留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

淀粉样变性患者临床特征及其预后影响因素分析

张尚艺 张启科 魏小芳 冯友繁 伏媛 陈巧琳 张媛媛 张少华 柳洁 李晨阳

张尚艺, 张启科, 魏小芳, 冯友繁, 伏媛, 陈巧琳, 张媛媛, 张少华, 柳洁, 李晨阳. 淀粉样变性患者临床特征及其预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(7): 1103-1106. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004074
引用本文: 张尚艺, 张启科, 魏小芳, 冯友繁, 伏媛, 陈巧琳, 张媛媛, 张少华, 柳洁, 李晨阳. 淀粉样变性患者临床特征及其预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(7): 1103-1106. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004074
ZHANG Shangyi, ZHANG Qike, WEI Xiaofang, FENG Youfan, FU Yuan, CHEN Qiaolin, ZHANG Yuanyuan, ZHANG Shaohua, LIU Jie, LI Chenyang. Analysis of clinical features and prognostic factors of amyloidosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(7): 1103-1106. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004074
Citation: ZHANG Shangyi, ZHANG Qike, WEI Xiaofang, FENG Youfan, FU Yuan, CHEN Qiaolin, ZHANG Yuanyuan, ZHANG Shaohua, LIU Jie, LI Chenyang. Analysis of clinical features and prognostic factors of amyloidosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(7): 1103-1106. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004074

淀粉样变性患者临床特征及其预后影响因素分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004074
基金项目: 

甘肃省科技计划项目 22JR5RA660

甘肃省科技计划项目 25JRRA295

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    张启科,E-mail: zqk05@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R597.2

Analysis of clinical features and prognostic factors of amyloidosis

  • 摘要:   目的   淀粉样变性患者的临床表现常缺乏特异性,并且伴有多脏器功能损害,导致预后较差。本研究旨在分析淀粉样变性患者的实验室及影像学特征,并探讨该类患者预后的影响因素。   方法   收集甘肃省人民医院2017年7月—2023年8月收治的41例淀粉样变性患者临床资料,并对其临床特点及预后进行回顾性分析和总结。   结果   41例患者的中位发病年龄为64(41~75)岁;男性27例(65.85%),女性14例(34.15%)。28例(68.29%)患者接受化疗,6例(14.63%)患者接受自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT),13例(31.71%)患者未治疗;对接受治疗的28例患者进行疗效评估,其中5例(17.86%)患者达到完全缓解(CR),7例(25.00%)患者达到部分缓解(PR),1例(3.57%)患者病情稳定(SD),1例(3.57%)患者病情进展(PD),7例(25.00%)患者失访,7例(25.00%)患者死亡。单因素分析显示,是否有心脏受累、是否有肾脏受累以及是否移植是影响患者总生存期的因素(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,有心脏、肾脏受累是影响患者总生存期的独立危险因素。41例患者中位随访时间为8(1~68)个月,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为6(1~68)个月。   结论   淀粉样变性以系统性轻链型淀粉样变性为主,治疗以联合化疗为主,是否有心脏受累、是否有肾脏受累与患者预后相关。对于符合移植条件的患者仍然首推ASCT。

     

  • 表  1  41例淀粉样变性患者的实验室指标

    Table  1.   Laboratory indicators of amyloidosis patients

    指标 数据
    白细胞[M(P25, P75),×109/L] 6.25(5.00, 10.48)
    中性粒细胞[M(P25, P75),×109/L] 4.21(3.17, 6.87)
    淋巴细胞[M(P25, P75),×109/L] 1.33(0.95, 2.09)
    单核细胞[M(P25, P75),×109/L] 0.45(0.32, 0.72)
    血红蛋白(x±s,g/L) 130.00±31.70
    血小板(x±s,×109/L) 211.00±82.37
    白蛋白(x±s,g/L) 27.00±8.88
    球蛋白[M(P25, P75),g/L] 23.20(19.54, 28.36)
    Scr升高[例(%)] 12(29.27)
    NT-proBNP升高[例(%)] 34(82.93)
    ALP升高[例(%)] 9(21.95)
    血游离κ链升高[例(%)] 13(31.71)
    血游离λ链升高[例(%)] 22(53.66)
    尿KAPPA链升高[例(%)] 26(63.41)
    尿LAMDA链升高[例(%)] 26(63.41)
    M蛋白阳性[例(%)] 30(73.17)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  淀粉样变性患者总生存时间影响因素单因素和多因素分析

    Table  2.   Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors affecting overall survival in patients with amyloidosis

    变量 例数 单因素分析 多因素分析
    HR(95% CI) P HR(95% CI) P
    性别(男性/女性) 27/14 0.819(-8.930~6.025) 0.591
    年龄(≤60岁/>60岁) 18/23 1.536(7.197~11.424) 0.279
    是否有心脏受累(是/否) 25/16 0.591(2.942~5.618) 0.018 0.636(0.436~3.692) 0.042
    是否有肾脏受累(是/否) 32/9 0.628(1.176~3.762) 0.005 0.739(1.002~2.981) 0.021
    血清免疫固定电泳阳性轻链类(λ/κ) 32/9 0.813(6.269~15.228) 0.454
    是否移植(是/否) 6/35 1.372(4.753~8.061) 0.037 1.539(3.649~9.027) 0.276
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 赵雪, 于澈, 王荣. 71例淀粉样变性肾病患者临床及病理特点研究[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2021, 21(6): 455-462.

    ZHAO X, YU C, WANG R. Clinicopathological features of 71 patients with amyloidosis nephropathy[J]. Journal Of Clinical Nephrology, 2021, 21(6): 455-462.
    [2] BAKER K R. Light chain amyloidosis: epidemiology, staging, and prognostication[J]. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J, 2022, 18(2): 27-35. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1070
    [3] 中国系统性轻链型淀粉样变性协作组, 国家肾脏疾病临床医学研究中心, 国家血液系统疾病临床医学研究中心. 系统性轻链型淀粉样变性诊断和治疗指南(2021年修订)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(22): 1646-1656.

    Chinese Cooperative Group of Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis, National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Hematological Diseases. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of systemic light chain amyloidosis (revised in 2021)[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2021, 101(22): 1646-1656.
    [4] 洪伊, 张媛媛, 李真, 等. 系统性轻链型淀粉样变性发病机制及诊治进展[J]. 肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志, 2023, 32(2): 156-162.

    HONG Y, ZHANG Y Y, LI Z, et al. Advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of systemic light chain amyloidosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, Dialysis & Transplantation, 2023, 32(2): 156-162.
    [5] GERTZ M A, DISPENZIERI A. Systemic amyloidosis recognition, prognosis, and therapy: a systematic review[J]. JAMA, 2020, 324(1): 79-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5493
    [6] 吴胜兰, 别彩群. 以巨肝为主要表现的原发性淀粉样变性1例[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(9): 1612-1614. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001010

    WU S L, BIE C Q. Primary amyloidosis with giant liver as the main manifestation: 1 case[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(9): 1612-1614. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001010
    [7] HESTER L L, GIFKINS D M, KEVIN M B, et al. Diagnostic delay and characterization of the clinical prodrome in AL amyloidosis among 1523 US adults diagnosed between 2001 and 2019[J]. Eur J Haematol, 2021, 107(4): 428-435. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13679
    [8] SHARMA S, LABIB S B, SHAH S P. Electrocardiogram criteria to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis in men with a bundle branch block[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2021, 146: 89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.01.026
    [9] LIANG S C, LIU Z Y, LI Q, et al. Advance of echocardiography in cardiac amyloidosis[J]. Heart Fail Rev, 2023, 28(6): 1345-1356. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10332-3
    [10] VIDAL-PEREZ R, VÁZQUEZ-GARCÍA R, BARGE-CABALLERO G, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac imaging in amyloidosis[J]. World J Cardiol, 2020, 12(12): 599-614. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i12.599
    [11] 陈玉莹, 薛洁, 王倩, 等. 超声诊断心肌淀粉样变性1例[J]. 心脏杂志, 2022, 34(3): 373-374.

    CHEN Y Y, XUE J, WANG Q, et al. A case of ultrasound diagnosis of myocardial amyloidosis[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2022, 34(3): 373-374.
    [12] VAXMAN I, GERTZ M. When to suspect a diagnosis of amyloidosis[J]. Acta Haematol, 2020, 143(4): 304-311. doi: 10.1159/000506617
    [13] RY$\overline{\mathrm{S}}$AVÁ R. AL amyloidosis: advances in diagnostics and treatment[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2019, 34(9): 1460-1466. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy291
    [14] PINTON S, VACCHI E, CHIARO G, et al. Amyloid detection and typing yield of skin biopsy in systemic amyloidosis and polyneuropathy[J]. Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 2023, 10(12): 2347-2359. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51924
    [15] XIE W W, WANG Q, ZHOU F D, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of a Chinese cohort with systemic light chain amyloidosis: a single-center study[J]. Int J Hematol, 2023, 118(2): 231-241. doi: 10.1007/s12185-023-03617-8
    [16] BLAIR H A. Daratumumab: a review in newly diagnosed systemic light chain amyloidosis[J]. Drugs, 2022, 82(6): 683-690. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01705-3
    [17] RAVICHANDRAN S, LACHMANN H J, WECHALEKAR A D. Epidemiologic and survival trends in amyloidosis, 1987-2019[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(16): 1567-1568. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1917321
    [18] PALLADINI G, KASTRITIS E, MAURER M S, et al. Daratumumab plus CyBorD for patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: safety run-in results of ANDROMEDA[J]. Blood, 2020, 136(1): 71-80. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019004460
    [19] 蔡真, 何冬花. 如何诊断和治疗系统性轻链型肾淀粉样变性[J]. 肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志, 2021, 30(6): 549-550.

    CAI Z, HE D H. How to diagnose and treat patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, Dialysis & Transplantation, 2021, 30(6): 549-550.
  • 加载中
表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-09-24
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-10-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回