希望和积极应对在甲状腺癌症患者宽恕与主观幸福感间的多重中介作用

谢长华; 戴玉; 周利华; 王新燕

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002834

希望和积极应对在甲状腺癌症患者宽恕与主观幸福感间的多重中介作用

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002834

1.
安徽医科大学附属宿州医院普外三科，安徽宿州 234000
2.
安徽医科大学护理学院，安徽合肥 230032
3.
安徽医科大学附属宿州医院护理部

基金项目:

安徽省高校自然科学研究项目 KJ2017A828

宿州市科技计划自筹项目宿科技[2020]65号

详细信息

通讯作者:
周利华，E-mail：531879548@qq.com

中图分类号: R736.1 R395.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 147
- HTML全文浏览量: 22
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-11

Relationship between forgiveness and general well-being in patients with thyroid cancer: multiple mediating effects of hope and positive coping

1.
Third Department of General Surgery of Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Suzhou, Anhui 234000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨甲状腺癌症患者希望、积极应对、宽恕和主观幸福感之间的关系并检验希望和积极应对在宽恕和主观幸福感间的多重中介效应，为制定提升甲状腺癌症患者主观幸福感水平的干预方案提供科学依据。方法选取2019年5月—2021年3月安徽医科大学附属宿州医院普外三科治疗的甲状腺癌症患者177例，采用Heartland宽恕量表(HFS)、总体幸福感量表(GWB)、Herth希望量表(HHI)和简易应对方式问卷(SCSS)进行调查，运用结构方程模型和Bootstrap程序进行中介效应检验。结果 (1) 甲状腺癌患者宽恕、希望、积极应对和主观幸福感的得分分别为(103.97±20.45)分、(34.76±3.78)分、(15.38±5.78)分、(57.50±10.10)分。(2)宽恕与希望、积极应对、主观幸福感呈正相关关系(r=0.229、0.513、0.480，均P＜0.01)；希望与积极应对、主观幸福感呈正相关关系(r=0.278、0.390，均P＜0.01)，积极应对与主观幸福感呈正相关关系(r=0.508，P＜0.01)。(3)多重中介检验结果显示宽恕对主观幸福感的直接效应显著；希望、积极应对在宽恕和主观幸福感之间起到并行多重中介效应(95% CI：0.132~0.409)，总效应为0.62，直接效应为0.35，总中介效应为0.27，中介效应占总效应的43.5%。结论宽恕可直接影响主观幸福感，也可通过希望和积极应对间接影响主观幸福感，本研究结果可为甲状腺癌症患者心理健康干预方案的制定提供理论依据。
- 甲状腺癌症 /
- 宽恕 /
- 主观幸福感 /
- 希望 /
- 积极应对 /
- 多重中介
Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship among hope, positive coping, forgiveness and subjective well-being of thyroid cancer patients, and to test the multiple mediating effect of hope and positive coping between forgiveness and general well-being, so as to provide scientific basis for formulating intervention programs to improve the level of general well-being of thyroid cancer patients. Methods A total of 177 patients with thyroid cancer in the Third Department of Gneral Surgery of Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from May 2019 to March 2021 were selected. They were surveyed by simple coping style scale (SCSS), general well-being scale (GWB), Herth hope index (HHI), and Heartland forgiveness scale (HFS). The structural equation model was established, and the mediation effect test was performed by Bootstrapping method. Results (1) The scores of forgiveness, hope, positive coping and general well-being of patients with thyroid cancer were (103.97±20.45), (34.76±3.78), (15.38±5.78) and (57.50±10.10) points respectively. (2) Forgiveness was positively correlated with hope, positive coping and general well-being (r=0.229, 0.513, 0.480, all P < 0.01); hope was positively correlated with positive coping and general well-being (r=0.278, 0.390, all P < 0.01); positive coping was positively correlated with general well-being (r=0.508, P < 0.01). (3) Multiple mediation effect model analysis showed that the level of forgiveness had a significant direct effect on the general well-being of patients with thyroid cancer. Hope and positive coping style had concurrent multiple mediating effect between forgiveness and general well-being (95% CI: 0.132-0.409). The total effect was 0.62; the direct effect was 0.35, and the total mediation effect was 0.27. The mediating effect accounts for 43.5% of the total effect. Conclusion Forgiveness can directly affect the general well-being. It can also influence the general well-being through hope and positive coping style indirectly. Results of this study can provide a theoretical basis for the formulation of mental health intervention programs for patients with thyroid cancer.
- Thyroid cancer /
- Forgiveness /
- General well-being /
- Hope /
- Positive coping style /
- Multiple mediating effects
利益冲突 无

HTML全文

图 1 希望和积极应对的中介路径分析图

注：图中数据为标准化路径系数，e1~e14为残差。

Figure 1. Analysis of intermediary paths for hope and positive response

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 一般人口学和疾病特征对甲状腺癌患者各变量得分影响的单因素分析(x±s，分)

Table 1. Univariate analysis of the influence of general data and disease characteristics on the scores of various variables in patients with thyroid cancer(x±s, scores)

项目	类别	人数(%)	宽恕	积极应对	希望	主观幸福感
性别	男性	120(67.80)	105.40±19.79	15.79±6.03	35.21±3.48	59.23±9.73
	女性	57(32.20)	100.92±21.62	14.52±5.13	33.80±4.20	53.86±9.96
t值			1.365	1.364	2.348	3.407
P值			0.174	0.174	0.020	0.001
年龄(岁)	21~45	12(6.78)	99.16±24.66	14.08±6.58	34.00±2.48	54.91±6.66
	46~70	134(75.71)	103.02±19.98	15.08±5.78	34.66±3.99	56.58±10.51
	≥71	31(17.51)	109.90±20.22	17.19±5.23	35.48±3.12	62.45±7.72
F值			1.796	2.030	0.853	4.872
P值			0.167	0.134	0.428	0.009
受教育程度	小学及以下	87(49.15)	100.17±20.14	15.32±5.76	34.45±4.03	55.48±10.30
	初中	51(28.81)	104.09±20.61	14.49±5.85	34.98±4.11	57.86±10.15
	高中/专科	33(18.64)	111.06±19.30	16.09±5.14	35.36±2.51	62.09±8.49
	本科及以上	6(3.40)	118.83±15.98	20.00±7.40	34.00±2.89	58.50±7.66
F值			3.526	1.878	0.598	2.708
P值			0.016	0.135	0.617	0.032
家庭人均月收入(元)	＜2 000	108(61.02)	99.98±19.69	14.31±5.73	34.61±4.16	55.42±10.10
	2 000~5 000	39(22.03)	105.38±21.97	16.84±5.46	34.84±3.31	60.51±10.64
	＞5 000	30(16.95)	116.46±15.79	17.33±5.57	35.20±2.82	61.10±7.21
F值			8.403	5.023	0.295	3.163
P值			＜0.001	0.008	0.745	0.015
婚姻情况	已婚	155(87.57)	103.94±20.51	15.52±5.86	34.57±3.72	57.61±10.26
	丧偶	17(9.60)	104.94±21.21	15.47±5.28	36.35±4.30	58.17±8.79
	未婚和离异	5(2.83)	101.20±19.58	10.80±2.48	35.20±2.77	51.80±8.75
F值			0.064	1.631	1.746	0.843
P值			0.938	0.199	0.178	0.432
主要照顾者	配偶	84(47.46)	106.38±21.00	16.17±6.13	34.79±3.42	58.46±9.62
	子女	70(39.55)	102.85±20.04	15.25±5.69	34.97±4.27	56.18±10.79
	其他	23(12.99)	98.52±19.05	12.86±3.81	34.00±3.43	58.00±9.54
F值			1.513	3.058	0.576	1.005
P值			0.223	0.050	0.563	0.368
家庭所在地	城市	36(20.34)	108.22±18.99	16.13±6.09	34.75±3.34	57.33±10.64
	城镇	39(22.03)	104.69±19.46	15.71±5.13	35.17±3.50	57.43±8.15
	农村	102(57.63)	102.18±21.23	14.99±5.91	34.60±4.03	57.58±10.64
F值			1.194	0.606	0.320	0.009
P值			0.306	0.546	0.726	0.991
病程(年)	＜1	128(72.32)	103.48±19.56	15.53±5.85	35.21±3.70	58.80±10.22
	1~3	36(20.33)	106.50±22.31	15.08±5.93	33.66±3.79	56.83±9.87
	＞3	13(7.35)	101.69±24.52	14.69±4.83	33.30±3.79	56.38±9.98
F值			0.390	0.186	3.506	0.214
P值			0.678	0.830	0.032	0.807

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 各量表相关性分析结果(r值)

Table 2. Descriptive analysis results and correlation matrix of each variable (r value)

项目	宽恕	希望	积极应对
宽恕	1
希望	0.229	1
积极应对	0.513	0.278	1
主观幸福感	0.480	0.390	0.508
注：均P＜0.01。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	ZHANG K, LI C L, LIU J Q, et al. Down-regulation of APTR and it' s diagnostic value in papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancer[J]. Pathol Oncol Res, 2020, 26(1): 559-565. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0561-y
[2]	杭秦雯, 孙志岭, 张立, 等. 基于微信平台视频宣教对甲状腺癌患者扩大根治术后肩颈功能锻炼的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(17): 73-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202017020.htm HANG Q W, SUN Z L, ZHANG L, et al Effect of video education based on wechat platform on shoulder and neck functional exercise of patients with thyroid cancer after extended radical operation[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(17): 73-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL202017020.htm
[3]	朱宝燕, 李智林. 快速康复护理在甲状腺癌围术期护理中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(17): 3164-3167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202017036.htm ZHU B Y, LI Z L. Application of fast-track nursing in perioperative period of thyroid cancer[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2020, 34(17): 3164-3167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202017036.htm
[4]	刘昕怡, 曹丽双, 陆钰原, 等. 分化型甲状腺癌术后生活质量调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中日友好医院学报, 2021, 35(1): 41-42, 45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRYH202101011.htm LIU X Y, CAO L S, LU Y Y, et al Investigation on postoperative quality of life of differentiated thyroid cancer and analysis of influencing factors[J]. Journal of China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2021, 35(1): 41-42, 45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRYH202101011.htm
[5]	薛霞, 徐旭娟, 顾志峰, 等. 中文版甲状腺疾病患者生活质量问卷简明版的信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2017, 20(17): 2111-2117, 2122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYX201717017.htm XUE X, XU X J, GU Z F, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Short Version of Thyroid - specific Patient Reported Outcome[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2017, 20(17): 2111-2117, 2122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYX201717017.htm
[6]	王心怡, 王乾宇, 张月娟, 等. 情绪智力、情绪劳动策略与主观幸福感的关系[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(2): 380-382, 379. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201802036.htm WANG X N, WANG Q Y, ZHANG Y J, et al. Emotional Intelligence and Subjective Well-being: the Intermediary Role of Surface Acting[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2018, 26(2): 380-382, 379. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201802036.htm
[7]	李忠臣, 王康, 刘晓敏, 等. 青少年人际宽恕与心理健康: 愤怒和主观幸福感的多重中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(5): 987-991. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201805032.htm LI Z C, WANG K, LIU X M, et al. Interpersonal Forgiveness and Psychological Health in Adolescents: A Multiple Mediating Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2018, 26(5): 987-991. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY201805032.htm
[8]	LUCAS A G, CHANG E C, MORRIS L E, et al. Relationship between hope and quality of life in primary care patients: vitality as a mechanism[J]. Soc Work, 2019, 64(3): 233-241.
[9]	姚若松, 郭梦诗. 社会支持对大学生社会幸福感的影响: 希望的中介作用[J]. 心理学探新, 2018, 38(2): 164-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT201802012.htm YAO R S, GUO M S. The Mediating Effects of Hope on the Relationship between Social Support and Social Happiness in College Students[J]. Psychological Exploration, 2018, 38(2): 164-170. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT201802012.htm
[10]	葛刘娜, 章新琼, 吴小婷, 等. 应对方式在食管癌患者心理一致感与主观幸福感间的中介作用[J]. 现代预防医学, 2019, 46(10): 1825-1828, 1861. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201910024.htm GE L N, ZHANG X Q, WU X T, et al. Coping style as a mediator between sense of coherence and subjective well-being in patients with esophageal cancer[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2019, 46(10): 1825-1828, 1861. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYF201910024.htm
[11]	温兴盛, 何培宇, 李玉林. 大学生情绪智力与主观幸福感的关系: 应对方式的中介作用: 基于甘肃省三所普通高校的调查[J]. 成都师范学院学报, 2020, 36(8): 25-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJXB202008004.htm WEN X S, HE P Y. LI Y L. The Mediating Role of Coping Style in Association between Emotional Intelligence and College Students' Subjective Well-being: On the Basis of a Survey of Three Universities in Gansy Province[J]. Journal of Chengdu Normal University, 2020, 36(8): 25-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJXB202008004.htm
[12]	王金霞. 大学生宽恕心理及其影响因素的实证研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2006. WANG J X. The Empirical Study on Forgiveness Mind and Its Influencing Factors of the College Students[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2006.
[13]	段建华. 总体幸福感量表在我国大学生中的试用结果与分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 1996, 4(1): 56-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY601.015.htm DUAN J H. The trial results and analysis of the overall well-being scale among Chinese college students[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1996, 4(1): 56-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY601.015.htm
[14]	赵海平, 王健. 血液透析患者的社会支持和希望[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2000, 35(5): 49-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL200005034.htm ZHAO H P, WANG J. Social support and hope of hemodialysis patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2000, 35(5): 49-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL200005034.htm
[15]	解亚宁. 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 1998, 6(2): 114-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY802.017.htm XIE Y N. A preliminary study on the reliability and validity of the simple coping style scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1998, 6(2): 114-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLCY802.017.htm
[16]	黄明榕, 张万群, 董超群. 艾滋病患者社交回避苦恼、情绪社交孤立与焦虑抑郁的关系[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(14): 69-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201914024.htm HUANG M R. ZHANG W Q. DONG C Q. Relationships among social avoidance and distress. emotional and social loneliness. anxiety and depression in AIDS patients[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2019, 34(14): 69-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201914024.htm
[17]	INNES S I. The relationship between levels of resilience and coping styles in chiropractic students and perceived levels of stress and well-being[J]. J Chipropr Educ, 2017, 31(1): 1-7.
[18]	张华, 罗梅, 董银凤, 等. 妇科癌症患者癌症复发恐惧与生活质量的关系及夫妻支持的中介效应[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(12): 2119-2122, 2130. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001142 ZHANG H, LUO M, DONG Y F, et al. Relationship between the Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Quality of Life among Patients with Gynecology Cancer: Mediating Effect of Spouse Support[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(12): 2119-2122, 2130. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001142
[19]	周炎根, 卢家楣, 张萍, 等. 大学生情境评价对状态性宽恕发生的实验研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2017, 31(9): 723-727. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201709013.htm ZHOU Y G. LU J M. ZHANG P. et al. Experimental study on effects of cognitive evaluation on generation of situationa forgiveness in college students[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2017, 31(9): 723-727. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201709013.htm
[20]	赵媛. 高中生归因方式、宽恕与主观幸福感的关系研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2020. ZHAO Y. A study on the relationship among attribution. forgiveness and subjective well-being of senior high school students[D]. Harbin: Harbin Normal University, 2020.