留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

深度肌松对硬质支气管镜治疗术中常频喷射通气效果的影响

任秋生 王艳芳 黄丽君 顾霄 王华英 彭卫东

任秋生, 王艳芳, 黄丽君, 顾霄, 王华英, 彭卫东. 深度肌松对硬质支气管镜治疗术中常频喷射通气效果的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(10): 1679-1682. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003199
引用本文: 任秋生, 王艳芳, 黄丽君, 顾霄, 王华英, 彭卫东. 深度肌松对硬质支气管镜治疗术中常频喷射通气效果的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(10): 1679-1682. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003199
REN Qiusheng, WANG Yanfang, HUANG Lijun, GU Xiao, WANG Huaying, PENG Weidong. Effect of deep muscle relaxation on oxygenation of jet ventilation during rigid bronchoscopy procedures[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(10): 1679-1682. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003199
Citation: REN Qiusheng, WANG Yanfang, HUANG Lijun, GU Xiao, WANG Huaying, PENG Weidong. Effect of deep muscle relaxation on oxygenation of jet ventilation during rigid bronchoscopy procedures[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(10): 1679-1682. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003199

深度肌松对硬质支气管镜治疗术中常频喷射通气效果的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003199
基金项目: 

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2021KY332

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    任秋生,E-mail:renqiusheng1971@yahoo.com

  • 中图分类号: R614  R768.1

Effect of deep muscle relaxation on oxygenation of jet ventilation during rigid bronchoscopy procedures

  • 摘要:   目的  硬质支气管镜手术中喷射通气最佳条件仍未明确,本研究探讨硬质支气管镜术中深度肌松对喷射通气氧合效果的影响。  方法  选择2021年1月—2022年12月宁波大学附属人民医院择期行全身麻醉下经硬质支气管镜中央气道病变治疗患者68例,采用随机数字表法分为2组:深度肌松组(D组,34例)和中度肌松组(M组,34例)。患者全麻诱导后插入硬质支气管镜行喷射通气,M组采用4个成串刺激(TOF)测定肌松深度,维持TOF计数为1~2;D组采用强直刺激后单刺激肌颤搐计数(PTC)测定肌松深度,维持PTC在1~2。术毕阿托品、新斯的明拮抗残余肌松。  结果  2组患者整体手术时间、手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);D组麻醉时间小于M组(P < 0.01);D组苏醒时间、拔管时间、肌松剂用量大于M组(均P < 0.05);D组患者术中缺氧事件[(2.7±0.6)次/人]、采取缺氧干预措施(27/33)、手术暂停时间[(7.6±3.5)min]均小于M组[(8.8±2.6)次/人、33/33、(19.3±5.6)min],且术者满意度评分[(9.4±0.5)分]高于M组[(6.2±1.5)分,P < 0.05];D组动脉血氧分压在喷射通气15、30 min时间点高于M组(均P < 0.05);D组术后咽喉疼痛例数(18/33)少于M组(26/33,P=0.037)。  结论  硬质支气管镜治疗术中应用深度肌松可以改善喷射通气的氧合效果,减少缺氧事件、手术暂停时间及麻醉时间,提高术者满意度,对整体手术时间无影响。

     

  • 表  1  2组中央气道病变患者一般资料比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of general characteristics between two groups of patients with central airway lesions

    组别 例数 性别(女性/男性,例) 年龄(x±s,岁) 身高(x±s,cm) 体重(x±s,kg) ASA分级(Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ,例) FEV1/FVC (x±s,%) 氧分压(x±s,mmHg)
    D组 33 9/24 62±5 168±6 57±6 0/9/24 85±4 81±5
    M组 33 11/22 64±6 169±5 59±7 1/10/22 83±5 83±6
    统计量 0.287a 1.471b 0.736b 1.868b 0.481c 1.794b 1.471b
    P 0.592 0.146 0.465 0.066 0.631 0.078 0.146
    注:a为χ2值,bt值,cZ值。1 mmHg=0.133 kPa。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  2组中央气道病变患者麻醉手术情况比较(x±s)

    Table  2.   Comparison of anesthetic surgical conditions between two groups of patients with central airway lesions (x±s)

    组别 例数 整体手术时间(min) 手术时间(min) 麻醉时间(min) 苏醒时间(min) 拔管时间(min) 肌松剂用量(mg) 术者满意度评分(分)
    D组 33 147±20 93±15 101±9 25±7 30±6 32±5 9.4±0.5
    M组 33 152±22 97±17 117±13 17±5 21±4 22±4 6.2±1.5
    t 0.996 1.014 5.729 5.342 7.170 8.972 11.626
    P 0.338 0.315 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  2组中央气道病变患者缺氧情况、干预措施及手术暂停时间比较

    Table  3.   Comparison of hypoxia, interventions and surgical pause time in patients with central airway lesions between two groups

    组别 例数 缺氧事件(x±s,次/人) 最低SpO2 (x±s,%) 缺氧例数(例) 干预措施(例) 暂停时间(x±s,min)
    轻度缺氧 严重缺氧 人工通气 紧闭通气 气管插管
    D组 33 2.7±0.6 86±5 26 1 24 3 0 7.6±3.5
    M组 33 8.8±2.6 83±6 31 2 27 5 1 19.3±5.6
    统计量 13.133a 2.207a 6.919b 7.693b 10.178a
    P < 0.001 0.031 0.024 0.034 < 0.001
    注:at值,b为χ2值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  2组中央气道病变患者动脉血气分析检测结果比较(x±s,mmHg)

    Table  4.   Comparison of arterial blood gas analysis results between two groups of patients with central airway disease (x±s, mmHg)

    组别 例数 氧分压 二氧化碳分压
    T0 T1 T2 T3 T0 T1 T2 T3
    D组 33 82±5 83±7 82±6 104±17 42±4 48±6 47±7 42±5
    M组 33 84±6 71±6 69±5 97±15 40±5 49±6 49±6 44±6
    t 1.471 7.477 9.562 1.774 1.794 0.736 1.246 1.471
    P 0.146 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.081 0.078 0.465 0.217 0.146
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  2组中央气道病变患者术后并发症及住院时间比较

    Table  5.   Comparison of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay between two groups of patients with central airway disease

    组别 例数 咽喉疼痛(例) 气压伤(例) 呼吸衰竭(例) 再次手术(例) 住院时间(x±s,d)
    D组 33 18 1 1 0 8.7±3.1
    M组 33 26 0 2 1 9.2±3.6
    统计量 4.364a 0.605c
    P 0.037 0.999b 0.999b 0.999b 0.548
    注:a为χ2值, b为使用Fisher精确检验,ct值。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] MATUS J, WILTON S, HO E, et al. Current practices supporting rigid bronchoscopy-an international survey[J]. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol, 2022, 12(8): 836-847.
    [2] ROSELL A, STRATAKOS G. Therapeutic bronchoscopy for central airway diseases[J]. Eur Respir Rev, 2020, 29(158): 190178. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0178-2019.
    [3] 丁群力, 杨莉, 王海, 等. 超声支气管镜引导下针吸活检术对孤立性纵隔/肺门淋巴结肿大的诊断价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(4): 574-577. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002403

    DING L Q, YANG L, WANG H, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of isolated mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(4): 574-577. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002403
    [4] ABDELMALAK B B, DOYLE D J. Updates and controversies in anesthesia for advanced interventional pulmonology procedures[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2021, 34(4): 455-463. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001029
    [5] FORTIN M, YARMUS L, RENDINA E A, et al. Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of adverse events following rigid tracheobronchoscopy[J]. Respirology, 2021, 26(1): 87-91. doi: 10.1111/resp.13873
    [6] KOO B W, OH A Y, NA H S, et al. Effects of depth of neuromuscular block on surgical conditions during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Anaesthesia, 2018, 73(9): 1090-1096. doi: 10.1111/anae.14304
    [7] REIJNDERS-BOERBOOM G, VAN HELDEN E V, MINNEE R C, et al. Deep neuromuscular block reduces the incidence of intra-operative complications during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Perioper Med(Lond), 2021, 10(1): 56. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00224-1
    [8] 周影, 韩伟. 深度肌松联合低气腹压用于肥胖患者妇科腹腔镜手术的效果[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2019, 39(6): 4-7. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10183-1020818396.htm

    ZHOU Y, HAN W. Efficacy of deep neuromuscular blockade combined with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for gyne-cological laparoscopic surgery in obese patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology, 2019, 39(6): 4-7. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10183-1020818396.htm
    [9] SHAO L J, HONG F X, LIU F K, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2021, 9(20): 5479-5489. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5479
    [10] 胡夏娟, 尹加林, 张勇, 等. 不同流速快充式经鼻湿化高流量通气在无痛胃镜检查中预防低氧血症的效果比较[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2022, 39(4): 313-317.

    HU X J, YIN J L, ZHANG Y, et al. Comparison of different flow rates of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange for prevention of hypoxemia in painless gastroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy, 2022, 39(4): 313-317.
    [11] DOYLE D J, HANTZAKOS A G. Anesthetic management of the narrowed airway[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2019, 52(6): 1127-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2019.08.010
    [12] LEITER R, ALIVERTI A, PRIORI R, et al. Comparison of superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation with conventional jet ventilation for laryngeal surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2012, 108(4): 690-697. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer460
    [13] WAHIDI M M, HERTH F J F, CHEN A, et al. State of the art: interventional pulmonology[J]. Chest, 2020, 157(3): 724-736. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.013
    [14] MYINT C W, TENG S E, BUTLER J J, et al. Low pressure low frequency jet ventilation: techniques, safety and complications[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2022, 131(12): 1346-1352. doi: 10.1177/00034894211072630
    [15] RICHEBE P, BOUSETTE N, FORTIER L P. A narrative review on the potential benefits and limitations of deep neuromuscular blockade[J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2021, 40(4): 100915. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100915.
    [16] KATHOPOULIS N, PROTOPAPAS A, STAMATAKIS E, et al. Deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade in gynecologic laparoscopic operations: randomized controlled trial[J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12(4): 561.
    [17] LEE B J, LEE H N, CHUNG J Y, et al. Effect of deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade on quantitatively assessed postoperative atelectasis using computed tomography in thoracic surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled trial[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(15): 3228. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153228.
    [18] MONACO V, STEFANINI C. Assessing the tidal volume through wearables: a scoping review[J]. Sensors(Basel), 2021, 21(12): 4124. DOI: 10.3390/s21124124.
    [19] RIEDEL T, BURGI F, GREIF R, et al. Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: a single-center randomized controlled trial[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(9): e0273120. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273120.
  • 加载中
表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  108
  • HTML全文浏览量:  36
  • PDF下载量:  12
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-03-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-11-23

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回