老年全髋关节置换术患者实施加速康复外科麻醉管理措施的临床研究

张嘉; 杨保仲; 管晓东

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002812

老年全髋关节置换术患者实施加速康复外科麻醉管理措施的临床研究

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002812

张嘉^{1, 2},
杨保仲^1, ,,
管晓东³

1.
山西医科大学麻醉学院, 山西太原 030600
2.
运城市中心医院麻醉科, 山西运城 044000
3.
运城市中心医院泌尿外科

基金项目:

山西省2020年“四个一批”科技兴医创新计划项目 2020TD22

详细信息

通讯作者:
杨保仲, E-mail: 362000311@qq.com

中图分类号: R687.4 R614.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 142
- HTML全文浏览量: 29
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-07-22
- 网络出版日期: 2023-04-07

Implementation of ERAS anaesthesia management measures in elderly patients undergoing total hip replacement

1.
College of Anesthesiology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030600, China

摘要

摘要: 目的观察在老年全髋关节置换术围手术期实施加速康复外科(ERAS)麻醉管理相关措施的临床效果。方法选择2019年10月—2021年10月于运城市中心医院择期行全髋关节置换术的120例老年患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组(60例)和研究组(60例)。对照组在全身麻醉下行全髋关节置换术，研究组实施ERAS麻醉管理措施。记录手术及麻醉后恢复指标，比较术后VAS评分及血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)和皮质醇(Cor)等炎症及应激因子水平变化，统计术后48 h内补救镇痛次数及镇痛药物不良反应，观察住院期间并发症情况。结果研究组术中出血量[(1 022.86±26.74)mL]显著少于对照组[(1 350.41±28.29)mL, t=65.177，P＜0.001]，术后自主呼吸恢复时间、麻醉苏醒时间、拔管时间、术后首次排气时间、术后下床时间和住院时间均少于对照组(均P＜0.05)。研究组术后12、24、36 h和48 h的VAS评分均低于对照组(均P＜0.05)。术后24 h和48 h，研究组患者血清TNF-α、IL-6、NE和Cor均低于对照组(均P＜0.05)。研究组补救镇痛、镇痛药物不良反应和术后并发症发生率均低于对照组(均P＜0.05)。结论 ERAS麻醉管理模式可有效降低老年全髋关节置换术手术创伤，抑制应激及炎症反应，缓解疼痛反应，缩短康复周期，降低药物不良反应及并发症风险。
- 加速康复外科 /
- 全髋关节置换术 /
- 麻醉管理 /
- 术后康复 /
- 临床效果
Abstract: Objective This study aimed to observe the clinical effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) anaesthesia management in the perioperative period of total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patients. Methods A total of 120 elderly patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty in Yuncheng Central Hospital from October 2019 to October 2021 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into the control group (60 cases) and study group (60 cases). The control group performed total hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia, and the study group performed ERAS anaesthesia management measures. The control group received total hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia, and the study group received ERAS anaesthesia management measures. The recovery indexes after operation and anaesthesia was recorded. The changes in VAS score and contents of serum inflammatory and stress factors such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), inflammatory factors interleukin-6 (IL-6), norepinephrine (NE) and cortisol (Cor) were compared within 48 h after operation. The number of remedial analgesia and adverse reactions of analgesic drugs within 48 h after operation were counted, and the complications during hospitalisation were observed. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume in the study group [(1 022.86±26.74) mL] was less than that in control group [(1 350.41±28.29) mL, t=65.177, P < 0.001]. The recovery time of postoperative spontaneous breathing, anaesthesia awakening time, extubation time, postoperative first exhaust time, postoperative ambulation time and hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group (all P < 0.05). The VAS scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after operation (all P < 0.05). At 24 and 48 h after operation, the content of serum TNF-α, IL-6, NE and Cor in the study group was lower than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). The rate of remedial analgesia, adverse reaction of analgesic drugs and postoperative complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion ERAS anaesthesia management mode can effectively reduce the surgical trauma of total hip replacement in the elderly, inhibit stress and inflammatory reaction, alleviate postoperative pain reaction, shorten the rehabilitation cycle and reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions and complications.
- Enhanced recovery after surgery /
- Total hip arthroplasty /
- Anaesthesia management /
- Postoperative rehabilitation /
- Clinical effect

HTML全文

表 1 2组全髋关节置换术患者手术及麻醉恢复指标比较(x ±s)

Table 1. Comparison of surgical and anesthetic recovery indexes between the two groups(x ±s)

组别	例数	术中出血量(mL)	自主呼吸恢复时间(min)	麻醉苏醒时间(min)	拔管时间(min)	术后首次排气时间(d)	术后首次下床时间(d)	住院时间(d)
研究组	60	1 022.86±26.74	8.59±0.79	12.28±0.93	16.54±1.22	1.98±0.36	3.82±0.59	5.41±0.63
对照组	60	1 350.41±28.29	10.48±0.97	14.17±1.15	18.73±1.40	2.74±0.41	6.37±0.76	7.61±0.81
t值		65.177	11.703	9.899	9.135	10.493	20.529	16.607
P值		＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组全髋关节置换术患者术后VAS评分比较(x ±s，分)

Table 2. Comparison of VAS scores in two groups at different time after operation(x + s, points)

组别	例数	术后12 h	术后24 h	术后36 h	术后48 h
研究组	60	3.42±0.59	2.74±0.54^a	1.89±0.47^ab	1.38±0.45^abc
对照组	60	4.61±0.67	3.82±0.62^a	2.56±0.53^ab	1.79±0.49^abc
t值		9.517	8.639	8.284	6.147
P值		＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001
注：与同组术后12 h比较，^aP＜0.05；与同组术后24 h比较，^bP＜0.05；与同组术后36 h比较，^cP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组全髋关节置换术患者术后血清炎症及应激因子水平比较(x ±s)

Table 3. Comparison of serum inflammatory and stress factor levels between two groups after operation(x ±s)

组别	例数	TNF-α(pg/mL)		IL-6(pg/mL)		NE(mg/mL)		Cor(mg/mL)
组别	例数	术后24 h	术后48 h	术后24 h	术后48 h	术后24 h	术后48 h	术后24 h	术后48 h
对照组	60	75.39±4.78	47.62±3.71	263.04±9.63	159.37±8.56	173.21±8.95	95.72±5.39	54.09±4.28	36.42±2.86
研究组	60	62.72±4.45	38.59±3.46	184.62±7.56	127.36±6.85	124.37±6.15	69.81±4.73	40.78±3.74	24.95±1.74
t值		15.028	13.788	49.615	23.029	34.838	27.987	18.139	26.539
P值		＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	谢长春, 钟启钊, 陈旭, 等. 不同麻醉方式对老年髋关节置换术患者认知功能及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中国医药科学, 2021, 11(1): 189-191, 195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYKX202101065.htm XIE C C, ZHONG Q Z, CHEN X, et al. Impacts of different anesthesia methods on cognitive function and inflammatory factors in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery[J]. China Medicine and Pharmacy, 2021, 11(1): 189-191, 195. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYKX202101065.htm
[2]	SIMPAON J C, BAO X D, AGARWALA A. Pain management in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2019, 32(2): 121-128. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676477
[3]	WAINWRIGHT T W, GILL M, MCDONALD D A, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS^®) Society recommendations[J]. Acta Orthop, 2020, 91(3): 3-19.
[4]	TAN N L T, HUNT J L, GWINI S M. Does implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program for hip replacement improve quality of recovery in an Australian private hospital: a quality improvement study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2018, 18(1): 64. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0525-5
[5]	谢添, 芮云峰, 刘松桥, 等. 加速康复外科理念下老年髋部骨折术后重症监护病房快速通道建设的临床疗效初探[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(37): 2897-2902. XIE T, RUI Y F, LIU S Q, et al. Preliminary application of postoperative fast track transfer to intensive care unit for the geriatric hip fractures under enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. National Medicine Magazine of China, 2020, 100(37): 2897-2902.
[6]	赵赢, 俞灵, 雷月. 加速康复外科理念下不同麻醉方式对下肢骨折围术期镇痛和早期康复的影响[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2020, 28(17): 11-13. ZHAO Y, YU L, LEI Y. Effects of different anesthesia methods on perioperative analgesia and early rehabilitation in patients with lower limb fracture operation under the theory of enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine, 2020, 28(17): 11-13.
[7]	OUYANG R, REN H J, LIU W, et al. Remifentanil inhibits the traumatic stress response in emergent trauma surgery[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2019, 33(8): e22971. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22971.
[8]	WAGEMANS M F, SCHOLTEN W K, HOLLMANN M W, et al. Epidural anesthesia is no longer the standard of care in abdominal surgery with ERAS. What are the alternatives?[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2020, 86(10): 1079-1088.
[9]	MUNRO A, SJAUS A, GEORGE R B. Anesthesia and analgesia for gynecological surgery[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2018, 31(3): 274-279. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000584
[10]	张敏, 吕建鸿, 唐玲玲, 等. 术前口服复方碳水化合物饮品对妇科腹腔镜手术后胃肠功能的影响[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2019, 39(7): 805-808. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYX202223021.htm ZHANG M, LV J H, TANG L L, et al. Effect of preoperative oral complex carbohydrate drinks on postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology, 2019, 39(7): 805-808. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XTYX202223021.htm
[11]	苏学艳, 薛苏娟, 李晓红, 等. 添加益生菌的肠内营养对老年骨折术后患者肠道菌群变化及预后的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2017, 39(12): 1776-1779. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYZ201712004.htm SU X Y, XUE S J, LI X H, et al. The effects of enteral nutrition with probiotics and traditional enteral nutrition on intestinal flora and prognosis in elderly patients with bone fracture after surgery[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2017, 39(12): 1776-1779. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYZ201712004.htm
[12]	魏玲, 娄健. 益生菌联合谷氨酰胺强化肠内营养在老年创伤性骨折中的应用[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(4): 820-823. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXZ202004049.htm WEI L, LOU J. Application of probiotics combined with glutamine fortified enteral nutrition in elderly traumatic fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2020, 40(4): 820-823. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLXZ202004049.htm
[13]	YU J, SHAN S Q, NIE Y. Impact of local administration of various doses of dexmedetomidine on ropivacaine-induced lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve block[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2018, 16(2): 711-717.
[14]	MANCEL L, VAN LOON K, LOPEZ A M. Role of regional anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2021, 34(5): 616-625.
[15]	周晓强, 虞宵, 荆翔, 等. 静脉应用氨甲环酸联合局部灌注含氨甲环酸混合镇痛药物在单髁置换术中的应用[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2020, 35(4): 401-404. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202004026.htm ZHOU X Q, YU X, JIN X, et al. Application of intravenous tranexamic acid combined with local infusion of mixed analgesics containing tranexamic acid in condylar replacement[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury, 2020, 35(4): 401-404. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202004026.htm
[16]	刘沫轩, 张红颖, 袁建茹, 等. 静脉输注不同维持剂量氨甲环酸减少脊柱手术出血量的安全性分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2021, 36(3): 277-279. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202103019.htm LIU M X, ZHANG H Y, YUAN J R, et al. Safety analysis of intravenous infusion of different maintenance doses of tranexamic acid to reduce the amount of bleeding in spinal surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury, 2021, 36(3): 277-279. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202103019.htm
[17]	蔡昀方, 王理仁, 张润泽, 等. 盐酸羟考酮注射液用于胃癌根治术超前镇痛的临床疗效及对患者应激反应的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(11): 1821-1824, 1863. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001065 CAI Y F, WANG L R, ZHANG R Z, et al. Clinical efficacy of oxycodone hydrochloride injection for preemptive analgesia in radical gastrectomy and its effect on stress response of patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(11): 1821-1824, 1863. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001065
[18]	BHATIA A, BUVANENDRAN A. Anesthesia and postoperative pain control-multimodal anesthesia protocol[J]. J Spine Surg, 2019, 5(Suppl 2): S160-S165.
[19]	朱航彤. 混合镇痛药物关节腔内注射用于老年肩关节术后镇痛的临床观察[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2022, 27(2): 319-322. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJCW202202057.htm ZHU H T. Clinical observation of intra-articular injection of mixed analgesic drugs for postoperative analgesia of shoulder joint in elderly patients[J]. Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery, 2022, 27(2): 319-322. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJCW202202057.htm