细菌性肝脓肿导致脓毒症的危险因素分析

付宽; 段美丽; 王国兴

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002937

细菌性肝脓肿导致脓毒症的危险因素分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002937

1.
首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院急诊科，北京 100050
2.
首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院重症医学科

基金项目:

北京市医管局临床医学发展专项扬帆计划 ZYLX201804

详细信息

通讯作者:
王国兴，E-mail: 13520240749@163.com

中图分类号: R657.33 R631
计量
- 文章访问数: 185
- HTML全文浏览量: 111
- PDF下载量: 21
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-01-05
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-31

Risk factors for sepsis caused by pyogenic liver abscess

1.
Department of Emergency, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China

摘要

摘要: 目的分析细菌性肝脓肿（PLA）患者的临床特征，确定PLA导致脓毒症的危险因素以及早期诊断的化验指标。方法回顾性分析2019年1月—2020年12月于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院诊断为细菌性肝脓肿住院患者（131例）的临床资料。将符合入组标准的患者分为脓毒症组（45例）与非脓毒症组（86例）。采用SPSS 26.0统计学软件分析2组患者的临床资料，通过单因素和logistic多因素分析明确PLA导致脓毒症的危险因素。运用受试者工作特征曲线（ROC曲线）分析入院时血中性粒细胞比值、肌酐、葡萄糖对细菌性肝脓肿进展为脓毒症的诊断价值。结果脓毒症组的男性及出现寒战症状的比例更高，且入院时的中性粒细胞百分比、血红蛋白、C-反应蛋白、谷丙转氨酶、总胆红素、直接胆红素、肌酐、葡萄糖水平高于非脓毒症组，而血小板、钠、二氧化碳水平低于非脓毒症组（均P < 0.05）。Logistic回归分析得出入院时较高的中性粒细胞百分比、肌酐、葡萄糖为细菌性肝脓肿引起脓毒症的危险因素（均P < 0.05）。ROC曲线分析示入院时血中性粒细胞比值、肌酐对于PLA进展为脓毒症的诊断价值较好。AUC值分别为0.815（95% CI: 0.743~0.886）、0.760（95% CI: 0.667~0.854）。当中性粒细胞比值≥85.8%，肌酐≥79.75 μmol/L时，需警惕PLA进展为脓毒症。结论中性粒细胞比值对于PLA导致脓毒症有较好的预测作用。对于PLA患者，中性粒细胞比值≥85.8%时需警惕病情进展为脓毒症。
- 细菌性肝脓肿 /
- 脓毒症 /
- 危险因素 /
- 中性粒细胞百分比
Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA), to review the risk factors for sepsis caused by pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) and the laboratory indicators that can predict the occurrence of sepsis at an early stage. Methods The clinical data of 131 patients with PLA in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were divided into a sepsis group (45 cases) and a non-sepsis group (86 cases). SPSS 26.0 statistical software was used to analyze the clinical data of patients in the two groups, and the risk factors of sepsis caused by PLA were determined by univariate and logistic multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to analyze the diagnostic value of neutrophil ratio, serum creatinine and glucose on admission for the sepsis caused by PLA. Results The sepsis group had a higher percentage of males and symptoms of chills, and higher neutrophil percentage, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatinine and glucose levels on admission than the non-sepsis groups, while platelets, sodium and carbon dioxide levels were lower than the non-sepsis group (all P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the higher percentage of neutrophil, creatinine and glucose at admission were the risk factors for sepsis caused by bacterial liver abscess (all P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that serum neutrophil ratio and creatinine at admission had better diagnostic value for PLA progressing to sepsis, and the AUC values were 0.815 (95% CI: 0.743-0.886) and 0.760 (95% CI: 0.667-0.854), respectively. When the neutrophil ratio is ≥85.8% and creatinine ≥79.75 μmol/L, one needs to be alert for the progression of PLA to sepsis. Conclusion The neutrophil ratio is a good predictor of PLA-induced sepsis. In PLA patients, if the neutrophil ratio is ≥85.8% on admission, it is necessary to prevent the progression of sepsis.
- Pyogenic liver abscess /
- Sepsis /
- Risk factors /
- Percentage of neutrophils

HTML全文

图 1 血GR%、Cr、Glu预测脓毒症发生的ROC曲线

Figure 1. The ROC curve of serum GR%, Cr and Glu in predicting sepsis

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 2组细菌性肝脓肿患者一般资料及各项指标比较

Table 1. Comparation of the general information and each index between two groups of patients with bacterial liver abscess

组别	例数	性别(男/女，例)	年龄[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，岁]	高血压[例(%)]	糖尿病[例(%)]	冠心病[例(%)]	胆结石[例(%)]	脑梗死[例(%)]	发热[例(%)]	寒战[例(%)]	腹痛[例(%)]	恶心[例(%)]
脓毒症	45	32/13	60.00(40.50，65.50)	16(35.6)	23(51.1)	1(2.2)	11(24.4)	7(15.6)	44(97.8)	42(93.3)	22(48.9)	21(46.7)
非脓毒症	86	45/41	61.00(51.00, 68.25)	38(44.2)	37(43.0)	7(8.1)	22(25.6)	6(7.0)	84(97.7)	65(75.6)	44(51.2)	30(34.9)
统计量		4.303^a	0.904^b	0.908^a	0.778^a	0.920^a	0.020^a	1.567^a	<0.001^a	5.092^a	0.061^a	1.725^a
P值		0.038	0.366	0.341	0.378	0.338	0.887	0.211	1.000	0.024	0.805	0.189

组别	例数	腹泻[例(%)]	WBC[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，×10⁹/L]		GR% [M(P₂₅, P₇₅)]	HGB(x±s，g/L)		PLT[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，×10⁹/L]	CRP(x±s，mg/L)		血钠(x±s，mmol/L)	ALB(x±s，g/L)
脓毒症	45	7(15.6)	13.13(8.11, 15.68)		89.30(86.80, 93.90)	131.09±18.44		168.00(103.50, 255.00)	204.95±82.59		131.79±4.43	33.96±6.52
非脓毒症	86	7(8.1)	10.47(8.21, 13.39)		81.30(75.38, 87.35)	124.14±19.63		270.00(169.75, 375.50)	144.21±75.88		135.42±4.14	35.37±4.56
统计量		1.702^a	1.549^b		5.901^b	2.164^c		4.067^b	4.220^c		4.655^c	1.294^c
P值		0.192	0.121		<0.001	0.032		<0.001	<0.001		<0.001	0.200

组别	例数	ALT[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，U/L]	TB[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，μmol/L]		DB[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，μmol/L]	Cr[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，μmol/L]		CO₂(x±s，mmol/L)	Glu[M(P₂₅, P₇₅)，mmol/L]		脓肿是否单发[例(%)]	直径>5 cm[例(%)]
脓毒症	45	57.00(33.00, 133.50)	24.74(19.34, 56.43)		15.99(9.18, 27.68)	90.50(67.65, 140.55)		21.25±4.48	13.17(7.51, 20.71)		27(60.0)	25(55.6)
非脓毒症	86	44.50(29.00, 71.75)	16.31(10.81, 25.94)		7.16(4.87, 13.04)	66.85(54.65, 77.50)		23.65±3.20	8.08(6.08, 12.39)		61(70.9)	49(57.0)
统计量		2.118^b	4.457^b		4.963^b	4.886^b		3.321^c	3.574^b		1.801^a	0.024^a
P值		0.034	<0.001		<0.001	<0.001		0.001	<0.001		0.206	0.876
注：^a为χ²值，^b为Z值，^c为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 影响脓毒症的logistic回归分析

Table 2. Logistic regression analysis of influence on sepsis

变量	B	SE	Wald χ²	P值	OR(95%CI)
GR%	0.127	0.044	8.398	0.004	1.136(1.042~1.238)
Cr	0.031	0.010	10.108	0.001	1.032(1.012~1.052)
Glu	0.107	0.041	6.735	0.009	1.113(1.027~1.207)

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	王贝贝, 冯婷婷, 赵卫峰, 等. 社区获得性细菌性肝脓肿患者的临床和病原学特征[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2021, 39(6): 351-357. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20200712-00712 WANG B B, FENG T T, ZHAO W F, et al. Clinical and pathogenic characteristics of community acquired pyogenic liver abscess[J]. Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2021, 39(6): 351-357. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20200712-00712
[2]	潘教治, 王仙敏, 黄友全, 等. 糖尿病合并细菌性肝脓肿424例临床分析[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志, 2021, 14(3): 199-202. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2021.03.007 PAN J Z, XIE D M, WANG X D, et al. Clinical analysis of 424 cases of diabetes mellitus complicated with bacterial liver abscess[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2021, 14(3): 199-202. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2021.03.007
[3]	YOO J J, LEE T K, KYOUNG D S, et al. A population-based study of pyogenic liver abscess in Korea: incidence, mortality and temporal trends during 2007-2017[J]. Liver Int, 2021, 41(11): 2747-2758. doi: 10.1111/liv.15034
[4]	LEE C H, JO H G, CHO E Y, et al. Maximal diameter of liver abscess independently predicts prolonged hospitalization and poor prognosis in patients with pyogenic liver abscess[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1): 171. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05873-7
[5]	YIN D L, JI C Y, ZHANG S J, et al. Clinical characteristics and management of 1 572 patients with pyogenic liver abscess: a 12-year retrospective study[J]. Liver Int, 2021, 41(4): 810-818. doi: 10.1111/liv.14760
[6]	RUDD K E, JOHNSON S C, AGESA K M, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10219): 200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7
[7]	蔡敏杰, 金莹莹, 林荣海, 等. 脓毒症基因多态性的研究新进展[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(3): 471-475. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001838 CAI M J, JIN Y Y, LIN R H, et al. Recent developments of gene polymorphisms of sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(3): 471-475. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001838
[8]	LI S X, YU S F, PENG M F, et al. Clinical features and development of sepsis in Klebsiella pneumoniae infected liver abscess patients: a retrospective analysis of 135 cases[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1): 597. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06325-y
[9]	PARK K S, LEE S H, YUN S J, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a feasible prognostic marker for pyogenic liver abscess in the emergency department[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019, 45(2): 343-351. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0925-8
[10]	孙炳伟. 脓毒症时中性粒细胞的生物学行为[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2019, 32(1): 31-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLYB201901008.htm SUN B W. Biological behavior of neutrophils in sepsis[J]. Journal of Medical Postgraduates, 2019, 32(1): 31-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLYB201901008.htm
[11]	KUMAR S, PAYAL N, JYOTI A, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps and organ dysfunction in sepsis[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2021, 523: 152-162. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.09.012
[12]	阴晴, 刘大东, 邢虎, 等. 应用logistic回归模型和ROC曲线评价外周血感染性指标在脓毒症中的诊断价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(12): 2955-2957. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2019.12.042 YIN Q, LIU D D, XING H, et al. Logistic regression model and ROC curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of peripheral blood infectivity indexes in sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2019, 39(12): 2955-2957. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2019.12.042
[13]	杜俊丽. 血清Neu%、PCT水平与脓毒症患者APACHEⅡ评分的关联性及其临床意义[J]. 临床医学, 2021, 41(7): 45-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-EBED202107016.htm DJ J L. Correlation between serum Neu%, PCT and APACHE Ⅱ score in patients with sepsis and its clinical significance[J]. Clinical Medicine, 2021, 41(7): 45-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-EBED202107016.htm
[14]	齐文旗, 黄椿媚, 边帆, 等. 肝脓肿致脓毒血症的危险因素及早期诊断[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019, 28(11): 1383-1384, 1389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.11.010 QI W Q, HUANG C M, BIAN F, et al. Risk factors and early diagnosis of sepsis caused by liver abscess[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2019, 28(11): 1383-1384, 1389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.11.010
[15]	杨祎, 章仲恒, 洪玉才, 等. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值对脓毒性休克预后的预测价值[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2022, 20(2): 170-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYL202202021.htm YANG Y, ZHANG Z H, HONG Y C, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in septic shock[J]. Clinical Education of General Practice, 2022, 20(2): 170-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYL202202021.htm
[16]	ATTAR B M, CABRERA N L, ARAUJO T, et al. Risk factors, management, and outcomes of pyogenic liver abscess in a US Safety Net Hospital[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2020, 65(5): 1529-1538. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05851-9
[17]	ZHOU Y Y, LU G Z, BAI Y P, et al. Retrospective study of characteristics and management of pyogenic liver abscess during 5 years' experience[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2021, 14(2): 252-260. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33564358
[18]	赵岩, 李守龙, 王国兴. 超声介入联合抗生素治疗肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿临床分析[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2021, 23(10) : 1457-1460. ZHAO Y, LI S L, WANG G X. Clinical analysis of ultrasound intervention combined with antibiotics in treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess[J]. Journal of Chinese Physician, 2021, 23(10) : 1457-1460.
[19]	张健, 沈振华, 吴小昌. 不同血糖控制水平的化脓性肝脓肿患者临床特点和预后分析[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2022, 24(3): 361-363. ZHANG J, SHEN Z H, WU X C. Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of pyogenic liver abscess with different levels of serum glucose[J]. Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal, 2022, 24(3): 361-363
[20]	高玉雷, 刘艳存, 王力军, 等. 天津某三甲医院四年急诊脓毒症特点回顾分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2022, 31(1): 85-91. GAO Y L, LIU Y C, CHAI Y F, et al. Characteristics of sepsis in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Tianjin: A 4-year retrospective analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022, 31(1): 85-91.
[21]	ALKOMOS M F, ESTIFAN E, MELKI G, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, microbiological, and risk factors of pyogenic liver abscess: an 18-years retrospective single-center analysis[J]. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect, 2021, 11(1): 42-45. http://doc.paperpass.com/foreign/rgArti20214256384.html
[22]	赵豹, 邬路平, 徐乐珍, 等. 化脓性肝脓肿并发脓毒症的影响因素及其检查评估[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2021, 31(20): 3069-3072. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYY202120007.htm ZHAO B, WU L P, YE C L, et al. Influencing factors for sepsis in patients with suppurative liver abscess and assessment of test indexes[J]. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2021, 31(20): 3069-3072. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYY202120007.htm
[23]	WARDI G, TAINTER C R, MEIER A, et al. Age-related incidence and outcomes of sepsis in California, 2008—2015[J]. J Crit Care, 2021, 62: 212-217. http://www.nstl.gov.cn/paper_detail.html?id=6d9d0b9dc090e39ed24adfafe2e8d1dd