Clinical observation on the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine compression pack therapy for postoperative neck pain in thyroid cancer patients
-
摘要:
目的 评估中药封包疗法治疗甲状腺癌患者术后颈部疼痛的临床疗效,分析其对术后恢复的改善作用,并观察治疗的安全性。 方法 采用随机数字表法将2025年1—3月于安徽中医药大学第一附属医院甲状腺乳腺外科接受甲状腺癌根治术且术后出现颈部疼痛的76例患者分为治疗组与对照组,每组38例。对照组予以常规护理,治疗组在对照组基础上加用中药封包疗法。本研究采用数字评分量表(NRS)、简明疼痛评估量表(BPI)评价2组患者手术后1 h、手术后3 d疼痛情况。采用术后恢复质量量表-15(QoR-15)评价患者手术前1 d、手术后3 d手术恢复情况,并比较2组患者手术后不良反应发生情况。 结果 组内比较:治疗组手术后3 d的NRS、BPI评分较手术后1 d显著降低(P<0.05)。组间比较:治疗组手术后3 d NRS评分为[0(0, 0)]分,显著低于对照组[1(1, 1)分,Z=-6.595,P<0.001];治疗组手术后3 d BPI疼痛强度得分为(6.71±2.54)分,显著低于对照组[(8.89±3.56)分,F=8.862,P=0.004];治疗组手术后3 d BPI疼痛影响得分为(15.00±5.80)分,显著低于对照组[(19.68±4.27)分, F=15.027,P<0.001];治疗组手术后3 d QoR-15评分为(130.42±9.36)分,显著高于对照组[(121.76±8.38)分, F=17.805,P<0.001]。2组患者在治疗期间均未出现不良反应。 结论 相较于对照组,中药封包疗法可以更好地改善甲状腺癌患者术后颈部疼痛,加速患者术后恢复,且安全性良好。 Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pack therapy in managing postoperative neck pain in thyroid cancer patients. In addition, the study will analyze its role in enhancing postoperative recovery and assess treatment safety. Methods A total of 76 patients who underwent radical surgery for thyroid cancer at the Thyroid and Breast Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine between January and March 2025, and developed postoperative neck pain were randomized into treatment and control groups (38 cases each) using a random number table. The control group received routine care, while the treatment group received additional TCM pack therapy. The severity of pain was measured using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the brief pain inventory (BPI) at one hour and three days after surgery. Postoperative recovery was evaluated using the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale on the day before surgery and 3 days post-surgery. Adverse reactions were also recorded. Results A comparison was made between the groups. In the treatment group, NRS and BPI scores at 3 days postoperatively were significantly decreased in comparison with those at 1 day postoperatively (P < 0.05).Inter-group comparison: Three days after the operation, the treatment group exhibited a significantly lower NRS score [0 (0, 0)] than the control group [1 (1, 1), Z=-6.595, P < 0.001]. Furthermore, the treatment group demonstrated a lower BPI pain intensity score (6.71±2.54 vs. 8.89±3.56, F=8.862, P=0.004), indicating a lower level of interference with pain. Similarly, the mean score for the QoR-15 scale was higher (130.42±9.36 vs. 121.76±8.38, F=17.805, P < 0.001). No adverse reactions were observed in either group during treatment. Conclusion In comparison with the control group, TCM pack therapy significantly alleviated postoperative neck pain, accelerated recovery, and demonstrated favorable safety in thyroid cancer patients. -
表 1 2组甲状腺癌根治术患者一般资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of general characteristics between two groups of patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer
组别 例数 性别(例) 年龄(x ± s,岁) 女性 男性 治疗组 38 28 10 43.74±11.22 对照组 38 30 8 44.61±11.88 统计量 0.291a 0.328b P值 0.589 0.736 注:a为χ2值,b为t值。 表 2 组甲状腺癌根治术患者术后NRS评分比较[M(P25, P75),分]
Table 2. Comparison of NRS scores before and after treatment between two groups of patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer [M(P25, P75), points]
组别 例数 手术后1 h 手术后3 d 治疗组 38 3(3,3) 0(0,0)a 对照组 38 3(3,3) 1(1,1)a Z值 -1.000 -6.595 P值 0.317 <0.001 注:与同组手术后1 h比较,aP<0.05。 表 3 2组甲状腺癌根治术患者术后BPI量表比较(x ± s,分)
Table 3. Comparison of BPI scores before and after treatment between two groups of patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer (x ± s, points)
组别 例数 BPI疼痛强度 BPI疼痛影响情况 手术后1 h 手术后3 d 手术后1 h 手术后3 d 治疗组 38 8.53±3.42 6.71±2.54b 21.37±5.51 15.00±5.80b 对照组 38 9.50±2.76 8.89±3.56 20.34±5.10 19.68±4.27 统计量 1.361a 8.862c 0.846a 15.027c P值 0.178 0.004 0.400 <0.001 注:a为t值,c为F值。与同组手术后1 h比较,bP<0.05。 表 4 2组甲状腺癌根治术患者术后QoR-15问卷评分比较(x ± s,分)
Table 4. Comparison of QoR-15 scores before and after treatment between two groups of patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer (x ± s, points)
组别 例数 手术前1 d 手术后3 d 治疗组 38 139.00±6.91 130.42±9.36b 对照组 38 138.87±8.16 121.76±8.38b 统计量 0.075a 17.805c P值 0.940 <0.001 注:a为t值,c为F值。与同组手术前1 d比较,bP<0.05。 -
[1] BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, SUNG H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263. [2] 葛王舒琦, 王中王, 胡泽瑞, 等. 2022年全球及中国甲状腺癌发病率和死亡率分析[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2025, 38(2): 107-115.GEWANG S Q, WANG Z W, HU Z R, et al. Incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer globally and in China in 2022[J]. Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment, 2025, 38(2): 107-115. [3] 何林烨, 王艺超, 李志辉. 2022年中国甲状腺癌流行情况分析: 基于《中国肿瘤登记年报》2005—2018年数据[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2024, 31(7): 790-795.HE L Y, WANG Y C, LI Z H. Analysis of prevalence of thyroid cancer in 2022 in China: based on the data of China Cancer Registry Annual Report(2005-2018)[J]. Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery, 2024, 31(7): 790-795. [4] 王福可, 孙瑞梅. 甲状腺手术后疼痛的研究进展[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2024, 24(11): 759-765.WANG F K, SUN R M. Research progress of pain after thyroid surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2024, 24(11): 759-765. [5] 陆天雅, 陈娇龙, 刘建军, 等. 基于预康复的全程管理在免充气经口腔镜甲状腺癌患者中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(6): 1064-1068. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003050LU T Y, CHEN Q L, LIU J J, et al. Whole-process management based on pre-habilitation concept in patients of the gasless transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(6): 1064-1068. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003050 [6] 郝敏丽, 乔翠峰, 罗雪娇, 等. 渐进性肌肉放松训练结合肩颈部运动训练对甲状腺癌术后患者的康复效果研究[J]. 河北医药, 2024, 46(14): 2160-2163.HAO M L, QIAO C F, LUO X J, et al. Effect of progressive muscle relaxation combined with shoulder and neck exercises on postoperative rehabilitation in patients with thyroid cancer[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2024, 46(14): 2160-2163. [7] 彭鹏, 郑莹, 王杰军, 等. 癌痛患者的生活质量及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2009, 18(4): 273-277.PENG P, ZHENG Y, WANG J J, et al. Quality of life and its influential factors in patients with cancer pain[J]. China Cancer, 2009, 18(4): 273-277. [8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 癌症疼痛诊疗规范(2018年版)[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2018, 23(10): 937-944.National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. Standard diagnosis and treatment of cancer pain(version 2018)[J]. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23(10): 937-944. [9] 中国抗癌协会肿瘤整体评估专业委员会. 阿片类药物不良反应综合防治专家共识(2024年版)[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2024, 51(15): 757-763.Committee of Cancer Overall Evaluation, China Anti-Cancer Association. Expert consensus on integrated prevention and treatment of opioid-related adverse drug reactions(2024 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024, 51(15): 757-763. [10] 韦忠娜, 邹弢, 邱智, 等. 非甾体抗炎药不良反应报告43例分析[J]. 临床合理用药, 2023, 16(24): 158-160.WEI Z N, ZOU T, QIU Z, et al. Analysis of 43 cases of adverse reaction reports of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use, 2023, 16(24): 158-160. [11] 赵志常, 曹冬英, 李景梅, 等. 中药外治法及其应用概况[J]. 海峡药学, 2024, 36(12): 31-33.ZHAO Z C, CAO D Y, LI J M, et al. Traditional Chinese Medicine external treatment and its application overview[J]. Strait Pharmaceutical Journal, 2024, 36(12): 31-33. [12] 李要远, 郑红刚, 鲍艳举, 等. 以瘀为核心辨治癌痛[J]. 中医学报, 2021, 36(11): 2281-2284.LI Y Y, ZHENG H G, BAO Y J, et al. Syndrome differentiation and treatment of cancer pain with blood stasis as the core[J]. Acta Chinese Medicine, 2021, 36(11): 2281-2284. [13] 夏宁俊, 王国方, 章永红, 等. 活血化瘀法在恶性肿瘤治疗中的应用探讨[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2022, 28(12): 1957-1960.XIA N J, WANG G F, ZHANG Y H, et al. Application of blood activating and stasis removing method in treatment of malignant tumor[J]. Journal Of Basic Chinese Medicine, 2022, 28(12): 1957-1960. [14] GOUDMAN L, PILITSIS J G, BILLET B, et al. The level of agreement between the numerical rating scale and visual analogue scale for assessing pain intensity in adults with chronic pain[J]. Anaesthesia, 2024, 79(2): 128-138. doi: 10.1111/anae.16151 [15] 王顺星, 徐超, 尚磊, 等. 简明疼痛量表在疼痛评估中的应用[J]. 河北医药, 2024, 46(21): 3322-3328.WANG S X, XU C, SHANG L, et al. Application of the brief pain inventory in pain assessment[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2024, 46(21): 3322-3328. [16] CHAWAKA H J, TESHOME Z B. The underreported postoperative suffering after thyroid surgery: dysphagia, dysphonia, and neck pain: a cross-sectional study[J]. Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2023: 1312980. DOI: 10.1155/2023/1312980. [17] 郭晓琴, 任晓琴. 中药封包用于癌性疼痛的疗效观察[J]. 中西医结合研究, 2016, 8(1): 33-34.GUO X Q, REN X Q. Observation on the curative effect of traditional Chinese medicine encapsulation on cancer pain[J]. Research of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 2016, 8(1): 33-34. [18] 赵奕栋, 孙文豪, 陈天源, 等. 紫苏叶有效成分药理作用研究进展[J]. 江苏中医药, 2022, 54(8): 79-82.ZHAO Y D, SUN W H, CHEN T Y, et al. Review of pharmacological actions of effective components from perilla leaves[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2022, 54(8): 79-82. [19] 王琪, 李美景, 郭小萌, 等. 吴茱萸汤2种相态成分及抗炎镇痛作用差异的分析[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2024, 49(21): 5865-5876.WANG Q, LI M J, GUO X M, et al. Differences in components and anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of two phase states of Wuzhuyu Decoction[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2024, 49(21): 5865-5876. [20] 吴文雅, 何彩云. 甲状腺癌术后患者症状困扰与生活质量的相关性研究[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2024, 21(1): 154-158.WU W Y, HE C Y. Correlational study on post-thyroidectomy symptom distress and quality of life among thyroid cancer patients[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Sciences), 2024, 21(1): 154-158. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 9
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
下载: