Predictive value of uterine artery ultrasound parameter prediction model for preeclampsia risk in early pregnancy
-
摘要:
目的 本研究为探明孕11~13周子宫动脉超声参数预测子痫前期的价值,构建了孕11~13周子宫动脉超声参数预测模型,并分析其对子痫前期风险的预测价值。 方法 纳入2020年5月—2022年5月湖州市妇幼保健院就诊的200例孕早期患者为研究对象,根据患者是否发生子痫前期分为发生组(100例)和未发生组(100例),从电子病历系统中提取患者孕11~13周子宫动脉超声参数指标,建立基于孕早期子宫动脉超声参数的logistic回归预测模型,并绘制ROC曲线分析其预测子痫前期的敏感度、特异度。 结果 多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,高体重指数(BMI,OR=1.311,P<0.001)、高胆固醇(OR=1.673,P=0.004)、高子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI,OR=1.327,P<0.001)、高阻力指数(RI,OR=1.846,P=0.036)是子痫前期发生的危险因素;ROC曲线分析显示,该模型预测子痫前期发生风险的AUC为0.762(95% CI:0.696~0.819),敏感度为81.00%,特异度为63.00%。 结论 基于孕早期子宫动脉超声参数UtA-PI、RI及高BMI、胆固醇建立的预测模型可用于子痫前期的预测。 Abstract:Objective To explore the value of uterine artery ultrasound parameters in the prediction of preeclampsia at 11-13 weeks of gestation, we constructed a uterine artery ultrasound parameter prediction model at 11-13 weeks of gestation, and analyzed its prediction value for the risk of preeclampsia. Methods A total of 200 patients who visited Huzhou Women's and Children's Health Care Hospital in early pregnancy from May 2020 to May 2022 were included. They were divided into occurred group (100 cases) and not occurred group (100 cases) according to whether they had preeclampsia. The ultrasonic parameters of uterine artery in the 11-13 weeks of pregnancy were extracted from the electronic medical record system, and a logistic regression prediction model based on the ultrasonic parameters of uterine artery in early pregnancy was established. The ROC curve was drawn to analyze its sensitivity and specificity for predicting preeclampsia. Results The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high body mass index (BMI, OR=1.311, P<0.001), high cholesterol (OR=1.673, P=0.004), high uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI, OR=1.327, P<0.001) and high resistance index (RI, OR=1.846, P=0.036) were the risk factors for preeclampsia. ROC curve showed that the AUC of the model for predicting the risk of preeclampsia was 0.762 (95% CI: 0.696-0.819), the sensitivity was 81.00%, and the specificity was 63.00%. Conclusion The prediction model based on uterine artery ultrasound parameters UtA-PI, RI, high BMI and cholesterol in early pregnancy can be used for the prediction of preeclampsia. -
Key words:
- Early pregnancy /
- Uterine artery ultrasound /
- Preeclampsia /
- Prediction model
-
表 1 2组孕早期患者临床资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of clinical data between two groups in early pregnancy
项目 未发生组
(n=100)发生组
(n=100)统计量 P值 年龄(x±s,岁) 27.47±2.89 30.00±4.75 4.550a <0.001 BMI(x±s) 26.52±3.31 30.22±4.49 6.633a <0.001 孕次[例(%)] 1.228b 0.268 ≤2次 86(86.00) 91(91.00) ≥3次 14(14.00) 6(6.00) 受孕方法[例(%)] 1.802b 0.179 自然受孕 90(90.00) 95(95.00) 人工受孕 10(10.00) 5(5.00) 收缩压(x±s,mmHg) 120.93±9.77 128.57±18.11 3.713a <0.001 舒张压(x±s,mmHg) 72.58±7.82 84.99±14.87 7.387a <0.001 PT(x±s,s) 10.48±0.86 10.69±0.83 1.757a 0.080 胆固醇(x±s,mmol/L) 6.01±0.91 6.57±1.59 3.057a 0.003 肌酐(x±s,μmmol/L) 48.78±17.71 52.82±15.70 1.707a 0.089 UtA-PI(x±s) 1.65±0.41 1.79±0.54 2.065a 0.040 RI(x±s) 0.71±0.17 0.76±0.15 2.205a 0.029 S/D(x±s) 4.28±1.26 4.59±1.00 1.927a 0.055 注:a为t值,b为χ2值。1 mmHg=0.133 kPa。 表 2 孕期子痫前期发生风险的多因素logistic分析
Table 2. Multivariate logistic analysis of the risk of preeclampsia during pregnancy
变量 B SE Wald χ2 P值 OR值 95% CI 年龄 0.021 0.060 0.122 0.726 1.021 0.909~1.148 BMI 0.270 0.059 20.835 <0.001 1.311 1.167~1.472 收缩压 -0.012 0.018 0.447 0.504 0.988 0.955~1.023 舒张压 0.037 0.026 2.115 0.146 1.038 0.987~1.091 胆固醇 0.514 0.178 8.357 0.004 1.673 1.180~2.371 UtA-PI 0.283 0.070 16.198 <0.001 1.327 1.156~1.522 RI 0.613 0.292 4.410 0.036 1.846 1.342~2.270 -
[1] 王媛, 唐慧荣, 王娅, 等. 孕期血压与妊娠期高血压或子痫前期发病关系的研究[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(11): 767-773. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210601-00297WANG Y, TANG H R, WANG Y. Association between gestational blood pressure and pregnancy induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(11): 767-773. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210601-00297 [2] 杨春丽, 杨敬敬. 超声子宫动脉搏动指数联合血清HMGB1、sCD40L对子痫前期孕妇的预测价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2021, 32(7): 513-516.YANG C L, YANG J J. Value of uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index combined with serum HMGB1 and sCD40L in predicting preeclampsia[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging, 2021, 32(7): 513-516. [3] GANA N, SARNO M, VIEIRA N, et al. Ophthalmic artery Doppler at 11-13 weeks' gestation in prediction of pre-eclampsia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 59(6): 731-736. doi: 10.1002/uog.24914 [4] WAIRACHPANICH V, PHUPONG V. Second-trimester serum high mobility group box-1 and uterine artery Doppler to predict preeclampsia[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 6886. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10861-1. [5] PLASENCIA W, MAIZ N, POON L, et al. Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks and 21 + 0 to 24 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre-eclampsia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 32(2): 138-146. doi: 10.1002/uog.5402 [6] 张翼, 刘兴会. 子痫前期的主要生物标志物预测指标及其评价[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2021, 37(11): 803-807. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2021.11.syfckzz202111002ZHANG Y, LIU X H. Prediction of major biomarkers of preeclampsia and its evaluation[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 37(11): 803-807. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2021.11.syfckzz202111002 [7] 吕鑫, 张为远, 张靖霄, 等. 早发与晚发子痫前期高危因素的对比分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(11): 760-766. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210330-00164LYU X, ZHANG W Y, ZHANG J X. Comparative analysis of high risk factors between early-onset pre-eclampsia and late-onset pre-eclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 56(11): 760-766. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210330-00164 [8] 孙秀荣, 张杰生, 邓宇傲. 指端容积血流脉动波、子宫动脉多普勒联合sFlt-1/PlGF比值对早发型子痫前期的预测[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2021, 18(3): 31-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-016X.2021.03.009SUN X R, ZHANG J S, DENG Y A. The predictive value of combined detection of uterine artery ultrasound, photoplethysmography and sFlt-1/PlGF for early onset preeclampsia[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science), 2021, 18(3): 31-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-016X.2021.03.009 [9] 谢彬, 李傲霜, 万红芳, 等. 外周血LOX-1、PAPP-A联合超声检查子宫动脉PI对子痫前期的预测价值[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2021, 34(3): 96-100.XIE B, LI A S, WANG H F, et al. Predictive Value of LOX-1 and PAPP-A in Peripheral Blood Combined with PI as Derived from Ultrasoundfor Pre-eclampsia[J]. Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy, 2021, 34(3): 96-100. [10] CLARK A R, JAMES J L, STEVENSON G N, et al. Understanding abnormal uterine artery Doppler waveforms: a novel computational model to explore potential causes within the utero-placental vasculature[J]. Placenta, 2018, 66(1): 74-81. [11] EL-SAYED A. Preeclampsia: a review of the pathogenesis and possible management strategies based on its pathophysiological derangements[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 56(5): 593-598. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.08.004 [12] PETURSDOTTIR M H, SUNDSTROM P I, LINDSTROM L, et al. Ultrasound estimated subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue thicknesses and risk of pre-eclampsia[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 22740. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02208-z. [13] KALAFAT E, LAORETI A, KHALIL A, et al. Ophthalmic artery Doppler for prediction of pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 51(6): 731-737. doi: 10.1002/uog.19002 [14] 储华, 陆艳, 刘明松. 孕期子宫动脉超声参数动态分析与子痫前期风险的相关性研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(9): 1545-1547, 1582. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002645CHU H, LU Y, LIU M S. The correlation between the dynamic analysis of uterine artery ultrasound parameters during pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(9): 1545-1547, 1582. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002645 [15] ANTONIC T D, ARDALIC D Č, VLADIMIROV S S, et al. Cholesterol homeostasis is dysregulated in women with preeclampsia[J]. Pol Arch Intern Med, 2021, 131(12): 16144. DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16144. -