留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

HIST1H3D对早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的预测价值

王梦格 李曼 苌雨环 吕丽丽 叶国柳

王梦格, 李曼, 苌雨环, 吕丽丽, 叶国柳. HIST1H3D对早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的预测价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(6): 940-944. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003020
引用本文: 王梦格, 李曼, 苌雨环, 吕丽丽, 叶国柳. HIST1H3D对早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的预测价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(6): 940-944. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003020
WANG Mengge, LI Man, CHANG Yuhuan, LYU Lili, YE Guoliu. Predictive value of HIST1H3D in lymph node metastasis of early cervical cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(6): 940-944. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003020
Citation: WANG Mengge, LI Man, CHANG Yuhuan, LYU Lili, YE Guoliu. Predictive value of HIST1H3D in lymph node metastasis of early cervical cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(6): 940-944. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003020

HIST1H3D对早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的预测价值

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003020
基金项目: 

安徽省教育厅2021高校拔尖人才培育资助项目 gxyq2021190

蚌埠市科技创新指导类项目 20210338

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    叶国柳,E-mail:Yeguoliu3981@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R737.33  R730.7

Predictive value of HIST1H3D in lymph node metastasis of early cervical cancer

  • 摘要:   目的  分析探讨早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的高危因素,研究HIST1H3D对早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的预测价值。  方法  从蚌埠医学院第一附属医院选取2021年1—12月在妇产科行根治性子宫切除术的早期宫颈鳞癌患者组织40例,以及2016年1月—2020年12月的早期宫颈鳞癌患者蜡块标本124例。通过RT-qPCR、Western blotting和免疫组化分析HIST1H3D在淋巴结转移组与非转移组的表达差异;通过χ2检验及生存分析曲线分析HIST1H3D对早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移组与非转移组临床特征和生存的影响;使用二元logistic回归分析淋巴结转移的影响因素。  结果  FIGO分期(χ2=30.491,P<0.001),肿瘤大小(χ2=8.362,P<0.004),淋巴血管间隙浸润(χ2=29.350,P<0.001)和HIST1H3D表达(χ2=4.148,P<0.042)等与淋巴结转移显著相关。HIST1H3D基因过表达是早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的高危因素,淋巴结阳性组患者生存率更差(P=0.014)。HIST1H3D的高低表达组生存率存在显著差异,HIST1H3D低表达组生存期更长(P=0.019)。ROC曲线结果表明当HIST1H3D免疫组化评分为5时,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.704,灵敏度为89.29%,特异度为64.71%,此时对淋巴结转移预测效果最佳(P<0.001)。  结论  HIST1H3D对早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移有预测价值。

     

  • 图  1  HIST1H3D在早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移组与非转移组的表达

    注:A为RT-qPCR结果;B为Western blotting典型条带。

    Figure  1.  HIST1H3D expression in early cervical cancer lymph node metastasis group and nonmetastatic group

    图  2  免疫组化验证HIST1H3D在早期宫颈癌组织淋巴结转移组与非转移组的表达

    注:A、B为淋巴结转移组;C、D为淋巴结非转移组。A、C放大倍数为100×;B、D放大倍数为200×,均采用免疫组化染色Maxvision法。

    Figure  2.  Immunohistochemistry confirmed HIST1H3D expression in the lymph node metastasis group and nonmetastatic group in early cervical cancer tissue

    图  3  早期宫颈癌生存分析曲线

    注:A为淋巴结转移组与非转移组;B为HIST1H3D高表达与低表达组。

    Figure  3.  Early cervical cancer survival analysis curve

    图  4  HIST1H3D表达的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)

    Figure  4.  The ROC curve of HIST1H3D expression subjects

    表  1  淋巴结转移与早期宫颈癌临床特征的关系

    Table  1.   Relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinical features of early cervical cancer

    临床病理特征 类别 例数 淋巴结转移 阳性率(%) χ2 P 临床病理特征 类别 例数 淋巴结转移 阳性率(%) χ2 P
    年龄 ≤51岁 61 30 31 49.18 0.783 0.376 阴道受累 67 41 26 61.19 15.128 <0.001
    >51岁 63 26 37 41.27 57 15 42 26.32
    HPV感染 110 49 61 44.55 0.149 0.699 淋巴血管间隙浸润 31 27 4 87.10 29.350 <0.001
    14 7 7 50.00 93 29 64 31.18
    肿瘤大小 ≤4 cm 77 27 50 35.06 8.362 0.004 术后辅助治疗 107 43 64 40.19 7.798 0.005
    >4 cm 47 29 18 61.70 17 13 4 76.47
    间质浸润深度 ≤1/2 28 8 20 28.57 4.019 0.045 HIST1H3D表达 101 50 51 49.50 4.148 0.042
    >1/2 96 48 48 50.00 无或低 23 6 17 26.09
    FIGO分期 ⅠA 1 0 1 0 30.491 <0.001 随访时生命状态 死亡 21 14 7 66.67 4.721 0.030
    ⅠB 50 8 42 16.00 存活 103 42 61 40.78
    ⅡA 73 48 25 65.75
    分化等级 G1~G2 89 42 47 47.19 0.525 0.469
    G3 35 14 21 40.00
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  早期宫颈癌淋巴结转移的二元logistic回归分析

    Table  2.   Binary logistic regression analysis of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer

    变量 β SE Waldχ2 P OR 95% CI 变量 β SE Waldχ2 P OR 95% CI
    年龄 -1.384 0.665 4.334 0.037 0.251 0.068~0.922 FIGO分期 2.194 0.844 6.754 0.009 8.970 1.715~46.916
    HPV -0.190 0.803 0.056 0.813 0.827 0.171~3.989 阴道受累 -0.464 0.829 0.313 0.576 0.629 0.124~3.191
    MRI 1.667 0.640 6.784 0.009 5.298 1.511~18.576 间质浸润深度 -1.084 0.783 1.916 0.166 0.338 0.073~1.570
    肿瘤大小 -0.375 0.687 0.258 0.612 0.738 0.162~2.922 淋巴血管间隙浸润 2.395 0.972 6.066 0.014 10.967 1.631~73.753
    分化等级 -0.332 0.679 0.239 0.625 0.717 0.189~2.715 HIST1H3D表达 1.987 0.736 7.296 0.007 7.296 1.725~30.858
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] BENÍTEZ-ARVIZU G, CASTRO-JÁCOME T P, TOVAR-PÉREZ E, et al. Antiproliferative, apoptotic, and antimigratory activities of kafirins on cervical cancer-derived cell lines[J]. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc, 2022, 61: 4-11.
    [2] 胡红, 李循律, 黄德旭, 等. EGFR和自噬相关蛋白Atg5、p62在宫颈癌中的表达及意义研究[J]. 河北医药, 2020, 42(18): 2760-2765. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYZ202018008.htm

    HU H, LI X L, HUANG D X, et al. Expression and clinical significance of EGFR and autophagy-related proteins Atg5 and p62 in cervical cancer[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2020, 42(18): 2760-2765. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYZ202018008.htm
    [3] TSUYOSHI H, TSUJIKAWA T, YAMADA S, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for revised 2018 FIGO staging in patients with cervical cancer[J]. Diagnostics, 2021, 11: 202. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020202
    [4] 古丽巴努·穆海麦提, 阿比丹·吐尔汗, 先君, 等. 外周血Treg细胞、T淋巴细胞及其亚群与早期宫颈癌的关系及对淋巴结转移的预测价值研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22(12): 2308-2312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX202212020.htm

    GULIBANU·Muhaimaiti, ABIDAN·Tuerhan, XIAN Jun, et al. The Relationship between peripheral blood treg cells, T lymphocytes and their subsets and early cervical cancer and the predictive value of lymph node metastasis[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2022, 22(12): 2308-2312. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX202212020.htm
    [5] 赵小迎, 郑胡忠, 金纬纬, 等. 宫颈癌临床病理特征与盆腔淋巴结转移的相关性分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(3): 430-432. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000700

    ZHAO X Y, ZHENG H Z, JIN W W, et al. Correlation between clinicopathological features and pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(3): 430-432. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000700
    [6] AREZZO F, CORMIO G, MONGELLI M, et al. Machine learning applied to MRI evaluation for the detection of lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06824-6.
    [7] YILDIRIM N, SAATLI B, KOSE S, et al. Predictability of myometrial, lower uterine segment and cervical invasion with 3D transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer patients: a prospective cohort study[J]. Med Ultrason, 2018, 20: 348-54. doi: 10.11152/mu-1493
    [8] BALCACER P, SHERGILL A, LITKOUHI B. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2019, 44: 2557-2571. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01984-7
    [9] STOJILJKOVIC M, SOBIC S D, ODALOVIC S, et al. FDG PET-CT as an important diagnostic tool and prognostic marker in suspected recurrent cervical carcinoma after radiotherapy: comparison with MRI[J]. Radiol Oncol, 2022, 56(4): 453-460. doi: 10.2478/raon-2022-0042
    [10] XIA X M, LI D D, DU W, et al. Radiomics based on nomogram predict pelvic lymphnode metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2022, 12(10): 2446. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102446
    [11] WANG X, LI S J, LIN X H, et al. Evaluation of tracer kinetic parameters in cervical cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as biomarkers in terms of biological relevance, diagnostic performance and inter-center variability[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 958219. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.958219.
    [12] HOLM J, GERKE O, VILSTRUP M H, et al. Improved stratification of stage-specific survival for cervical uterine cancer by integrating FDG-PET/CT and MRI for lymph node staging in 2018 FIGO classification[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.021.
    [13] 周滑雪, 杜丹丽, 叶国柳. HIST1H3D基因在宫颈癌中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2020, 35(12): 1969-1972. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYAZ202012014.htm

    ZHOU H X, DU D L, YE G L. Expression and clinical significance of HIST1H3D in human cervical cancer[J]. The Practical Journal of Cancer, 2020, 35(12): 1969-1972. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYAZ202012014.htm
    [14] YE G L, WANG L Q, YANG K, et al. Fucoxanthin may inhibit cervical cancer cell proliferation via downregulation of HIST1H3D[J]. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48: 815-822.
    [15] CHEN J, WU Y, SUN Y, et al. Bacterial endotoxin decreased histone H3 acetylation of bovine mammary epithelial cells and the adverse effect was suppressed by sodium butyrate[J]. BMC Vet Res, 2019, 15(1): 267.
    [16] MOUBARAK R S, DE PABLOS-ARAGONESES A, ORTIZ-BARAHONA V, et al. The histone demethylase PHF8 regulates TGFβsignaling and promotes melanoma metastasis[J]. Sci Adv, 2022, 8(7): eabi7127. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7127.
    [17] WANG J N, ZHANG Q Y, LI Q, et al. Phase Ⅰ study and pilot efficacy analysis of entinostat, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, in chinese postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer[J]. Target Oncol, 2021, 16: 591-599.
    [18] SINGH A K, BISHAYEE A, PANDEY A K. Targeting histone deacetylases with natural and synthetic agents: an emerging anticancer strategy[J]. Nutrients, 2018, 10(6): 731.
  • 加载中
图(4) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  101
  • HTML全文浏览量:  27
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-08-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回