留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

NOC2L联合SLFN11检测在肝癌病情及预后评估中的临床价值

何建新 张洪彬 楼韵燕

何建新, 张洪彬, 楼韵燕. NOC2L联合SLFN11检测在肝癌病情及预后评估中的临床价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(5): 823-826. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004010
引用本文: 何建新, 张洪彬, 楼韵燕. NOC2L联合SLFN11检测在肝癌病情及预后评估中的临床价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(5): 823-826. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004010
HE Jianxin, ZHANG Hongbin, LOU Yunyan. Clinical value of NOC2L combined with SLFN11 detection in the evaluation of liver cancer condition and prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(5): 823-826. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004010
Citation: HE Jianxin, ZHANG Hongbin, LOU Yunyan. Clinical value of NOC2L combined with SLFN11 detection in the evaluation of liver cancer condition and prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(5): 823-826. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004010

NOC2L联合SLFN11检测在肝癌病情及预后评估中的临床价值

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004010
基金项目: 

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2024KY507

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    楼韵燕,E-mail:zoe201305@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R735.7

Clinical value of NOC2L combined with SLFN11 detection in the evaluation of liver cancer condition and prognosis

  • 摘要:   目的  NOC2L和SLFN11与恶性肿瘤发病机制密切相关,本研究旨在分析NOC2L联合SLFN11检测在肝癌中的临床价值。  方法  检测2020年1月—2021年12月义乌市中心医院诊治的95例肝癌患者(HCC组)及51例肝脏良性疾病患者(对照组)NOC2L、SLFN11表达水平,并分析与预后、生存期的关系。  结果  HCC组肿瘤组织NOC2L高于癌旁组织和对照组(1.26±0.25 vs.0.72±0.11、0.69±0.13,F=264.577,P < 0.001),SLFN11低于癌旁组织和对照组(0.78±0.12 vs.0.96±0.17、0.98±0.15,F=46.396,P < 0.001)。HCC组NOC2L表达与病理分级、原发肿瘤T分期、转移淋巴结数、远处转移及TNM分期均呈正相关关系(均rs>0,P < 0.05),SLFN11表达与上述项目均呈负相关关系(均rs < 0,P < 0.05)。SLFN11联合NOC2L检测预测肝癌预后不良的效能高于NOC2L、SLFN11单独预测(P < 0.05)。NOC2L≥1.26、SLFN11≤0.78为肝癌预后不良的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。NOC2L≥1.26、SLFN11≤0.78患者中位生存期低于NOC2L<1.26或SLFN11>0.78的患者(log-rank χ2=14.618,P < 0.001)。  结论  肝癌NOC2L和SLFN11表达可为肝癌病情及预后评估提供客观证据,两者联合可显著提高预测病情及预后的价值。

     

  • 图  1  不同NOC2L、SLFN11表达情况肝癌患者Kaplan-Meier生存分析

    Figure  1.  Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of HCC patients with different NOC2L and SLFN11 expression levels

    表  1  HCC组与对照组基线资料比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of baseline clinical data of subjects in the HCC group and the control group

    组别 例数 性别(男性/女性,例) 年龄(x±s,岁) 卡氏评分(x±s,分) BMI (x±s) 肝炎病史(有/无,例) 家族史(有/无,例)
    HCC组 95 59/36 56.72±8.11 92.37±4.09 22.56±3.04 70/25 15/80
    对照组 51 33/18 56.28±8.46 92.31±4.25 22.31±3.15 35/16 9/42
    统计量 0.096a 0.308b 0.083b 0.468b 0.420a 0.083a
    P 0.756 0.759 0.934 0.641 0.517 0.773
    注:a为χ2值,bt值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同临床病理特征肝癌患者肿瘤组织NOC2L、SLFN11表达比较(x±s)

    Table  2.   Comparison of NOC2L and SLFN11 expressions in liver cancer tumor tissues with different clinicopathological characteristics(x±s)

    项目 例数 NOC2L t P SLFN11 t P
    性别 0.587 0.559 0.774 0.441
      男性 59 1.24±0.23 0.77±0.11
      女性 36 1.27±0.26 0.79±0.14
    年龄 0.585 0.561 1.091 0.278
      ≥60岁 43 1.25±0.22 0.76±0.11
       < 60岁 52 1.28±0.27 0.79±0.15
    肿瘤位置 0.414 0.680 0.722 0.472
      右半肝 50 1.27±0.24 0.77±0.13
      左半肝 45 1.25±0.23 0.79±0.14
    病理类型 0.333 0.740 0.645 0.521
      肝细胞癌 86 1.28±0.26 0.76±0.13
      其他 9 1.25±0.22 0.79±0.16
    病理分级 2.159 0.334 4.168 < 0.001
      1~2级 60 1.21±0.22 0.82±0.14
      3级 35 1.32±0.27 0.71±0.09
    原发肿瘤T分期 2.316 0.023 4.753 < 0.001
      T1~T2 51 1.19±0.18 0.84±0.15
      T3~T4 44 1.29±0.24 0.72±0.08
    转移淋巴结数 3.062 0.003 4.652 < 0.001
      N0 68 1.17±0.19 0.83±0.14
      N1 27 1.32±0.27 0.69±0.11
    远处转移 2.228 0.028 3.905 < 0.001
      无 81 1.19±0.18 0.84±0.15
      有 14 1.31±0.22 0.68±0.07
    TNM分期 4.054 < 0.001 5.730 < 0.001
      Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 74 1.17±0.14 0.85±0.14
      Ⅲ~Ⅳ期 21 1.35±0.28 0.66±0.11
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  肿瘤组织NOC2L、SLFN11表达与肝癌临床病理特征的相关性

    Table  3.   Correlation between NOC2L and SLFN11 expressions in tumor tissues and clinicopathological characteristics of liver cancer

    项目 NOC2L SLFN11
    rs P rs P
    病理分级 0.637 0.017 -0.704 0.036
    原发肿瘤T分期 0.665 0.024 -0.681 0.015
    转移淋巴结数 0.713 0.008 -0.639 0.021
    远处转移 0.691 0.026 -0.626 0.005
    TNM分期 0.634 0.031 -0.677 0.018
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  肝癌预后不良危险因素的多因素Cox回归分析

    Table  4.   Multivariate Cox regression analysis of risk factors for poor prognosis of liver cancer

    变量 B SE Waldχ2 P HR 95% CI
    NOC2L≥1.26 1.577 0.162 15.466 < 0.001 4.841 1.578~6.452
    SLFN11≤0.78 1.451 0.149 14.023 < 0.001 4.267 1.311~6.057
    注:赋值方法如下,预后良好=0,预后不良=1;NOC2L<1.26=0,≥1.26=1;SLFN11>0.78=0,≤0.78=1。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  NOC2L、SLFN11预测肝癌患者预后不良的灵敏度及特异度

    Table  5.   Sensitivity and specificity of NOC2L and SLFN11 in predicting poor prognosis of patients with liver cancer

    项目 灵敏度 特异度 P SE AUC 95% CI
    NOC2L 0.656 0.614 0.017 0.078 0.675 0.415~1133
    SLFN11 0.621 0.649 0.023 0.068 0.692 0.405~1.201
    NOC2L联合SLFN11 0.856 0.877 0.005 0.095 0.874ab 0.517~1.453
    注:与NOC2L比较,aP < 0.05;与SLFN11比较,bP < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 童里, 郑小飞, 顾旺, 等. 细胞自噬在肝细胞肝癌中的研究现状[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(4): 672-676. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002957

    TONG L, ZHENG X F, GU W, et al. Research status of autophagy in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(4): 672-676. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002957
    [2] ZHENG S, CHAN S W, LIU F, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: current drug therapeutic status, advances and challenges[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2024, 16(8): 1582. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081582.
    [3] 凡丹丹, 高芳芳, 邹婧, 等. 喉癌肿瘤组织NOC2L、p53表达及其临床价值研究[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2024, 23(10): 1177-1181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2024.10.005

    FAN D D, GAO F F, ZOU J, et al. Expression of NOC2L and p53 in laryngeal carcinoma tumor tissue and its clinical value[J]. Chinese Journal of Difficult and Complicated Cases, 2024, 23(10): 1177-1181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2024.10.005
    [4] KACZOROWSKI M, YLAYA K, CHŁOPEK M, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) expression in cancer in the search of biomarker-informed treatment targets: a study of 127 entities represented by 6658 tumors[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2024(8): 35-52.
    [5] MU A, OKAMOTO Y, KATSUKI Y, et al. The role of SLFN11 in DNA replication stress response and its implications for the Fanconi anemia pathway[J]. DNA Repair (Amst), 2024, 141(4): 103733. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103733.
    [6] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(2): 277-292.

    National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China Medical Administration. Diagnosis and treatment criteria for primary liver cancer (2019 edition)[J]. Journal of Hepatobiliary Diseases, 2020, 36(2): 277-292.
    [7] 马倩, 李亚, 马艺钊, 等. 中药调控p53信号通路干预肺癌的作用机制研究进展[J]. 中国药房, 2024, 35(11): 1403-1407.

    MA Q, LI Y, MA Y Z, et al. Mechanism research progress of traditional Chinese medicine intervening in lung cancer by regulating p53 signaling pathway[J]. China Pharmacy, 2024, 35(11): 1403-1407.
    [8] 李健, 金俊豪, 金艳花. JIB-04通过抑制组蛋白赖氨酸去甲基化酶4表达来调控MDM2/P53/SLC7A11/GPX4轴诱导肝癌细胞发生铁死亡[J]. 中国生物化学与分子生物学报, 2024, 40(8): 1144-1152.

    LI J, JIN J H, JIN Y H. JIB-04 Regulates the MDM2/P53/SLC7A11/GPX4 Signaling Axis to Induce Ferroptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by Inhibiting KDM4C Expression[J]. Chinese Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2024, 40(8): 1144-1152.
    [9] LI Y, WANG L, LIU X, et al. NIR promotes progression of colorectal cancer through regulating RB[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res, 2021, 1868(1): 118856. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118856.
    [10] XU L, TAN A C, WINSLOW R L, et al. Merging microarray data from separate breast cancer studies provides a robust prognostic test[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9(7): 125.
    [11] KÖNIG P, EICHHORN J M, SUPARMAN E, et al. SLFN11 and ATR as targets for overcoming cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 2024, 1870(8): 167448. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167448.
    [12] SIMIC' I, GUZONJIC' A, KOTUR STEVULJEVIC' J, et al. Correlation of systemic inflammation parameters and serum SLFN11 in small cell lung cancer-a prospective pilot study[J]. Biomedicines, 2024, 12(5): 976.
    [13] WANG H X, ZHAO Z P, DU X Y, et al. SLFN11 promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway[J]. Med Oncol, 2024, 41(2): 54.
    [14] ZHOU C, LIU C, LIU W, et al. SLFN11 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis and metastasis by targeting RPS4X via mTOR pathway[J]. Theranostics, 2020, 10(10): 4627-4643.
    [15] ZHOU C, WENG J, LIU C, et al. Disruption of SLFN11 deficiency-induced CCL2 signaling and macrophage M2 polarization potentiates anti-PD-1 therapy efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2023, 164(7): 1261-1278.
    [16] GOYAL H, PARWANI S, KAUR J. Deciphering the nexus between long non-coding RNAs and endoplasmic reticulum stress in hepatocellular carcinoma: biomarker discovery and therapeutic horizons[J]. Cell Death Discov, 2024, 10(1): 451.
    [17] 张雅琼, 黄澜, 潘聪莹. 多种血液学标志物预测肝癌切除术后感染的临床价值[J]. 中国临床研究, 2024, 37(10): 1542-1546.

    ZHANG Y Q, HUANG L, PAN C Y. Clinical value of multiple hematological markers to predict infection after hepatic carcinectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Research, 2024, 37(10): 1542-1546.
    [18] 钟敏, 杨小莉. 肝硬化-肝癌恶性转化的相关机制及诊断生物标志物研究进展[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2024, 35(5): 121-124.

    ZHONG M, YANG X L. Research progress on the related mechanism of malignant transformation of liver cirrhosis-hepatocellular carcinoma and diagnostic biomarkers[J]. Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 2024, 35(5): 121-124.
    [19] 陈文亮, 徐细明. 肝癌早期诊断标志物的研究新进展[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(1): 40-44.

    CHEN W L, XU X M. New progress in the study of markers for the early diagnosis of liver cancer[J]. China Medical Herald, 2023, 20(1): 40-44.
    [20] 周杰, 李敬东, 张立鑫, 等. Polo样激酶1在肝细胞肝癌中的作用及临床意义[J]. 安徽医学, 2023, 44(10): 1173-1179.

    ZHOU J, LI J D, ZHANG L X, et al. Polo-like kinase 1 Expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and its effect on cell proliferation[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2023, 44(10): 1173-1179.
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-10-09
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-08-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回