E-Coach模式结合动态血糖管理对重症糖尿病患者外周血糖脂水平的影响

陈瑜; 王琼; 邢红叶

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003183

E-Coach模式结合动态血糖管理对重症糖尿病患者外周血糖脂水平的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003183

宁波市第二医院重症医学科，浙江宁波 315000

基金项目:

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2023KY1099

详细信息

通讯作者:
陈瑜，E-mail: chenyuicu@163.com

中图分类号: R473.5 R587.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 118
- HTML全文浏览量: 26
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-05-15
- 网络出版日期: 2023-10-19

Effect of E-Coach mode combined with dynamic glucose management on peripheral blood glucose and lipid levels in patients with severe diabetes

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的分析E-Coach模式结合动态血糖管理对重症糖尿病患者外周血糖脂水平的影响，为临床提供更适合的血糖管理方法。方法采用便利抽样法，选取2022年3月—2023年3月宁波市第二医院重症医学科收治的100例重症糖尿病患者作为研究对象，根据随机数字表法将其分为对照组(50例)和观察组(50例)。对照组应用传统血糖管理，观察组在对照组基础上应用E-Coach模式结合动态血糖管理。观察2组患者干预前后外周血空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2 h血糖(2hPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)指标，以及治疗依从性及护理满意度。结果干预后，观察组外周血FBG、2hPG及HbA1c水平均低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)；干预后，观察组外周血TG、LDL-C低于对照组，HDL-C高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)；观察组患者治疗依从性为90%(45/50)，高于对照组的74%(37/50)，且观察组患者护理满意度为92%(46/50)，高于对照组的76%(38/50)，差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)。结论 E-Coach模式结合动态血糖管理相较于常规护理更有利于改善ICU糖尿病患者外周血糖脂水平，有助于提高患者的治疗依从性及护理满意度。
- 糖尿病 /
- E-Coach模式 /
- 动态血糖管理 /
- 重症 /
- 外周血糖脂水平
Abstract: Objective To analyze the effect of E-Coach mode combined with dynamic glucose management on peripheral blood glucose and lipid levels in patients with severe diabetes, and to provide more suitable blood glucose management methods for clinical practice. Methods A convenient sampling method was used to select 100 patients with severe diabetes who were admitted to the Intensive Care Medicine of Ningbo Second Hospital from March 2022 to March 2023 as the research objects. According to the random number table, they were divided into a control group and an observation group with 50 patients in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with traditional blood glucose management, while patients in the observation group were treated with E-Coach mode combined with dynamic blood glucose management based on the control group. The changes of peripheral blood fasting blood sugar (FBG), 2 h blood glucose (2hPG), glycated hemoglobin, triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), treatment compliance and nursing satisfaction were observed before and after the intervention in the two groups. Results After intervention, the levels of peripheral blood FBG, 2hPG, and HbA1c were compared between the two groups, and the observation group was lower than the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05); The TG and LDL-C in peripheral blood of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the HDL-C was higher than that of the control group (all P < 0.05). The treatment compliance of the observation group was 90% (45/50), which was higher than 74% (37/50) of the control group, and the nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 92% (46/50), which was higher than 76% (38/50) of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Conclusion E-Coach mode combined with dynamic blood glucose management is more conducive to improving the peripheral blood glucose and lipid levels of ICU diabetes patients than conventional nursing care, which is conducive to improving patients' treatment compliance and nursing satisfaction.
- Diabetes /
- E-Coach mode /
- Dynamic blood glucose management /
- Severe illness /
- Peripheral blood glucose and lipid levels

HTML全文

表 1 2组重症糖尿病患者一般资料比较

Table 1. Comparison of general data between two groupsof patients with severe diabetes(x±s)

组别	例数	性别(例)		年龄 (x±s，岁)	病程 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，年]	合并症(例)
组别	例数	男性	女性	年龄 (x±s，岁)	病程 [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，年]	肾病	神经病变	冠心病
对照组	50	33	17	65.64±13.43	15(4，18)	24	14	7
观察组	50	35	15	66.20±13.49	16(6，20)	22	15	7
统计量		0.184^a		0.208^b	0.071^c	0.110^a
P值		0.668		0.836	0.846	0.946
注：^a为χ²值，^b为t值，^c为Z值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组重症糖尿病患者干预前后外周血糖指标比较(x±s)

Table 2. Comparison of peripheral blood glucose indicators between two groups of patients before and after intervention(x±s)

组别	例数	FBG(mmol/L)		2hPG(mmol/L)		HbA1c(%)
组别	例数	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后
对照组	50	11.97±3.26	9.15±1.21	15.62±3.39	12.13±2.10	10.42±2.71	8.80±2.15
观察组	50	10.83±4.54	8.06±0.89	15.02±3.73	10.47±1.66	9.83±1.33	7.76±1.29
t值		1.442	5.131	0.842	4.385	1.382	2.933
P值		0.152	< 0.001	0.402	< 0.001	0.170	0.004

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组重症糖尿病患者干预前后外周血血脂指标比较(mmol/L)

Table 3. Comparison of peripheral blood lipid indicators between two groups of patients before and after intervention(mmol/L)

组别	例数	TC(x±s)		TG[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]		LDL-C(x±s)		HDL-C(x±s)
组别	例数	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后	干预前	干预后
对照组	50	4.01±1.38	3.31±1.37	2.55(1.95，3.42)	1.88(1.22，2.06)	2.38±1.07	2.15±0.95	1.36±0.58	1.44±0.56
观察组	50	4.17±1.36	3.16±1.21	2.50(1.91，3.37)	1.32(0.94，1.75)	2.36±0.94	1.65±0.60	1.53±0.52	1.83±0.53
统计量		0.584^a	0.580^a	0.317^b	3.872^b	0.099^a	3.147^a	1.543^a	3.577^a
P值		0.561	0.563	0.804	0.005	0.921	0.002	0.126	0.001
注：^a为t值，^b为Z值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	周燕, 周佩如, 卢筱华, 等. 多学科协作下糖尿病合并多种急危重症患者的院内血糖管理[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(10): 924-928. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX202010018.htm ZHOU Y, ZHOU P R, LU X H, et al. Blood glucose management in hospital of diabetes patients with multiple acute and critical diseases under multidisciplinary cooperation[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2020, 35(10): 924-928. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX202010018.htm
[2]	邢晓菡. 系统护理对行血糖监测的重症糖尿病患者心理状态及治疗依从性的影响[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(19): 3322-3324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2020.19.041 XING X H. The effect of systematic nursing on the mental state and treatment compliance of patients with severe diabetes undergoing blood glucose monitoring[J]. Chongqing Medicine, 2020, 49(19): 3322-3324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2020.19.041
[3]	邹素珍, 叶琼, 吴淋淋, 等. 个性化营养支持对妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖和并发症的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(3): 438-441. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002902 ZOU S Z, YE Q, WU L L, et al. The effect of personalized nutritional support on blood sugar and complications of pregnant women with diabetes[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(3): 438-441. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002902
[4]	BEUN R J, LUITEN C, VERBEEK C, et al. A rationale for a gamified e-coach application to decrease the consumption of sugar sweetened beverages[J]. Front Digit Health, 2021, 18(2): 564529. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.564529.
[5]	HAPPE L, SGRAJA M, HEIN A, et al. Iterative Development and applicability of a tablet-based e-coach for older adults in rehabilitation units to improve nutrition and physical activity: usability study[J]. JMIR Hum Factors, 2022, 9(1): e31823. DOI: 10.2196/31823.
[6]	中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2021, 13(4): 315-409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYX202112018.htm Diabetes Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 diabetes in China (2020 Edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of diabetes, 2021, 13(4): 315-409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYX202112018.htm
[7]	杨丹, 张艳, 张媛媛, 等. 动态血糖监测对2型糖尿病病人糖脂代谢及自我管理能力的影响[J]. 护理研究, 2022, 36(3): 528-530. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202203029.htm YANG D, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Effect of dynamic blood glucose monitoring on glucose and lipid metabolism and self-management ability of patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2022, 36(3): 528-530. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202203029.htm
[8]	施华芳, 姜冬九, 李乐之, 等. 病人依从性的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2003, 38(2): 134-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL200302026.htm SHI H F, JIANG D J, LI L Z, et al. Research progress on patient compliance[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2003, 38(2): 134-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL200302026.htm
[9]	HAPPE L, HEIN A, DIEKMANN R. What do geriatric rehabilitation patients and experts consider relevant? Requirements for a digitalised e-coach for sustainable improvement of nutrition and physical activity in older adults-a qualitative focus group study[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2021, 21(1): 712.
[10]	张雅文, 张琼月, 陶珺珺, 等. 基于动态血糖监测系统的2型糖尿病患者低血糖发作的相关因素[J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2021, 48(5): 637-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYK202105012.htm ZHANG Y W, ZHANG Q Y, TAO J J, et al. Related factors of hypoglycemia attack in type 2 diabetes patients based on dynamic glucose monitoring system[J]. Journal of Fudan University (Medical Edition), 2021, 48(5): 637-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYK202105012.htm
[11]	杜少斐, 王志宏. 互联网+管理模式对社区老年2型糖尿病患者相关指标的影响[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2022, 43(14): 57-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYYX202214015.htm DU S F, WANG Z H. Effects of Internet plus management mode on elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in community [J]. Journal of Medical Forum, 2022, 43(14): 57-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYYX202214015.htm
[12]	周爱锋, 孙侠, 孙中英, 等. 基于E-Coach慢性病管理对糖尿病自我效能及血糖的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2022, 41(18): 3414-3417. ZHOU A F, SUN X, SUN Z Y, et al. Based on the influence of E-Coach chronic disease management on diabetes self-efficacy and blood glucose[J]. International Journal of Nursing, 2022, 41(18): 3414-3417.
[13]	任淑琴. 系统护理干预对行实时动态血糖监测危重糖尿病患者的干预效果分析[J]. 中国基层医药, 2019, 26(8): 1011-1013. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TNBX202108034.htm REN S Q. Intervention effect of systematic nursing intervention on patients with critical diabetes mellitus monitored by real time dynamic blood glucose monitoring[J]. Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy, 2019, 26(8): 1011-1013. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TNBX202108034.htm
[14]	郭风先, 马晓鑫, 胡广倩, 等. 奥马哈系统干预模式对接受实时动态血糖监测联合持续皮下注射胰岛素疗法的2型糖尿病患者的影响[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(22): 2039-2043. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX202022005.htm GUO F X, MA X X, HU G Q, et al. The effect of Omaha system intervention mode on type 2 diabetes patients receiving real-time dynamic blood glucose monitoring combined with continuous subcutaneous insulin injection[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2020, 35(22): 2039-2043. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX202022005.htm
[15]	江虹, 丁福, 朱跃平, 等. E-Coach慢病管理模式在高血压控制中的应用研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(10): 30-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201910011.htm JIANG H, DING F, ZHU Y P, et al. Application of E-Coach chronic disease management model in hypertension control[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2019, 34(10): 30-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201910011.htm
[16]	李晶, 王梵, 李想, 等. 动态血糖监测系统在围手术期患者中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2022, 28(34): 4848-4851. LI J, WANG F, LI X, et al. Research progress on the application of dynamic blood glucose monitoring system in perioperative patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 2022, 28(34): 4848-4851.
[17]	李艳霞. E-Coach慢性病管理模式对老年原发性高血压病患者自我管理能力的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2020, 17(22): 41-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLSJ202022017.htm LI Y X. The impact of E-Cach chronic disease management model on self-management ability of elderly patients with primary hypertension[J]. Nursing Practice and Research, 2020, 17(22): 41-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLSJ202022017.htm
[18]	蔡玉立, 易波, 陈小琳, 等. 动态血糖监测技术与临床研究进展[J]. 中国糖尿病杂志, 2021, 29(12): 933-940. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTL202112011.htm CAI Y L, YI B, CHENG X L, et al. Dynamic blood glucose monitoring technology and clinical research progress[J]. Chinese Journal of diabetes, 2021, 29(12): 933-940. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGTL202112011.htm
[19]	王丽, 杜叶平, 李倩, 等. 重症心衰患者发生房颤的危险因素及E-Coach管理模式干预的有效性[J]. 心血管康复医学杂志, 2022, 31(5): 538-542. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXGK202205002.htm WANG L, DU Y P, LI Q, et al. Risk factors for atrial fibrillation in patients with severe heart failure and the effectiveness of E-Cach management model intervention[J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine, 2022, 31(5): 538-542. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXGK202205002.htm
[20]	江虹, 丁福, 朱跃平, 等. E-Coach慢性病管理模式的构建及其在高血压患者管理中的应用[J]. 中国护理管理, 2019, 19(9): 1361-1366. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLHL201909023.htm JIANG H, DING F, ZHU Y P, et al. Application of E-Coach chronic disease management model in hypertension control[J]. China Nursing Management, 2019, 19(9): 1361-1366. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLHL201909023.htm