Application of health management plan based on boost theory in patients with chronic diseases
-
摘要:
目的 探讨基于助推理论的健康管理方案在慢性病患者中的应用效果, 分析其对患者健康行为、健康素养、自我监测能力及服务满意度情况的影响。 方法 采用便利抽样法选取2020年7月-2023年1月绍兴第二医院收治的200例慢性病患者作为研究对象, 根据随机数字表法将其分为对照组(100例)和观察组(100例)。对照组采用常规健康管理, 观察组在对照组基础上采用基于助推理论的健康管理方案。比较2组患者干预前后健康行为、健康素养、自我监测能力及服务满意度。 结果 干预前, 2组患者健康行为、健康素养及自我监测能力评分比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);干预后, 观察组患者健康促进生活方式量表总分为(117.51±3.89)分, 高于对照组[(101.27±3.44)分, P < 0.05];干预后, 观察组患者健康素养水平高于对照组(P < 0.05);干预后, 观察组患者疾病自我监测能力得分为(8.87±0.64)分, 高于对照组[(7.33±1.26)分, P < 0.05];观察组服务满意度高于对照组(P < 0.05)。 结论 基于助推理论的健康管理方案能明显提高慢性病患者健康行为及健康素养, 有利于提高患者自我监测能力及服务满意度, 值得临床应用。 Abstract:Objective To explore the application effect of health management plans based on boosting theory in chronic disease patients, and analyze their impact on patients'health behavior, health literacy, self-monitoring ability, and service satisfaction. Methods A total of 200 patients with chronic diseases who were admitted to Shaoxing Second Hospital from July 2020 to January 2023 were selected as the research objects using the convenient sampling method, and divided into control group and observation group according to the random number table, with 100 cases in each group.The control group adopted routine health management, while the observation group adopted a health management program based on the boost theory on the basis of the control group.The health behavior, health literacy, self-monitoring ability and service satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results Before intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of health behavior, health literacy, and self-monitoring ability between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05).After intervention, the total score of the health promotion lifestyle scale for patients in the observation group was (117.51±3.89) points, which was higher than the score of the control group (101.27±3.44) points (P < 0.05);The health literacy level of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05);The self-monitoring ability score of the observation group patients was (8.87±0.64) points, which was higher than that of the control group[(7.33±1.26) points, P < 0.05];Service satisfaction in the observation group was higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The health management program based on the boost theory can significantly improve the health behavior and health literacy of patients with chronic diseases, and is conducive to improving patients'self-monitoring ability and service satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical application. -
Key words:
- Chronic disease /
- Boost theory /
- Health management /
- Healthy behavior /
- Health literacy
-
表 1 2组慢性病患者一般资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of general data of chronic disease patients in two groups
项目 对照组
(n=100)观察组
(n=100)统计量 P值 性别(例) 0.188a 0.664 男性 59 62 女性 41 38 年龄(x±s,岁) 58.77±8.94 58.81±9.61 0.053b 0.958 疾病种类(例) 0.312a 0.958 高血压 22 20 冠心病 22 25 糖尿病 36 36 脑卒中 20 19 患病个数(例) 0.085c 0.932 1个 49 47 2个 34 38 ≥3个 17 15 病程时间(x±s,年) 6.11±1.06 6.15±0.98 0.277b 0.782 注:a为χ2值,b为t值,c为Z值。 表 2 2组慢性病患者干预前后健康促进生活方式量表评分比较(x±s,分)
Table 2. Comparison of health promotion lifestyle scale scores of chronic disease patients before and after intervention in two groups(x±s, points)
组别 例数 营养 运动 人际关系 压力 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 对照组 100 8.72±1.13 10.42±1.21a 10.33±1.27 13.44±1.33a 15.41±1.53 16.80±1.72a 12.66±1.88 14.65±1.06a 观察组 100 8.75±1.09 13.11±0.74a 10.36±1.44 16.71±0.42a 15.38±1.18 18.11±1.34a 12.63±1.41 17.67±1.22a t值 0.191 18.966 0.156 23.445 0.155 6.008 0.128 18.686 P值 0.849 < 0.001 0.876 < 0.001 0.877 < 0.001 0.898 < 0.001 组别 例数 健康责任 自我实现 总分 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 对照组 100 18.71±3.17 22.31±1.85a 21.25±2.33 21.91±2.10 91.21±5.67 101.27±3.44a 观察组 100 18.75±2.55 25.13±2.42a 21.28±3.04 23.11±2.78a 91.25±5.48 117.51±3.89a t值 0.098 9.258 0.078 3.444 0.051 31.274 P值 0.922 < 0.001 0.938 0.001 0.959 < 0.001 注:与同组干预前比较,a P < 0.05。 表 3 2组慢性病患者干预前后健康素养水平比较(例)
Table 3. Comparison of health literacy level of chronic disease patients before and after intervention in two groups (cases)
组别 例数 干预前 干预后 不具备健康素养 中等健康素养 良好健康素养 不具备健康素养 中等健康素养 良好健康素养 对照组 100 20 59 21 11 50 39 观察组 100 18 62 20 2 40 58 Z值 0.162 3.814 P值 0.782 0.015 表 4 2组慢性病患者干预前后自我监测能力比较(x±s,分)
Table 4. Comparison of self-monitoring ability of chronic disease patients before and after intervention in two groups(x±s, points)
组别 例数 干预前 干预后 t值 P值 对照组 100 5.16±1.29 7.33±1.26 15.285 < 0.001 观察组 100 5.20±1.41 8.87±0.64 19.282 < 0.001 t值 0.209 10.897 P值 0.834 < 0.001 -
[1] 王丹, 张振香, 林蓓蕾, 等. 交互式语音应答系统在慢性病健康管理中的应用及研究进展[J]. 军事护理, 2022, 39(8): 78-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL202208020.htmWANG D, ZHANG Z X, LIN B L, et al. Application and research progress of interactive voice response system in chronic disease health management[J]. Journal of Nursing of the People's Liberation Army, 2022, 39(8): 78-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JFHL202208020.htm [2] 袁晓宇, 罗刚, 杨练, 等. 关于社区卫生诊断助力慢性病健康管理工作的思考与建议[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2022, 39(2): 93-96, 156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWSG202202004.htmYUAN X Y, LUO G, YANg L, et al. Reflections and Suggestions on Community Health Diagnosis Assisting Chronic Disease Health Management[J]. China Health Administration, 2022, 39(2): 93-96, 156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWSG202202004.htm [3] 刘欢, 高蓉, 蒋文慧. 基于SWOT-PEST分析模型的我国老年慢性病智慧健康管理发展对策研究[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2021, 38(3): 233-236. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWSG202103021.htmLIU H, GAO R, JIANG W H. Research on the development strategy of intelligent health management for elderly chronic diseases in China based on SWOT-PEST analysis model[J]. China Health Administration, 2021, 38(3): 233-236. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWSG202103021.htm [4] 施麟俊, 方荣华. 社区老年慢性病人群"互联网+全科团队"健康管理服务的困境及应对策略[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2021, 36(14): 1272-1275. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX202114005.htmSHI L J, FANG R H. Dilemma and coping strategies of health management service of "Internet plus+general practice team" for community elderly chronic patients[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2021, 36(14): 1272-1275. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX202114005.htm [5] 张若月. 助推理论下的商业发展战略[J]. 中国商论, 2020(24): 10-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGSM202024004.htmZHANG R Y. Business Development Strategy under the Nudge theory[J]. China Business Theory, 2020(24): 10-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGSM202024004.htm [6] 曹文君, 郭颖, 平卫伟, 等. HPLP-Ⅱ健康促进生活方式量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2016, 20(3): 286-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201603018.htmCAO W J, GUO Y, PING W W, et al. Development and performance testing of the Chinese version of the HPLP -Ⅱ Health Promotion Lifestyle Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control, 2016, 20(3): 286-289. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBKZ201603018.htm [7] 潘丽娟, 张明, 安力彬. 慢性病病人健康素养相关测评工具的研究现状[J]. 护理研究, 2015, 39(31): 3841-3845. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201531002.htmPANG L J, ZHANG M, AN L B. Research status of Health literacy related assessment tools for patients with chronic diseases[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2015, 39(31): 3841-3845. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201531002.htm [8] 耿文垚, 孙晓方, 李丽, 等. 健康行为过程取向理论及助推策略相结合的妊娠糖尿病患者饮食管理方案的构建[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(8): 1199-1204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLHL202208017.htmGENG W Y, SUN X F, LI L, et al. Construction of diet management plan for Gestational diabetes patients based on the combination of health behavior process orientation theory and promotion strategy[J]. China Nursing Management, 2022, 22(8): 1199-1204. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLHL202208017.htm [9] 孙小嫡, 李智慧, 孔燕, 等. 基于助推理论的医院-社区-家庭三联动母乳喂养干预[J]. 护理学杂志, 2023, 38(9): 81-84, 90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202309020.htmSUN X N, LI Z H, KONG Y, et al. Hospital community family triple action breastfeeding intervention based on Nudge theory[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 38(9): 81-84, 90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202309020.htm [10] 邓莹, 潘卫宇, 左珊珊, 等. 基于行动研究法的健康教育对全髋关节置换术患者术后康复的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(1): 100-103. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002822DENG Y, PAN W Y, ZUO S S, et al. The effect of health education based on Action research on postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing total hip Joint replacement[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(1): 100-103. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002822 [11] 李筱永, 吴佼玥. 助推理论背景下医保服务医师管理制度的反思与重构[J]. 中国医院管理, 2022, 42(4): 78-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYGL202204023.htmLI X Y, WU J Y. Reflection and Reconstruction of Physician Management System in Medical Insurance Service under the Background of Nudge theory[J]. China Hospital Management, 2022, 42(4): 78-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYGL202204023.htm [12] 周延风, 张婷. 助推理论及其应用研究述评与未来展望: 行为决策改变的新思路[J]. 财经论丛(浙江财经学院学报), 2019(10): 94-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLC201910010.htmZHOU Y F, ZHANG T. Nudge theory and Its Application Research Review and Future Outlook - New Ideas for Behavioral Decision Change[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, 2019(10): 94-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLC201910010.htm [13] 万晓珍, 程小燕, 汪迎春, 等. 个性化健康教育对老年慢性病患者健康行为及用药知信行的影响研究[J]. 中国健康教育, 2021, 37(12): 1135-1138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK202112017.htmWAN X Z, CHENG X Y, WANG Y C, et al. A study on the impact of personalized health education on the health behavior and medication knowledge, belief, and behavior of elderly patients with chronic diseases[J]. China Health Education, 2021, 37(12): 1135-1138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJK202112017.htm [14] 周越, 单岩, 杜理平, 等. Cox健康行为互动模式在慢性病患者护理中的应用现状[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(4): 108-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202004033.htmZHOU Y, CHAN Y, DU L P, et al. Application status of Cox health behavior interaction model in nursing care of patients with chronic diseases[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 35(4): 108-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202004033.htm [15] PEIMANI M, MONJAZEBI F, GHODSSI-GHASSEMABADI R, et al. A peer support intervention in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2018, 101(3): 460-466. [16] 李晓明, 戴婷, 彭运石. 红色及图形表征对健康行为的助推作用[J]. 心理科学, 2020, 43(6): 1425-1431. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX202006021.htmLI X M, DAI T, PENG Y S. The Boosting Effect of Red and Graphical Representation on Healthy Behavior[J]. Psychological Science, 2020, 43(6): 1425-1431. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX202006021.htm [17] 郭梦茜, 张宁. 助推手卫生的行为干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 863-876. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD202204010.htmGUO M Q, ZHANG N. Behavioral intervention strategies for promoting hand hygiene[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 863-876. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD202204010.htm [18] 李佳洁, 于彤彤. 基于助推的健康饮食行为干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2052-2063. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD202012008.htmLI J J, YU T T. Intervention Strategies for Healthy Dietary Behavior Based on Boosting[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(12): 2052-2063. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD202012008.htm -

计量
- 文章访问数: 361
- HTML全文浏览量: 250
- PDF下载量: 18
- 被引次数: 0