基于多学科协作的创伤性老年髋部骨折诊疗与护理模式的实施和效果评价

熊飞; 邵小平; 芮碧宇

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003312

基于多学科协作的创伤性老年髋部骨折诊疗与护理模式的实施和效果评价

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003312

上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院急诊医学科，上海 200233

基金项目:

上海市卫生健康委员会科研项目 202240142

详细信息

通讯作者:
邵小平，E-mail：shaoxiaoping1972@126.com

中图分类号: R473.6 R683.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 50
- HTML全文浏览量: 38
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-06-25
- 网络出版日期: 2024-01-29

Implementation and evaluation of a multidisciplinary team-based model for managing and caring for elderly patients with traumatic hip fractures

Department of Emergency Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200233, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨基于多学科协作的创伤性老年髋部骨折诊疗与护理模式的应用效果，分析其对患者住院期间手术相关指标、术后并发症发生率及护理满意度的影响。方法回顾性分析2022年9月—2023年4月在上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院接受髋关节手术的228例患者。根据救治和护理流程分为观察组(105例)和对照组(123例)。对照组采用常规流程，观察组在急诊科设置创伤性老年髋部骨折一站式病房，通过开通绿色通道和多学科综合会诊，优化诊疗和护理流程。比较2组患者手术相关指标、术后并发症发生率及患者满意度。结果与对照组比较，观察组术前等待时间[(1.62±0.35) vs.(2.70±0.52)d]、术后下床时间[(1.68±0.36) vs.(2.37±0.52)d]、住院时间[(5.62±1.76) vs.(8.27±2.52)d]明显缩短，术后入住ICU比例(2.86% vs. 9.76%)及30 d再入院率(2.86% vs.9.76%)明显降低(均P < 0.05)。与对照组比较，观察组术后肺部感染(2.86% vs. 9.76%)、切口感染(4.76% vs.13.01%)、下肢深静脉血栓发生率(8.57% vs.17.89%)均显著降低(均P < 0.05)。观察组总护理满意度为99.05%，明显高于对照组的91.87%(P < 0.05)。结论基于多学科协作的创伤性老年髋骨折诊疗与护理模式可使患者尽早实施手术治疗，缩短住院时间，减少围手术期并发症，改善患者护理满意度。
- 创伤性髋部骨折 /
- 老年 /
- 多学科协作 /
- 护理流程 /
- 绿色通道 /
- 效果评价
Abstract: Objective To investigate the impact of a multi-disciplinary team-based model on managing and caring for elderly patients with traumatic hip fractures, and analyze of surgical-related indicators, postoperative complications rate, and nursing satisfaction during the patient's hospitalization. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 228 patients who underwent hip joint surgery at the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from September 2022 to April 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: an observation group (105 cases) and a control group (123 cases), based on their treatment and care processes. The control group followed the routine procedure, while the observation group received acre in a dedicated one-stop ward designed specifically for elderly patients with traumatic hip fractures in the emergency department. The treatment and nursing process in the observation group were optimized through the implementation of a streamlined pathway and multidisciplinary comprehensive consultation. The study compared operation-related indicators, postoperative complication rates, and nursing satisfaction between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group demonstrated significant improvements in various aspects. The preoperative waiting time [(1.62±0.35) d vs. (2.70±0.52) d], postoperative mobilization time [(1.68±0.36) d vs. (2.37±0.52) d], and length of hospital stay [(5.62±1.76) d vs. (8.27±2.52) d] were significantly shortened in the observation group (all P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group exhibited a significant decrease in the proportion of postoperative ICU admission (2.86% vs.9.76%) and 30-day readmission rate (2.86% vs.9.76%), all P < 0.05. Moreover, compared with the control group, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection (2.86% vs.9.76%), incision infection (4.76% vs.13.01%), and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (8.57% vs.17.89%) in the observation group were significantly reduced (all P < 0.05). The overall nursing satisfaction rate in the observation group was 99.05%, which was significantly higher than in the control group (91.87%, P < 0.05). Conclusion The implementation of a multidisciplinary team-based model for managing and caring for elderly patients with traumatic hip fractures has demonstrated several positive outcomes. This model facilitates early surgical treatment, leading to shorter hospital stays, decreased perioperative complications, and improved nursing satisfaction.
- Traumatic hip fracture /
- Elderly /
- Multidisciplinary team /
- Nursing process /
- Green channel /
- Effect evaluation

HTML全文

表 1 2组行髋关节手术的患者一般资料比较

Table 1. Comparison of general data among patients undergoing hip joint surgery in two groups

项目	观察组(n=105)	对照组(n=123)	统计量	P值
年龄(x±s，岁)	70.7±4.5	71.6±5.0	1.424^a	0.158
性别(例)			2.263^b	0.132
男性	60	58
女性	45	65
骨折类型(例)			0.519^b	0.771
股骨颈骨折	74	91
股骨转子间骨折	26	28
股骨转子下骨折	5	4
手术类型(例)			0.027^b	0.987
髋关节置换术	48	55
髓内钉内固定	29	35
人工股骨头置换术	28	33
合并症(例)
高血压	22	21	0.557^b	0.455
糖尿病	13	11	0.711^b	0.399
冠心病	7	9	0.037^b	0.848
脑梗死	5	5	0.066^b	0.798
注：^a为t值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组行髋关节手术患者住院期间手术相关指标比较

Table 2. Comparative assessment of surgical-related indicators during hospitalization for patientsundergoing hip joint surgery between two groups

组别	例数	术前等待时间(x±s，d)	术后入住ICU[例(%)]	术后下床时间(x±s，d)	住院时间(x±s，d)	30 d再入院[例(%)]
观察组	105	1.62±0.35	3(2.86)	1.68±0.36	5.62±1.76	3(2.86)
对照组	123	2.70±0.52	12(9.76)	2.37±0.52	8.27±2.52	12(9.76)
统计量		18.073^a	4.387^b	11.448^a	9.047^a	4.387^b
P值		< 0.001	0.036	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.036
注：^a为t值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组行髋关节手术患者术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]

Table 3. Comparison of postoperative complications in patients undergoing hip joint surgery between two groups [cases (%)]

组别	例数	肺部感染	切口感染	下肢深静脉血栓	术后谵妄
观察组	105	3(2.86)	5(4.76)	9(8.57)	3(2.86)
对照组	123	12(9.76)	16(13.01)	22(17.89)	6(4.88)
χ²值		4.387	4.606	4.184	0.194
P值		0.036	0.032	0.041	0.660

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组行髋关节手术患者护理满意度比较[例(%)]

Table 4. Comparison of nursing satisfaction in patients undergoing hip joint surgery between two groups (%)]

组别	例数	非常满意	满意	不满意	满意度
观察组	105	70(66.67)	34(32.38)	1(0.95)	104(99.05)
对照组	123	49(39.84)	64(52.03)	10(8.13)	113(91.87)
注：2组满意度比较，χ²=6.355，P=0.012。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	HOU X L, LIU J Y, FAN X H, et al. Secular trends of incidence and hospitalization cost of hip fracture in Tangshan, China[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2022, 33(1): 89-96. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06050-x
[2]	GONG X F, LI X P, ZHANG L X, et al. Current status and distribution of hip fractures among older adults in China[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2021, 32(9): 1785-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05849-y
[3]	刘志伟, 叶欣, 高嘉琪, 等. 2009—2019年北京地区老年髋部骨折流行病学特点及年度变化趋势分析[J]. 北京医学, 2022, 44(6): 494-498. LIU Z W, YE X, GAO J Q, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and annual change trends of hip fractures in the elderly in some areas of Beijing from 2009 to 2019[J]. Beijing Medical Journal, 2022, 44(6): 494-498.
[4]	黎淑琴, 梁泳儿, 刘碧玉, 等. 基于多学科协作下的护理干预在预防老年人髋部骨折肺部感染的应用价值[J]. 山西大同大学学报: 自然科学版, 2023, 39(1): 73-76. LI S Q, LIANG Y E, LIU B Y, et al. Application Value of nursing intervention based on multidisciplinary collaboration in the prevention of pulmonary infection after hip fracture in the elderly[J]. Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 39(1): 73-76.
[5]	王振威, 艾笛, 张腾, 等. 多学科协作诊疗模式在老年髋部骨折治疗中的应用[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2020, 22(3): 200-201, 205. WANG Z W, AI D, ZHANG T, et al. Multidisciplinary team for treatment of hip fracture in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2020, 22(3): 200-201, 205.
[6]	王芳, 顾纪芳, 刘庆芬, 等. 多学科合作的流程管理在急诊危重症患者院内转运中的应用效果[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(4): 674-677. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000764 WANG F, GU J F, LIU Q F, et al. Application effect of multidisciplinary cooperation process management in emergency critical care patients in hospital transportation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(4): 674-677. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000764
[7]	RODRÍGUEZ-HERRERA C, LÓPEZ-JIMÉNEZ J J, DEL TORO-VALERO A, et al. The Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scales in a Mexican Oncology Hospital[J]. African Health Sciences, 2021, 21(1): 60-66. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i1.10
[8]	GONG X F, LI X P, ZHANG L X, et al. Current status and distribution of hip fractures among older adults in China[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2021, 32(9): 1785-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05849-y
[9]	白颖, 于淼淼, 周宁, 等. 老年髋部骨折术后低磷血症的发生及对预后的影响[J]. 青岛大学学报(医学版), 2023, 59(2): 278-281. BAI Y, YU M M, ZHOU N, et al. Hypophosphatemia after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients and its influence on prognosis[J]. Journal of Qingdao University(Medical Sciences), 2023, 59(2): 278-281.
[10]	GRIFFITHS R, BABU S, DIXON P, et al. Guideline for the management of hip fractures 2020: guideline by the association of anaesthetists[J]. Anaesthesia, 2021, 76(2): 225-237. doi: 10.1111/anae.15291
[11]	刘海龙, 王志聪, 陈曦, 等. 老年髋部骨折患者受伤至入院时间与下肢深静脉血栓形成的关系[J]. 山东医药, 2022, 62(17): 69-72. LIU H L, WANG Z C, CHEN X, et al. Relationship between time of injury to hospital admission and deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity in patients with hip fracture[J]. Shandong Medical Journal, 2022, 62(17): 69-72.
[12]	周洋洋, 芮云峰, 鲁攀攀, 等. 多学科协作诊疗模式在老年髋部骨折临床应用中的研究进展[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2020, 34(1): 132-138. ZHOU Y Y, RUI Y F, LU P P, et al. Research progress of multidisciplinary team co-management models for geriatric hip fracture treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2020, 34(1): 132-138.
[13]	SHIGEMOTO K, SAWAGUCHI T, HORⅡ T, et al. Multidisciplinary care model for geriatric patients with hip fracture in Japan: 5-year experience[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2022, 142(9): 2205-2214.
[14]	井鸿雁, 赵文波, 李晓微. 老年髋骨骨折患者多学科协作模式的应用研究进展[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1341-1343. JIN H Y, ZHAO W B, LI X W. Progress on application of multidisciplinary collaboration in elderly patients with hip fracture[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, 2020, 36(6): 1341-1343.
[15]	庞增林, 马才英, 火东旭, 等. 多学科协作模式在老年髋部骨折中的研究进展[J]. 甘肃医药, 2023, 42(2): 106-108. PANG Z L, MA C Y, HUO D X, et al. Research progress of multidisciplinary cooperation model in elderly hip fracture[J]. Gansu Medical Journal, 2023, 42(2): 106-108.
[16]	王志清. 基于MDT的医护一体信息化护理模式应用于老年髋部骨折的效果[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2023, 36(10): 1746-1748. WANG Z Q. Effect of MDT-based integrated information nursing model applied to elderly hip fracture[J]. The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice, 2023, 36(10): 1746-1748.
[17]	PATEL J N, KLEIN D S, SREEKUMAR S, et al. Outcomes in multidisciplinary team-based approach in geriatric hip fracture care: a systematic review[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2020, 28(3): 128-133. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00425
[18]	KULSHRESTHA V, SOOD M, KUMAR S, et al. Outcomes of fast-track multidisciplinary care of hip fractures in veterans: a geriatric hip fracture program report[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(4): 388-395. doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.388
[19]	孙新立, 王剑, 赵志彩, 等. 多学科协作绿色通道对老年创伤性髋部骨折手术治疗疗效及术后预后水平的影响[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2020, 22(11): 814-818. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2020.11.004 SUN X L, WANG J, ZHAO Z C, et al. Effect of multi-disciplinary collaborative green channel on prognosis of traumatic hip fracture in the elderly[J]. Journal of Traumatic Surgery, 2020, 22(11): 814-818. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2020.11.004
[20]	王国强, 马斌, 乔绍文. 多科室协作模式与传统会诊模式治疗老年髋部骨折的对比分析[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2022, 38(1): 6-8. WANG G Q, MA B, QIAO S W. Comparison of multidisciplinary orthogeriatric management versus conventional care modes in treatment of hip fracture in the elderly[J]. Journal of Baotou Medical College, 2022, 38(1): 6-8.