不同胎龄超低出生体重儿肠内喂养状况比较

柯若; 陈思思; 周瑞茜; 胡莹莹

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002595

不同胎龄超低出生体重儿肠内喂养状况比较

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002595

温州医科大学附属第二医院新生儿科，浙江温州 325000

基金项目:

浙江省基础公益研究计划项目 LQ20H040002

详细信息

通讯作者:
胡莹莹，E-mail：gongcailanpo@163.com

中图分类号: R722.19 R459.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 217
- HTML全文浏览量: 103
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-11-02

Comparison of enteral feeding status of extremely low birth weight infant of different gestational ages

Department of Neonatology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨和比较不同胎龄超低出生体重儿(ELBWI)肠内喂养状况间的差异。方法选取2019年1月—2020年12月温州医科大学附属第二医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治的ELBWI共120例为研究对象, 根据胎龄将患儿分为胎龄＜28周组68例和胎龄≥28周组52例。比较2组肠内喂养状况及肠内营养不耐受(FI)情况。结果胎龄＜28周组生后前3周奶量明显少于胎龄≥28周组(t=-2.208、-13.148、-27.781，均P < 0.05)；胎龄＜28周组首次达到足量肠内喂养时间、总住院时间均明显高于胎龄≥28周组(t=8.459、22.654，P < 0.05)；而恢复出生体重后体重增长速率、出院时体重均明显低于胎龄≥28周组(t=-10.034、-12.042，均P < 0.05)。住院期间胎龄＜28周组支气管肺发育不良(BPD)发生率、坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)发生率、有创机械通气比例、2周内应用布洛芬比例、抗生素应用时间＞2周比例均明显高于胎龄≥28周组(χ²=7.169、6.114、4.544、4.834、4.488，均P < 0.05)；而FI持续时间、生后2周内FI发生率及FI复发率明显高于胎龄≥28周组(均P < 0.05)。结论不同胎龄ELBWI的肠内喂养状况差异较大，与胎龄≥28周ELBWI相比较，胎龄＜28周ELBWI的FI复发率更高，喂养耐受性差，生长发育缓慢。
- 超低出生体重儿 /
- 胎龄 /
- 肠内喂养
Abstract: Objective To investigate and compare the differences in enteral feeding status amongst extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI) of different gestational ages. Methods A total of 120 ELBWI patients admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the research subjects. According to the gestational age, the children were divided into the gestational age < 28 weeks group (n=68) and the gestational age ≥28 weeks group (n=52). Enteral feeding status and enteral nutritional intolerance (FI) were compared between the two groups. Results The amount of milk in the first 3 weeks after birth in the gestational age < 28 weeks group was significantly lower than that in the gestational age ≥28 weeks group (t=-2.208, -13.148, -27.781, all P < 0.05). The time to reach sufficient enteral feeding for the first time and the total length of hospital stay in the gestational age < 28 weeks group were significantly higher than those in the gestational age ≥28 weeks group (t=8.459, 22.654, all P < 0.05). The rate of weight gain after birth weight recovery and weight at discharge were significantly lower than those in the gestational age ≥28 weeks group (t=-10.034, -12.042, all P < 0.05). During hospitalisation, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, invasive mechanical ventilation, ibuprofen use within 2 weeks and antibiotic use >2 weeks in gestational age < 28 weeks were significantly higher than those in gestational age≥28 weeks (χ²=7.169, 6.114, 4.544, 4.834, 4.488, all P < 0.05). The duration of FI, the incidence of FI within 2 weeks after birth and the recurrence rate of FI in gestational age < 28 weeks were significantly higher than those of gestational age ≥28 weeks (all P < 0.05). Conclusion The enteral feeding status of ELBWI at different gestational ages varies greatly. Compared with ELBWI of ≥28 weeks of gestational age, ELBWI of < 28 weeks of gestational age have higher FI recurrence rate, poor feeding tolerance and slow growth and development.
- Extremely low birth weight infant /
- Gestational age /
- Enteral feeding
利益冲突 无

HTML全文

表 1 2组ELBWI一般资料比较

Table 1. General data of ELBWI were compared between the two groups

组别	例数	性别[例(%)]		分娩方式[例(%)]		出生体重 (x±s，g)	出生时身长 (x±s，cm)
组别	例数	男	女	剖宫产	顺产	出生体重 (x±s，g)	出生时身长 (x±s，cm)
胎龄＜28周组	68	37(54.41)	31(45.59)	23(33.82)	45(66.18)	802.78±12.79	43.82±2.63
胎龄≥28周组	52	27(51.92)	25(48.07)	21(36.21)	31(59.62)	865.83±15.92	44.15±2.78
统计量		0.073^a		0.546^a		-24.056^b	-0.664^b
P值		0.787		0.460		＜0.001	0.505
注：^a为χ²值，^b为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组ELBWI肠内喂养情况比较[x±s，mL/(kg·d)]

Table 2. Comparison of enteral feeding of ELBWI between the two groups [x±s, mL/(kg·d)]

组别	例数	开奶量	生后第1周奶量	生后第2周奶量	生后第3周奶量	生后第4周奶量	出院时奶量	F值	P值
胎龄＜28周组	68	13.50±1.87	26.52±3.75	58.73±5.72^a	87.36±4.71^ab	122.76±7.92^abc	157.24±11.48^abcd	3 422.032	＜0.001
胎龄≥28周组	52	12.97±1.78	27.91±3.68	72.69±5.82^a	113.75±5.69^abc	124.85±8.74^abc	159.73±13.86^abcd	1 926.672	＜0.001
t值		0.533	-2.208	-13.148	-27.781	-1.369	-1.076
P值		0.595	0.045	＜0.001	＜0.001	0.174	0.284
注：与同组生后第1周比较，^aP＜0.05；与同组生后第2周比较，^bP＜0.05；与同组生后第3周比较，^cP＜0.05；与同组生后第4周比较，^dP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组ELBWI生长指标及住院时间比较(x±s)

Table 3. ELBWI growth index and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups(x±s)

组别	例数	首次达到足量肠内喂养时间(d)	恢复出生体重后体重增长速率(%)	出院时体重(g)	住院时间(d)
胎龄＜28周组	68	32.57±2.46	14.62±1.72	2 175.84±135.63	68.82±2.42
胎龄≥28周组	52	28.62±2.63	18.47±2.48	2 483.71±142.81	57.79±2.91
t值		8.459	-10.034	-12.042	22.654
P值		＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001	＜0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组ELBWI住院期间主要疾病和治疗措施比较[例(%)]

Table 4. Comparison of main diseases and treatment measures during hospitalization between two groups of ELBWI[cases (%)]

组别	例数	BPD	NEC	有创机械通气	2周内应用布洛芬	抗生素应用＞2周
胎龄＜28周组	68	49(72.06)	17(25.00)	13(19.12)	45(66.18)	59(86.76)
胎龄≥28周组	52	25(48.08)	4(7.69)	3(5.77)	24(46.16)	37(71.15)
χ²值		7.169	6.114	4.544	4.834	4.488
P值		0.007	0.013	0.033	0.028	0.034

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 2组ELBWI的FI发生情况比较

Table 5. The incidence of FI in ELBWI was compared between the two groups

组别	例数	FI总发生[例(%)]	FI持续时间(x±s，d)	生后2周内FI发生率[例(%)]	FI复发[例(%)]
胎龄＜28周组	68	56(82.35)	51.72±1.48	53(77.94)	32(47.06)
胎龄≥28周组	52	38(73.08)	46.78±1.87	31(59.62)	15(28.85)
统计量		1.494^a	16.156^b	4.172^a	4.102^a
P值		0.222	＜0.001	0.030	0.043
注：^a为χ²值，^b为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(16)

[1]	王芯, 吴晓宁, 赵艳. 早期肠内营养联合肠外营养支持治疗新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的效果观察[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(11): 2477-2479. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201811026.htm WANG X, WU X N, ZHAO Y. Effect of early enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition in the treatment of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy[J]. Maternal and Child Health Care of China, 2018, 33(11): 2477-2479. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201811026.htm
[2]	舒国琴, 乐燕. 早期肠内微量喂养母乳联合益生菌对早产儿喂养情况及肠道菌群的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2021, 6(21): 110-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLYS202121038.htm SHU G Q, YUE Y. Effects of early enteral minimal breast feeding combined with probiotics on feeding status and intestinal flora in premature infants[J]. Clinical Research and Practice, 2021, 6(21): 110-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLYS202121038.htm
[3]	罗思堤, 陈利琴, 陈宏香. 超低出生体重儿早期微量喂养方案的临床研究[J]. 山西卫生健康职业学院学报, 2020, 30(4): 4-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXZG202004002.htm LUO S D, CHEN L Q, CHEN H X. Clinical study of early microfeeding program for ultra-low birth weight infants[J]. Journal of Shanxi Health Vocational College, 2020, 30(4): 4-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXZG202004002.htm
[4]	全美盈, 王长燕, 张玉, 等. 超低出生体重早产儿早期营养支持及生长状况十年变化分析[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志, 2017, 32(3): 180-184. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2017.03.005 QUAN M Y, WANG C Y, ZHANG Y, et al. The early nutritional support strategies and postnatal growth in extremely low birth weight infants: Trends of the last decade[J]. Chinese Journal of Neonatology, 2017, 32(3): 180-184. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2017.03.005
[5]	中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会循证专业委员会. 早产儿喂养不耐受临床诊疗指南(2020)[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2020, 22(10): 1047-1055. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2008132 Evidence-based Professional Committee, Branch of Neonatologists, Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants(2020)[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2020, 22(10): 1047-1055. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2008132
[6]	张馨月. 早产儿或低出生体重儿的早期全肠内喂养[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2021, 24(4): 277. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2021.04.102 ZHANG X Y. Early whole enteral feeding in preterm or low birth weight infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2021, 24(4): 277. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2021.04.102
[7]	陈多姿, 程亚艳, 魏敏, 等. 肠内营养开始时间对超低出生体重儿生长发育指标及消化功能的影响[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2017, 32(7): 585-588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201707003.htm CHEN D Z, CHENG Y Y, WEI M, et al. Effect of the start time of enteral nutrition on the growth index and digestive function of the extremely low birth weight infant[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2017, 32(7): 585-588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201707003.htm
[8]	黄希, 陈琼, 彭文涛. 早产儿喂养不耐受的临床特征及其危险因素[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2018, 43(7): 797-804. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYD201807019.htm HUANG X, CHEN Q, PENG W T. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for feeding intolerance in preterm infants[J]. Journal of Central South University(Medical Science), 2018, 43(7): 797-804. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNYD201807019.htm
[9]	周曼丽. 住院早产儿喂养不耐受的发生情况及预防对策分析[J]. 哈尔滨医药, 2021, 41(5): 84-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYY202105040.htm ZHOU M L. Analysis on the occurrence and prevention of feeding intolerance in hospitalized preterm infants[J]. Harbin Medical Journal, 2021, 41(5): 84-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBYY202105040.htm
[10]	BOZZETTI V, TAGLIABUE P E. Enteral feeding of intrauterine growth restriction preterm infants: Theoretical risks and practical implications[J]. Pediatr Med Chir, 2017, 39(2): 160. http://www.pediatrmedchir.org/index.php/pmc/article/view/160
[11]	李颖, 吴繁. 胎龄 < 28周和≥28周超低出生体重儿肠内喂养情况的比较[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2021, 23(7): 690-695. LI Y WU F. Enteral feeding in extremely low birth weight infants with a gestational age of < 28 weeks versus≥28 weeks[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2021, 23(7): 690-695.
[12]	董梁, 李占魁, 张莉. 极低/超低出生体重儿母乳喂养的研究现状与进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2020, 28(4): 427-430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO202004020.htm DONG L, LI Z K, ZHANG L. Research status and progress of breastfeeding for very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2020, 28(4): 427-430. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ERTO202004020.htm
[13]	UBEROS J, JIMENEZ-MONTILLA S, MOLINA-OYA M, et al. Early energy restriction in premature infants and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A cohort study[J]. Br J Nutr, 2020, 123(9): 1024-1031.
[14]	PATWARDHAN G, SONI A, RACHWANI N, et al. Factors associated with time to full feeds in preterm very low birth weight infants[J]. J Trop Pediatr, 2018, 64(6): 495-500. https://academic.oup.com/tropej/article/64/6/495/4781599
[15]	聂莉莉, 邓春贵, 何建龙, 等. 重力管饲喂养联合口腔运动对早产儿喂养不耐受的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(11): 1922-1924, 1974. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.11.030 NIE L L, DENG C G, HE J L, et al. The effect of combined treatment with gravitational tube feeding and oral motor in treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2017, 15(11): 1922-1924, 1974. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.11.030
[16]	李略. 影响NICU住院早产儿体重增长的相关因素分析[D]. 芜湖: 皖南医学院, 2018. LI L. Analysis of related factors affecting weight gain of preterm infants hospitalized in NICU[D]. Wuhu: Wannan Medical College, 2018.