靶向破黄法在单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的临床疗效

韩康; 谭树森; 张政; 张红侠; 米娜; 宋若先

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002930

靶向破黄法在单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的临床疗效

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002930

中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院骨科，山东济南 250000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 81702935

详细信息

通讯作者:
宋若先，E-mail：gan_7758525@163.com

中图分类号: R681.53 R616.5
计量
- 文章访问数: 163
- HTML全文浏览量: 55
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-09-11
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-31

Clinical analysis of targeted broken ligamentum flavum method of unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

Deprtment of Orthopedic, the 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Jinan, Shandong 250000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨在单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症中使用靶向破黄法的临床疗效及其安全性。方法回顾性分析2020年1月-2022年1月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院收治的86例腰椎间盘突出患者。按手术方式分成2组, 靶向破黄法组(TBM组)39例, 常规掀盖法组(CCM组)47例。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS), 功能障碍指数评分(ODI)及日本骨科协会评估(JOA)评分对疼痛、功能指标及相关并发症进行整理和统计。结果 TBM组手术时间、术中出血、切口长度分别为(58.6±14.5) min、(42.6±10.6) mL及(2.93±0.23) cm, 而CCM组分别为(81.4±17.6) min、(63.8±18.6) mL及(3.12±0.43) cm, 2组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.001)。而2组住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.293)。2组术前疼痛及功能指标(VAS、ODI、JOA)差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);术后2组组间比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05), 组内不同时点间差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。2组患者在术后的各项评分较术前有显著改善(均P < 0.05)。所有患者均未出现严重并发症且短期并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论靶向破黄法在单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的治疗中是一种理想的治疗方式, 在临床中可进一步地进行推广。
- 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术 /
- 腰椎间盘突出症 /
- 脊柱内镜
Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of targeted broken ligamentum flavum method of unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods A total of 86 patients with lumbar disc herniation admitted to the 960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively analysed.Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the surgery they had undergone: the targeted broken ligamentum flavum method group (TBM group, 39 cases) and the conventional clamshell method group (CCM group, 47 cases).Using visual analogue scale (VAS), oswestry disability index (ODI) and Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) scores to assess the pain and functional parameters to record surgical complications. Results The mean operating time and bleeding volume were (58.6±14.5) min and (42.6±10.6) mL and the length of the incision was (2.93±0.23) cm in the TBM group, and (81.4±17.6) min and (63.8±18.6) mL and (3.12±0.43) cm in the CCM group, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (all P < 0.001).In contrast, there was no significant difference in the hospital stay time between the 2 groups (P=0.293).No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in preoperative indices (VAS, ODI, JOA), all P>0.05;no statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups postoperatively (all P>0.05).There were significant differences between the 2 groups at different time points after surgery (all P < 0.05).Patients in both groups showed a significant improvement in their postoperative scores compared to their preoperative scores (all P < 0.05).There were no serious complications and there were no significant differences in the short-term between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The targeted broken ligamentum flavum method of unilateral biportal endoscopy could be a kind of ideal treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis, which could be further promoted in the clinical practice.
- Unilateral biportal endoscopy /
- Lumbar disc herniation /
- Spinal endoscopye

HTML全文

图 1 UBE治疗L₅/S₁腰椎间盘突出症典型病例

注：患者男性，31岁，L₅/S₁椎间盘突出。A~D为术前影像学资料。E为术前定位。F为术中透视定位。G~H为术中神经根及纤维环缝合后图像。I为摘除的突出髓核。G为手术结束后完整外观，显示大部分黄韧带及骨质给予保留。K~L为术前及术后骨质3D影像。

Figure 1. Typical cases of L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation treated with UBE

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 2组腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛指标比较(x±s，分)

Table 1. Comparison of pain index between two groups of patients with lumbar disc herniation (x±s, points)

组别	例数	术前	术后3 d	术后1个月	术后3个月	F值	P值
TBM组	39	8.05±0.95	2.28±0.51^a	1.49±0.51^ab	1.13±0.41^abc	1 249.527	< 0.001
CCM组	47	8.13±1.08	2.25±0.44^a	1.47±0.62^ab	1.13±0.45^abc	0.069	0.977
t值		0.346	0.261	0.154	0.006
P值		0.730	0.795	0.878	0.995
注：与术前比较，^aP < 0.05；与术后3 d比较，^bP < 0.05；与术后1个月比较，^cP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组腰椎间盘突出症患者ODI指标比较(x±s)

Table 2. Comparison of ODI index between two groups of patients with lumbar disc herniation(x±s)

组别	例数	术前	术后3 d	术后1个月	术后3个月	F值	P值
TBM组	39	42.18±11.33	18.92±5.72^a	10.92±2.13^ab	8.21±2.22^abc	220.890	< 0.001
CCM组	47	43.77±12.80	17.60±4.47^a	10.36±2.13^ab	8.32±2.40^abc	0.851	0.470
t值		0.603	1.205	1.216	-0.227
P值		0.548	0.231	0.227	0.821
注：与术前比较，^aP < 0.05；与术后3 d比较，^bP < 0.05；与术后1个月比较，^cP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组腰椎间盘突出症患者JOA指标比较(x±s)

Table 3. Comparison of JOA index in two groups of patients with lumbar disc herniation(x±s)

组别	例数	术前	术后3 d	术后1个月	术后3个月	F值	P值
TBM组	39	8.87±1.73	15.85±2.85^a	16.92±3.49^ab	21.15±4.55^abc	267.414	< 0.001
CCM组	47	8.66±1.39	14.85±3.13^a	17.44±3.89^ab	22.00±4.52^abc	1.367	0.259
t值		0.630	1.528	-0.651	-0.862
P值		0.530	0.130	0.517	0.391
注：与术前比较，^aP < 0.05；与术后3 d比较，^bP < 0.05；与术后1个月比较，^cP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组腰椎间盘突出症患者各手术指标的比较(x±s)

Table 4. Comparison of surgical index between two groups of patients with lumbar disc herniation(x±s)

组别	例数	手术时间 (min)	出血量 (mL)	切口长度 (mm)	住院时间 (d)	引流量 (mL)
TBM组	39	59.2±14.2	42.2±8.4	2.93±0.23	6.62±2.11	20.95±8.81
CCM组	47	78.8±19.3	68.0±17.2	3.12±0.43	7.11±2.17	40.51±9.68
t值		5.271	8.558	2.444	1.058	9.711
P值		< 0.001	< 0.001	0.017	0.293	< 0.001

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	GUPTA A, CHHABRA H S, NAGARJUNA D, et al. Comparison of functional outcomes between lumbar interbody fusion surgery and discectomy in massive lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective analysis[J]. Global Spine J, 2021, 11(5): 690-696. doi: 10.1177/2192568220921829
[2]	PRANATA R, LIM M, VANIA R, et al. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery versus microscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 138: e450-e458. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.151.
[3]	LIU C, ZHOU Y. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for massive lumbar disc herniation[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2019, 176: 19-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.10.017.
[4]	GADJRADJ P S, HARHANGI B S, AMELINK J, et al. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2021, 46(8): 538-549. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003843
[5]	AN J W, LEE C W. Surgical treatment of extraforaminal gas-containing pseudocyst compressing L5 nerve root by using unilateral biportal endoscopy[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.186.
[6]	TANG S, MOK T N, HE Q, et al. Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of full-endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompression laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10(10): 10130-10146. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-198
[7]	KANG M S, CHUNG H J, JUNG H J, et al. How I do it? Extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with biportal endoscopic technique[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2021, 163(1): 295-299. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04435-1
[8]	KIM J E, CHOI D J, Park E J J, et al. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Asian Spine J, 2019, 13(2): 334-342. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0210
[9]	HUANG Y, YIN J, SUN Z, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for LDH via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach: a meta-analysis[J]. Orthopade, 2020, 49(4): 338-349. doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03710-z
[10]	LEE H G, KANG M S, KIM S Y, et al. Dural injury in unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery[J]. Global Spine J, 2021, 11(6): 845-851. doi: 10.1177/2192568220941446
[11]	MENG S W, PENG C, ZHOU C L, et al. Massively prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation with interlaminar endoscopic spine system delta endoscope: a case series[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2021, 9(1): 61-70. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.61
[12]	NAKAMURA K, ARIZONO T, INOKUCHI A, et al. Massive lumbar disc herniation causing cauda equina syndrome that presents as bladder and bowel dysfunction in the absence of lower extremity weakness[J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(9): e17952. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17952.
[13]	王立飞, 孙永进, 杨祖华. 可视化椎间孔成形系统辅助下的椎间孔镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效[J]. 安徽医学, 2018, 39(9): 1122-1124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHYX201809028.htm WANG L F, SUN Y J, YANG Z H. Visualization of intervertebral foramen forming system aided by intervertebral foramen mirror the curative effect of surgical treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2018, 39(9): 1122-1124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHYX201809028.htm
[14]	金学廷, 查晓亮, 邱振红, 等. 不同麻醉方法下经椎间孔镜髓核摘除术患者的舒适度与安全性研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(9): 1484-1487. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002092 JIN X T, CHA X L, QIU Z H, et al. Comfort and safety of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with different anaesthesia methods[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1484-1487. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002092
[15]	裴少保, 江渟, 祁家龙, 等. 偏心导杆在经皮椎间孔镜手术穿刺中的应用效果分析[J]. 安徽医学, 2019, 40(11): 1240-1242. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHYX201911016.htm PEI S B, JIANG T, QI J L, et al. Effect analysis of eccentric guide bar in the application of percutaneous puncture intervertebral foramen surger[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2019, 40(11): 1240-1242. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHYX201911016.htm
[16]	PAN M M, LI Q F, LI S C, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: indications and complications[J]. Pain Physician, 2020, 23(1): 49-56.
[17]	赵龙, 张荣宜, 刘畅. 椎间孔镜手术与等离子联合胶原酶手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效比较[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(11): 1827-1830. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002177 ZHAO L, ZHANG R Y, LIU C. Comparison of the clinical effects of percutaeoustransforaminal endoscopic discectomy and plasma-mediated radiofrequency ablation combined with collagenase in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practic, 2021, 19(11): 1827-1830. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002177
[18]	王牧川, 余可谊, 仉建国, 等. 双通道脊柱内镜技术的应用及进展[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(11): 892-896. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AMYD202211019.htm WABG M C, YU K Y, ZHANG J G, et al. Progression and clinical application in unilateral biportal endoscopic[J]. Chinese Journal of Surgery, 2020, 58(11): 892-896. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AMYD202211019.htm
[19]	KIM J, HEO D H, LEE D C, et al. Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2021, 163(9): 2537-2543. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34213652/
[20]	KIM N, JUNG S B. Percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery using a 30-degree arthroscope in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2019, 32(8): 324-329. http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31464695/