Clinical features, treatment and prognosis of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia
-
摘要:
目的 研究阴道上皮内瘤变(VAIN)的一般临床特征及治疗方法和预后情况。 方法 回顾性收集2019年1月—2022年2月就诊于蚌埠医学院第一附属医院的168例经组织学确诊的VAIN患者的临床资料,比较不同筛查方法对诊断VAIN的敏感度,以及经过治疗后病变的消退情况。 结果 患者年龄为(49.52±11.63)岁,其中45岁及以上115例(68.5%),57.1%的患者已绝经,细胞学、HPV、阴道镜及细胞学联合HPV的筛查敏感度分别为61.5%、92.4%、84.6%及95.0%,HPV筛查的总体敏感度显著高于细胞学检查(P=0.001)。子宫切除术后患者的细胞学检查敏感度与未行子宫切除患者的细胞学筛查敏感度差异无统计学意义(P=0.718)。阴道镜检查的病理符合率较细胞学检查高(P=0.001)。VAIN病变级别与合并宫颈病变的级别间存在正相关趋势(r=0.162,P=0.036)。HPV16是VAIN感染率最高的基因型。随访到的97例患者经过治疗后,病变降级和病变消退者共83例(85.6%),其中2例患者病变消退后再次复发,经再次治疗后均好转,共有5例患者(5.2%)病变进展,其中1例VAIN 3患者进展为阴道癌,VAIN患者的预后可能与年龄相关。 结论 细胞学、HPV及阴道镜检查仍可作为VAIN的诊断程序, 经过积极治疗随访,大部分患者病变消退,预后良好。 Abstract:Objective To study the general clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN). Methods The clinical data of 168 patients with histologically confirmed VAIN admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 2019 to February 2022 were retrospectively collected. The sensitivity of different screening methods to the diagnosis of VAIN and the regression of lesions after treatment were compared. Results The average age of the patients was (49.52±11.63) years old, of which 115 cases (68.5%) were 45 years old and above, and 57.1% of the patients were postmenopausal. The screening sensitivity of cytology, HPV, colposcopy, and cytology combined with HPV were 61.5%, 92.4%, 84.6% and 95.0%, respectively. The overall sensitivity of HPV screening was significantly higher than that of cytology (P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of cytological screening between patients after hysterectomy and those without hysterectomy (P=0.718). The pathological coincidence rate of colposcopy was higher than that of cytology (P=0.001). There was a positive correlation between the grade of VAIN and the grade of cervical lesions (r=0.162, P=0.036). HPV16 was the most common genotype of VAIN. Among the 97 patients who were followed up after treatment, 83 patients (85.6%) had lesion degradation and regression, of which 2 patients relapsed again after regression and improved after re-treatment. Five patients (5.2%) had lesion progression, of which 1 patient with VAIN3 progressed to vaginal cancer. The prognosis of VAIN patients may be related to age. Conclusion Cytology, HPV and colposcopy can still be used as a diagnostic procedure for VAIN. After active treatment and follow-up, most patients have a good prognosis. -
Key words:
- Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia /
- Human papillomavirus /
- Colposcopy /
- Treatment /
- Prognosis
-
表 1 VAIN患者的一般临床特征[例(%)]
Table 1. General clinical characteristics of VAIN patients [case (%)]
临床资料 VAIN 1级 VAIN 2~3级 χ2值 P值 细胞学结果(n=143) 0.523 0.469 NILM 34(41.0) 21(35.0) ≤LSIL 44(53.0) 27(45.0) ≥ASC-H 5(6.0) 12(20.0) HPV结果(n=158) 0.693 0.405 阳性 85(90.4) 61(95.3) 阴性 9(9.6) 3(4.7) 阴道镜诊断(n=136) 10.700 0.001 阴性 19(24.1) 2(3.5) 低度病变 54(68.4) 27(47.4) 高度病变 6(7.6) 28(49.1) 合并宫颈病变(n=167) 1.177 0.278 有 70(72.2) 45(64.3) 无 27(27.8) 25(35.7) 子宫切除史(n=166) 1.951 0.162 有 15(15.6) 17(24.3) 无 81(84.4) 53(75.7) 表 2 宫颈病变与阴道上皮内瘤变的关系[例(%)]
Table 2. Relationship between cervical lesions and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia [case (%)]
病变类型 例数 无合并 宫颈LSIL 宫颈HSIL 宫颈癌 VAIN 1级 97 27(27.8) 33(34.0) 32(33.0) 5(5.2) VAIN 2~3级 70 25(35.8) 5(7.1) 32(45.7) 8(11.4) 表 3 VAIN患者的治疗结局[例(%)]
Table 3. Treatment outcome of VAIN patients [case (%)]
病变等级 例数 病变消退 病变降级 病变稳定 病变进展 VAIN1 54 44(81.5) 0 7(12.9) 3(5.6) VAIN 2~3 43 30(69.8) 9(20.9) 2(4.7) 2(4.7) 合计 97 74(76.3) 9(9.3) 9(9.3) 5(5.2) -
[1] HOSHI-SAKAMOTO E, KISEKI H, IKEDA S I. Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia 3 in a woman without simultaneous cervical intraepithelial neoplasm[J]. J Med Cases, 2020, 11(8): 246-248. doi: 10.14740/jmc3532 [2] 米兰, 毕蕙. 阴道镜在阴道上皮内瘤变诊治中的作用[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2021, 37(12): 894-897. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2021.12.syfckzz202112006MI L, BI H. The role of colposcopy in the diagnosis and treatment of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 37(12): 894-897. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2021.12.syfckzz202112006 [3] 宋芳, 王建东, 张师前, 等. 阴道上皮内瘤变诊治专家共识(2020)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2020, 36(8): 722-728. doi: 10.19538/j.fk2020080113SONG F, WANG J D, ZHANG S Q, et al. Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2020, 36(8): 722-728. doi: 10.19538/j.fk2020080113 [4] 陈丽梅, 张宏伟, 汪清, 等. 阴道内镜在隐匿性阴道顶角高级别鳞状上皮内病变诊治中的应用[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(8): 569-575. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210614-00324CHEN L M, ZHANG H W, WANG Q, et al. Application of vaginoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of occult vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 56(8): 569-575. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210614-00324 [5] AO M Y, ZHENG D X, WANG J W, et al. Risk factors analysis of persistence, progression and recurrence in vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 162(3): 584-589. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.027 [6] CAO D, WU D, XU Y. Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia in patients after total hysterectomy[J]. Curr Probl Cancer, 2021, 45(3): 100687. DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100687. [7] 张璐, 汪清, 张宏伟, 等. 4562例阴道上皮内瘤变和阴道癌的临床特征分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2021, 30(9): 646-650. doi: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.09.033ZHANG L, WANG Q, ZHANG H W, et al. Clinical features of vaginal precancer and cancer: a retrospective study of 4562 cases in China[J]. Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 30(9): 646-650. doi: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.09.033 [8] TIDY J. The risk of vaginal cancer is associated with a history of cervical neoplasia[J]. BJOG, 2020, 127(4): 455. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16065 [9] 范雅丽, 王建东. 宫颈病变与阴道上皮内瘤变相关性及高危因素分析[J]. 医学综述, 2018, 24(10): 1888-1891, 1897. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2018.10.004FAN Y L, WANG J D. Correlation between cervical pathological changes and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia and analysis of risk factors[J]. Medical Recapitulate, 2018, 24(10): 1888-1891, 1897. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2018.10.004 [10] YU D, QU P P, LIU M H. Clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes associated with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective study of 118 patients[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2021, 47(5): 1624-1630. doi: 10.1111/jog.14733 [11] 唐丹, 敖孟银, 郄明蓉. 阴道上皮内瘤变的诊治进展[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2021, 37(12): 881-884. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFCZ202112001.htmTANG D, AO M Y, XI M R. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021, 37(12): 881-884. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFCZ202112001.htm [12] 宋昱, 隋龙, 汪清, 等. 1467例阴道上皮内瘤变的液基细胞学及HPV检测的回顾性分析[J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2018, 45(4): 530-535. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYK201804016.htmSONG Y, SUI L, WANG Q, et al. Retrospective analysis of liquid based cytology and HPV test on 1467 cases of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences, 2018, 45(4): 530-535. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHYK201804016.htm [13] STUEBS F A, SCHULMEYER C E, MEHLHORN G, et al. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 299(2): 525-532. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4953-8 [14] STUEBS F A, KOCH M C, MEHLHORN G, et al. Accuracy of colposcopic findings in detecting vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective study[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2020, 301(3): 769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05441-5 [15] 王立群, 何玉, 李旭, 等. R-way阴道镜诊断系统在宫颈疾病诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(10): 1704-1707, 1772. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002684WANG L Q, HE Y, LI X, et al. Clinical application value of R-way colposcopy diagnosis system in diagnosing cervical diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(10): 1704-1707, 1772. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002684 [16] 毕蕙, 李明珠, 赵超, 等. 子宫颈低级别鳞状上皮内病变管理的中国专家共识[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2022, 23(4): 443-445. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FKLC202204036.htmBI H, LI M Z, ZHAO C, et al. Chinese expert consensus on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022, 23(4): 443-445. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FKLC202204036.htm [17] ZHANG Y C, SU Y H, TANG Y J, et al. Comparative study of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (5-ALA-PDT) and surgery for the treatment of high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2022, 39: 102958. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102958. [18] BOGANI G, DITTO A, FERLA S, et al. Treatment modalities for recurrent high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 30(2): e20. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e20. [19] KIM M K, LEE I H, LEE K H. Clinical outcomes and risk of recurrence among patients with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: a comprehensive analysis of 576 cases[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2018, 29(1): e6. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e6. -