留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

孕早期子宫动脉超声参数预测模型对子痫前期风险的预测价值

储华 陆艳 刘明松

储华, 陆艳, 刘明松. 孕早期子宫动脉超声参数预测模型对子痫前期风险的预测价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(9): 1563-1565. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003171
引用本文: 储华, 陆艳, 刘明松. 孕早期子宫动脉超声参数预测模型对子痫前期风险的预测价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(9): 1563-1565. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003171
CHU Hua, LU Yan, LIU Mingsong. Predictive value of uterine artery ultrasound parameter prediction model for preeclampsia risk in early pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(9): 1563-1565. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003171
Citation: CHU Hua, LU Yan, LIU Mingsong. Predictive value of uterine artery ultrasound parameter prediction model for preeclampsia risk in early pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(9): 1563-1565. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003171

孕早期子宫动脉超声参数预测模型对子痫前期风险的预测价值

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003171
基金项目: 

浙江省湖州市科学技术局项目 2019GYB15

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2021KY1084

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    储华,E-mail:chuhua501@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R445.1  R714.24

Predictive value of uterine artery ultrasound parameter prediction model for preeclampsia risk in early pregnancy

  • 摘要:   目的  本研究为探明孕11~13周子宫动脉超声参数预测子痫前期的价值,构建了孕11~13周子宫动脉超声参数预测模型,并分析其对子痫前期风险的预测价值。  方法  纳入2020年5月—2022年5月湖州市妇幼保健院就诊的200例孕早期患者为研究对象,根据患者是否发生子痫前期分为发生组(100例)和未发生组(100例),从电子病历系统中提取患者孕11~13周子宫动脉超声参数指标,建立基于孕早期子宫动脉超声参数的logistic回归预测模型,并绘制ROC曲线分析其预测子痫前期的敏感度、特异度。  结果  多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,高体重指数(BMI,OR=1.311,P<0.001)、高胆固醇(OR=1.673,P=0.004)、高子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI,OR=1.327,P<0.001)、高阻力指数(RI,OR=1.846,P=0.036)是子痫前期发生的危险因素;ROC曲线分析显示,该模型预测子痫前期发生风险的AUC为0.762(95% CI:0.696~0.819),敏感度为81.00%,特异度为63.00%。  结论  基于孕早期子宫动脉超声参数UtA-PI、RI及高BMI、胆固醇建立的预测模型可用于子痫前期的预测。

     

  • 图  1  孕早期子宫动脉超声参数预测子痫前期发生风险的ROC曲线

    Figure  1.  ROC curve of ultrasonic parameters of uterine artery in early pregnancy for predicting the risk of preeclampsia

    表  1  2组孕早期患者临床资料比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of clinical data between two groups in early pregnancy

    项目 未发生组
    (n=100)
    发生组
    (n=100)
    统计量 P
    年龄(x±s,岁) 27.47±2.89 30.00±4.75 4.550a <0.001
    BMI(x±s) 26.52±3.31 30.22±4.49 6.633a <0.001
    孕次[例(%)] 1.228b 0.268
       ≤2次 86(86.00) 91(91.00)
       ≥3次 14(14.00) 6(6.00)
    受孕方法[例(%)] 1.802b 0.179
       自然受孕 90(90.00) 95(95.00)
       人工受孕 10(10.00) 5(5.00)
    收缩压(x±s,mmHg) 120.93±9.77 128.57±18.11 3.713a <0.001
    舒张压(x±s,mmHg) 72.58±7.82 84.99±14.87 7.387a <0.001
    PT(x±s,s) 10.48±0.86 10.69±0.83 1.757a 0.080
    胆固醇(x±s,mmol/L) 6.01±0.91 6.57±1.59 3.057a 0.003
    肌酐(x±s,μmmol/L) 48.78±17.71 52.82±15.70 1.707a 0.089
    UtA-PI(x±s) 1.65±0.41 1.79±0.54 2.065a 0.040
    RI(x±s) 0.71±0.17 0.76±0.15 2.205a 0.029
    S/D(x±s) 4.28±1.26 4.59±1.00 1.927a 0.055
    注:at值,b为χ2值。1 mmHg=0.133 kPa。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  孕期子痫前期发生风险的多因素logistic分析

    Table  2.   Multivariate logistic analysis of the risk of preeclampsia during pregnancy

    变量 B SE Wald χ2 P OR 95% CI
    年龄 0.021 0.060 0.122 0.726 1.021 0.909~1.148
    BMI 0.270 0.059 20.835 <0.001 1.311 1.167~1.472
    收缩压 -0.012 0.018 0.447 0.504 0.988 0.955~1.023
    舒张压 0.037 0.026 2.115 0.146 1.038 0.987~1.091
    胆固醇 0.514 0.178 8.357 0.004 1.673 1.180~2.371
    UtA-PI 0.283 0.070 16.198 <0.001 1.327 1.156~1.522
    RI 0.613 0.292 4.410 0.036 1.846 1.342~2.270
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王媛, 唐慧荣, 王娅, 等. 孕期血压与妊娠期高血压或子痫前期发病关系的研究[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(11): 767-773. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210601-00297

    WANG Y, TANG H R, WANG Y. Association between gestational blood pressure and pregnancy induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(11): 767-773. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210601-00297
    [2] 杨春丽, 杨敬敬. 超声子宫动脉搏动指数联合血清HMGB1、sCD40L对子痫前期孕妇的预测价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2021, 32(7): 513-516.

    YANG C L, YANG J J. Value of uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index combined with serum HMGB1 and sCD40L in predicting preeclampsia[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging, 2021, 32(7): 513-516.
    [3] GANA N, SARNO M, VIEIRA N, et al. Ophthalmic artery Doppler at 11-13 weeks' gestation in prediction of pre-eclampsia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 59(6): 731-736. doi: 10.1002/uog.24914
    [4] WAIRACHPANICH V, PHUPONG V. Second-trimester serum high mobility group box-1 and uterine artery Doppler to predict preeclampsia[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 6886. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10861-1.
    [5] PLASENCIA W, MAIZ N, POON L, et al. Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks and 21 + 0 to 24 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre-eclampsia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 32(2): 138-146. doi: 10.1002/uog.5402
    [6] 张翼, 刘兴会. 子痫前期的主要生物标志物预测指标及其评价[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2021, 37(11): 803-807. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2021.11.syfckzz202111002

    ZHANG Y, LIU X H. Prediction of major biomarkers of preeclampsia and its evaluation[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 37(11): 803-807. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2021.11.syfckzz202111002
    [7] 吕鑫, 张为远, 张靖霄, 等. 早发与晚发子痫前期高危因素的对比分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(11): 760-766. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210330-00164

    LYU X, ZHANG W Y, ZHANG J X. Comparative analysis of high risk factors between early-onset pre-eclampsia and late-onset pre-eclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 56(11): 760-766. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210330-00164
    [8] 孙秀荣, 张杰生, 邓宇傲. 指端容积血流脉动波、子宫动脉多普勒联合sFlt-1/PlGF比值对早发型子痫前期的预测[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2021, 18(3): 31-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-016X.2021.03.009

    SUN X R, ZHANG J S, DENG Y A. The predictive value of combined detection of uterine artery ultrasound, photoplethysmography and sFlt-1/PlGF for early onset preeclampsia[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science), 2021, 18(3): 31-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-016X.2021.03.009
    [9] 谢彬, 李傲霜, 万红芳, 等. 外周血LOX-1、PAPP-A联合超声检查子宫动脉PI对子痫前期的预测价值[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2021, 34(3): 96-100.

    XIE B, LI A S, WANG H F, et al. Predictive Value of LOX-1 and PAPP-A in Peripheral Blood Combined with PI as Derived from Ultrasoundfor Pre-eclampsia[J]. Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy, 2021, 34(3): 96-100.
    [10] CLARK A R, JAMES J L, STEVENSON G N, et al. Understanding abnormal uterine artery Doppler waveforms: a novel computational model to explore potential causes within the utero-placental vasculature[J]. Placenta, 2018, 66(1): 74-81.
    [11] EL-SAYED A. Preeclampsia: a review of the pathogenesis and possible management strategies based on its pathophysiological derangements[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 56(5): 593-598. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.08.004
    [12] PETURSDOTTIR M H, SUNDSTROM P I, LINDSTROM L, et al. Ultrasound estimated subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue thicknesses and risk of pre-eclampsia[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 22740. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02208-z.
    [13] KALAFAT E, LAORETI A, KHALIL A, et al. Ophthalmic artery Doppler for prediction of pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 51(6): 731-737. doi: 10.1002/uog.19002
    [14] 储华, 陆艳, 刘明松. 孕期子宫动脉超声参数动态分析与子痫前期风险的相关性研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(9): 1545-1547, 1582. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002645

    CHU H, LU Y, LIU M S. The correlation between the dynamic analysis of uterine artery ultrasound parameters during pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(9): 1545-1547, 1582. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002645
    [15] ANTONIC T D, ARDALIC D Č, VLADIMIROV S S, et al. Cholesterol homeostasis is dysregulated in women with preeclampsia[J]. Pol Arch Intern Med, 2021, 131(12): 16144. DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16144.
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  131
  • HTML全文浏览量:  46
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-04-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-10-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回