] 王佳妮, 欧开萍, 刘嘉琦, 等. 乳腺癌多学科综合诊疗模式的能力建设及发展趋势[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2023, 32(5): 656-664.WANG J N, OU K P, LIU J Q, et al. Capacity building and development trend of multidisciplinary comprehensive diagnosis and treatment model for breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Surgery, 2023, 32(5): 656-664. [12] 李金红, 尹利, 安凤荣. 多学科合作下同伴支持对2型糖尿病抑郁患者抑郁状态的改善作用研究[J]. 中国医刊, 2021, 56(9): 1035-1038.LI J H, YIN L, AN F R. Research on the improvement effect of peer support on depressive status of type 2 diabetes patients with depression under multidisciplinary cooperation[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2021, 56(9): 1035-1038. [13] 张润, 刘静, 骆昌全, 等. 基于立体MDT模式引导下2型糖尿病患者临床护理路径的构建与应用[J]. 西部医学, 2021, 33(2): 301-307.ZHANG R, LIU J, LUO C Q, et al. Construction and application of clinical nursing path for patients with type 2 diabetes under the guidance of three-dimensional MDT model[J]. Western Medicine, 2021, 33(2): 301-307. [14] LAMB B W, MIAH S, SKOLARUS T A, et al. Development and validation of a short version of the metric for the observation of decision-making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: MODe-Lite[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(12): 7577-7588. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09989-7 [15] 李帆, 黄莹, 袁伟, 等. 延续护理信息平台对乳腺癌化疗患者自我管理能力和生存质量的影响研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2022, 39(4): 22-25, 84.LI F, HUANG Y, YUAN W, et al. Study on the influence of continuous nursing information platform on self-management ability and quality of life of chemotherapy patients with breast cancer[J]. Journal of PLA Nursing, 2022, 39(4): 22-25, 84. [16] PRGOMET D, BI$\bar{\mathtt{S}}$OF V, PRSTAČIḈ R, et al. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the treatment of head and neck cancer: a single-institution experience[J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2022, 61(4): 77-87. [17] 凌国珍, 李妹英, 韦汝琼, 等. 基于行为改变模式理论的健康教育联合临床药师参与下的多学科协作团队模式对服用阿片类药物的癌痛患者的管理效果[J]. 广西医学, 2022, 44(23): 2744-2748.LING G Z, LI M Y, WEI R Q, et al. The management effect of a multidisciplinary collaborative team model of health education combined with clinical pharmacists based on behavior change pattern theory on cancer pain patients taking opioid drugs[J]. Guangxi Medical Journal, 2022, 44(23): 2744-2748. [18] 王浩宇, 石文达, 赵晓彬, 等. 乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移的危险因素及行X线摄影与CT检查的诊断效能分析[J]. 河北医学, 2024, 30(3): 506-511.WANG H Y, SHI W D, ZHAO X B, et al. Analysis of risk factors for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients and the diagnostic efficacy of X-ray photography and CT examination[J]. Hebei Medicine, 2024, 30(3): 506-511. [19] 段训凰, 李道生, 曾祥胜, 等. 基于精准医学与MDT模式在进展期或复发结直肠癌中的临床应用价值[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2021, 36(5): 844-846.DUAN X H, LI D S, ZENG X S, et al. The clinical application value of precision medicine and MDT model in advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer[J]. Journal of Practical Cancer, 2021, 36(5): 844-846. [20] 史明英, 黎恩知, 黄雅舒, 等. 个案管理的延伸护理模式对成年癫痫患者院外遵医行为、自护能力及癫痫院外发作时意外损伤的影响[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2022, 37(10): 1365-1368.SHI M Y, LI E Z, HUANG Y S, et al. The extended nursing model of case management and its impact on adult epilepsy patients ' compliance with medical treatment outside the hospital, self-care ability, and accidental injury during epileptic seizures[J]. Journal of North Sichuan Medical College, 2022, 37(10): 1365-1368. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 8
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
下载: