不同时相远隔缺血预处理对颈动脉内膜剥脱术患者术后认知功能及脑损伤的影响

袁海军; 黄晓霞; 蓝志坚; 傅理; 彭文勇

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002588

不同时相远隔缺血预处理对颈动脉内膜剥脱术患者术后认知功能及脑损伤的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002588

金华市中心医院麻醉科，浙江金华 321000

基金项目:

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目 2020KY345

2021年度公益类金华市科学技术研究计划项目 2021-4-006

详细信息

通讯作者:
袁海军, E-mail: yuanhaijun2022@163.com

中图分类号: R743
计量
- 文章访问数: 316
- HTML全文浏览量: 144
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-04-06
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-26

Effects of different phase remote ischemic preconditioning on postoperative cognitive function and brain injury in patients with carotid endarterectomy

Department of Anesthesiology, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)采用不同时相远隔缺血预处理(RIPC)对患者术后认知功能、脑损伤的影响。方法选取2020年6月—2021年7月金华市中心医院收治的60例颈动脉重度狭窄患者，择期行颈动脉内膜剥脱术，按随机数字表法分为A组(术前1 h行RIPC方案)和B组(术前24 h行RIPC方案)，每组30例，比较2组患者神经、认知功能，血清中枢神经特异性蛋白(S100-β)、脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)、炎症因子、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)及并发症情况。结果 2组患者MMSE评分各时间点间、组间、组和时间的交互作用差异均有统计学意义(F=3.302、4.321、8.717，均P＜0.05)；术后1个月，B组患者MMSE评分[(28.54±1.44)分]明显优于A组[(27.35±1.31)分，P＜0.05]。术后24 h B组患者BDNF水平[(4.92±0.51)ng/mL]高于A组[(3.56±0.13)ng/mL，P＜0.05]。术后24 h，2组患者IL-6、hs-CRP水平较术前1 d有所提高(均P＜0.05)；2组患者SBP、DBP、MAP、HR各时间点间、组间、组别和时间的交互作用差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)。A组认知功能降低发生率为16.67%，高于B组的10.00%，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论术前24 h实施RIPC能有效缓解CEA后脑损伤情况，提升患者神经、认知功能。
- 颈动脉内膜剥脱术 /
- 远隔缺血预处理 /
- 认知功能 /
- 不同时相 /
- 神经功能 /
- 血清 /
- 并发症
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of different phases of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on cognitive function and brain injury after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods Sixty patients with severe carotid stenosis treated in Jinhua Central Hospital from June 2020 to July 2021 were randomly divided into group A (RIPC scheme 1 h before operation) and group B (RIPC scheme 24 h before operation), with 30 patients in each group. The neurological and cognitive functions and serum central nerve specific protein (S100) of the two groups were compared, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), inflammatory factors, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (map), heart rate (HR) and complications. Results Significant differences were noted in the interaction between the two groups at each time point, between groups and between groups and time (F=3.302, 4.321, 8.717, all P < 0.05). One month after operation, the MMSE score of group B [(28.54±1.44) points] was significantly better than that of group A [(27.35±1.31) points, P < 0.05]. The level of BDNF in group B [(4.92±0.51) ng/mL] was higher than that in group A [(3.56±0.13) ng/mL, P < 0.05]. At 24 h after operation, the levels of IL-6 and hsCRP in the two groups were higher than those at 1 day before operation (all P < 0.05). Significant differences were found in the interaction of SBP, DBP, map and HR between groups, groups and time between the two groups (all P < 0.05). The incidence of cognitive impairment was 16.67% in group A and 10.00% in group B. The difference between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion The implementation of RIPC 24 h before operation can effectively alleviate brain injury after CEA and improve the neurocognitive function of patients.
- Carotid endarterectomy /
- Remote ischemic preconditioning /
- Cognitive function /
- Different phases /
- Neurological function /
- Serum /
- Complication

HTML全文

表 1 2组重度颈动脉狭窄患者基线资料比较

Table 1. Comparison of baseline data between two groups of patients with severe carotid artery stenosis

组别	例数	性别(例)		年龄(x ±s，岁)	BMI(x ±s)	麻醉风险评级(例)		颈动脉内膜切除(例)		手术时间(x ±s，min)
组别	例数	男	女	年龄(x ±s，岁)	BMI(x ±s)	Ⅱ级	Ⅲ级	左侧	右侧	手术时间(x ±s，min)
A组	30	17	13	66.63±8.27	23.41±2.58	12	18	14	16	97.55±6.12
B组	30	18	12	67.23±8.04	23.55±2.45	13	17	15	15	100.02±5.45
统计量		0.069^a		0.285^b	0.216^b	0.069^a		0.067^a		1.651^b
P值		0.793		0.777	0.830	0.793		0.796		0.104
注：^a为χ²值，^b为t值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组重度颈动脉狭窄患者神经、认知功能比较(x ±s，分)

Table 2. Comparison of neurological and cognitive functions between two groups of patients with severe carotid artery stenosis (x ±s, scores)

组别	例数	术前1 d	术后7 d	术后1个月	F值	P值
A组	30	26.61±2.23	26.53±1.88	27.35±1.31	1.799	0.172
B组	30	26.77±2.12	27.32±2.19	28.54±1.44^a	6.499	0.002
t值		0.285	1.499	3.348
P值		0.777	0.139	0.001
注：与同组术前1 d、术前7 d比较，^aP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组重度颈动脉狭窄患者血清S100-β蛋白、BDNF比较(x ±s)

Table 3. Comparison of serum S100-β protein and BDNF in two groups with severe carotid artery stenosis(x ±s)

组别	例数	S100-β蛋白(μg/L)		BDNF(ng/mL)
组别	例数	术前1 d	术后24 h	术前1 d	术后24 h
A组	30	0.25±0.05	0.39±0.08^a	1.88±0.08	3.56±0.13^a
B组	30	0.24±0.04	0.36±0.09^a	1.85±0.07	4.92±0.51^a
t值		0.855	1.365	1.546	14.153
P值		0.396	0.178	0.128	＜0.001
注：与同组术前1 d比较，^aP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组重度颈动脉狭窄患者血清炎症因子比较(x ±s)

Table 4. Comparison of serum inflammatory factors between two groups of patients with severe carotid artery stenosis(x ±s)

组别	例数	IL-6(μg/L)		hs-CRP(mg/L)
组别	例数	术前1 d	术后24 h	术前1 d	术后24 h
A组	30	95.33±16.78	165.32±20.11^a	2.55±0.55	4.11±0.75^a
B组	30	94.99±16.75	160.26±20.13^a	2.61±0.62	4.05±0.77^a
t值		0.079	0.974	0.397	0.306
P值		0.938	0.334	0.693	0.761
注：与同组术前1 d比较，^aP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 2组重度颈动脉狭窄患者不同时间点SBP、DBP、MAP及HR比较(x ±s)

Table 5. Comparison of SBP, DBP, MAP and HR at different time points between two groups of patients with severe carotid artery stenosis(x ±s)

组别	例数	SBP(mm Hg)			DBP(mm Hg)
组别	例数	T1	T2	T3	T1	T2	T3
A组	30	126.24±9.50	119.77±10.86^a	134.22±13.40^a	71.35±8.12	63.79±10.38^a	75.49±11.46^a
B组	30	126.77±9.56	122.43±10.15^a	125.30±9.27	71.43±9.54	65.91±10.35^a	66.38±9.17
t值		0.215	0.980	2.998	0.035	0.785	3.400
P值		0.829	0.327	0.003	0.972	0.432	0.001

组别	例数	MAP(mm Hg)			HR(次/min)
组别	例数	T1	T2	T3	T1	T2	T3
A组	30	89.27±9.03	81.33±10.36^a	95.89±11.47^a	70.45±7.56	65.85±6.39^a	69.67±4.86
B组	30	89.60±8.11	84.97±10.75^a	85.17±11.20	70.46±5.84	68.12±5.93^a	66.85±6.51
t值		0.149	1.335	3.663	0.006	1.426	1.901
P值		0.882	0.182	＜0.001	0.995	0.154	0.057
注：与同组T1时比较，^aP＜0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	王拥军. 中国脑血管病防治面临的特殊问题[J]. 科学通报, 2016, 61(18): 2020-2026. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB201618006.htm WANG Y J. The particular issues of prevention and control of cerebrovascular disease in China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(18): 2020-2026. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB201618006.htm
[2]	迟玉玉, 宋巧凤, 吴寿岭, 等. 区域性恶性肿瘤人群心脑血管事件危险因素调查分析[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2019, 26(6): 359-365. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLZL201906002.htm CHI Y Y, SONG Q F, WU S L. Risk factors of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in regional cancer population[J]. Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, 2019, 26(6): 359-365. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QLZL201906002.htm
[3]	孙环, 杜洁, 王铭铭, 等. 心脑血管疾病流行概况及其防治分析[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2020, 19(2): 214-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWX202002018.htm SUN H, DU J, WANG M M, et al. Epidemiological situation and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health Engineering, 2020, 19(2): 214-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWX202002018.htm
[4]	禹博文, 李付勇, 邹建军, 等. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床分析[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2020, 25(2): 72-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWQX202002011.htm YU B W, LI F Y, ZOU J J, et al. Clinical analysis of carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, 2020, 25(2): 72-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWQX202002011.htm
[5]	游慧超, 李文琦, 陈迎春, 等. 初次开展颈动脉内膜剥脱术的经验总结(附31例报告)[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2020, 37(8): 735-737. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFSJ202008017.htm YOU H C, LI W Q, CHEN Y C, et al. Summary of experience in performing carotid endarterectomy surgeries (report of 31 cases)[J]. Journal of Apoplexy and Nervous Diseases, 2020, 37(8): 735-737. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFSJ202008017.htm
[6]	STETLER R A, LEAK R K, GAN Y, et al. Preconditioning provides neuroprotection in models of CNS disease: Paradigms and clinical significance[J]. Prog Neurobiol, 2014, 114: 58-83.
[7]	MASLOV L N, LISHMANOV I B, SOLENKOVA N V. Adaptation of myocardium to ischemia. The early phase of ischemic preconditioning[J]. Usp Fiziol Nauk, 2006, 37(3): 25-41.
[8]	袁昊尧, 钱凯, 符方勇, 等. 改良式颈动脉内膜剥脱术对重度颈动脉狭窄的早期疗效分析[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 12(2): 133-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XGWK202002013.htm YUAN H Y, QIAN K, FU F Y, et al. Analysis of early clinical effect of modified carotid endarterectomy on severe carotid stenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Vascular Surgery(Electronic Version), 2020, 12(2): 133-136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XGWK202002013.htm
[9]	于芸, 张晴, 韩如泉. 颈动脉狭窄复合手术术后并发症及相关因素研究[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2021, 42(4): 362-368. YU Y, ZHANG Q, HAN R Q. The complications and related factors after hybrid operation in patients with carotid artery stenosis[J]. International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, 2021, 42(4): 362-368.
[10]	向岑, 魏义勇, 王海英. 缺血预处理心肌保护作用的线粒体机制研究进展[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2020, 41(8): 813-818. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WMIA201898041.htm XIANG C, WEI Y Y, WANG H Y. Research progress on mitochondrial mechanism of myocardial protection in ischemic preconditioning[J]. International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, 2020, 41(8): 813-818. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WMIA201898041.htm
[11]	MARBER M S, YELLON D M. Myocardial adaptation, stress proteins, and the second window of protection[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1996, 793(1): 123-141.
[12]	郭鹏, 郑跃英, 余建, 等. 远端肢体缺血预处理对老年骨科患者术后认知功能障碍的影响[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2017, 19(3): 444-446. GUO P, ZHENG Y Y, YU J, et al. Effect of distal limb ischemic preconditioning on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly orthopedic patients[J]. Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal, 2017, 19(3): 444-446.
[13]	刘万超, 王晶晶, 张萌, 等. 上肢远程缺血预处理对颈动脉内膜剥脱术患者脑损伤的保护作用[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2018, 47(11): 168-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYZ201811041.htm LIU W C, WANG J J, ZHANG M, et al. Protective effects of limb remote ischemic preconditioning on brain injury in patients during carotid endarterectomy[J]. Journal of Medical Research, 2018, 47(11): 168-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYZ201811041.htm
[14]	房芳, 艾艳秋, 孟宪慧. 远隔缺血预处理对轻度认知功能障碍患者非体外循环冠脉搭桥术后认知功能的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2019, 25(18): 3027-3030. FANG F, AI Y Q, MENG X H. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery[J]. International Medicine & Health Guidance News, 2019, 25(18): 3027-3030.
[15]	薛芬, 薛姗姗, 周翠红, 等. 高压氧预处理对大鼠脑缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用及对其海马BDNF和GDNF基因表达的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2020, 20(15): 2813-2816, 2823. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX202015003.htm XUE F, XUE S S, ZHOU C H, et al. Protective effect of hyperbaric oxygen pretreatment and the expression of BDNF and GDNF genes in hippocampus of rats after cerebral ischemia reperfusion[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2020, 20(15): 2813-2816, 2823. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX202015003.htm
[16]	李丽茹, 黄杰. 病变侧亚低温对大鼠局脑缺血再灌注后认知障碍及自噬蛋白表达的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(12): 1977-1980. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000539 LI L R, HUANG J. Effect of mild hypothermia on cognitive impairment and expression of autophagy protein in rat brain after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(12): 1977-1980. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000539
[17]	吕明义, 邓淑玲, 龙晓凤. 脑源性神经营养因子预处理减轻大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2016, 31(2): 175-179. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXH201602019.htm LYU M Y, DENG S L, LONG X F. Effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor pretreatment for reducing myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in experimental rats[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2016, 31(2): 175-179. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXH201602019.htm
[18]	吴康丽, 陈秀侠, 谢晨阳, 等. 左上肢上臂缺血预处理开颅动脉瘤夹闭术患者血清NSE、S100β蛋白、脑红蛋白水平观察[J]. 山东医药, 2019, 59(9): 11-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY201909004.htm WU K L, CHEN X X, XIE C Y, et al. Changes of serum neuron-specific enolase, S100β protein and neuroglobin levels in patients with left upper-limb ischemic preconditioning in craniotomy and clipping of aneurysms[J]. Shandong Medical Journal, 2019, 59(9): 11-14. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY201909004.htm
[19]	张依爵, 陶伟平, 林微微, 等. 远端缺血预处理对动脉瘤栓塞术患者血浆S-100β、NSE及Ngb水平的影响[J]. 中国临床神经科学, 2017, 25(4): 383-390. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCSK201704005.htm ZHANG Y J, TAO W P, LIN W W, et al. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on levels of plasma S-100β, neuron specific enolase and neuroglobin in patients with cerebral aneurysm embolization[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Neurosciences, 2017, 25(4): 383-390. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCSK201704005.htm
[20]	周彪, 娄彦, 白红丽, 等. 远隔缺血预处理对老年患者肝癌手术术后早期认知功能的影响[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2018, 28(25): 92-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXDY201825021.htm ZHOU B, LOU Y, BAI H L, et al. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on postoperative cognition in elderly patients undergoing liver cancer surgery[J]. China Journal of Modern Medicine, 2018, 28(25): 92-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXDY201825021.htm
[21]	ALSERR A H, ELWAN H, ANTONOPOULOS C N, et al. Using serum s100-beta protein as a biomarker for comparing silent brain injury in carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting[J]. Int Angiol, 2019, 38(2): 136-142.
[22]	VEDIN T, SVENSSON S, EDELHAMRE M, et al. Management of mild traumatic brain injury-trauma energy level and medical history as possible predictors for intracranial hemorrhage[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019, 45(5): 901-907.
[23]	张伟萍. 短暂性脑缺血发作伴颈动脉狭窄的患者认知功能障碍相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2016, 14(1): 73-75. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2016.01.025 ZHANG W P. Risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in patients suffering from transient ischemic and carotid artery stenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2016, 14(1): 73-75. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2016.01.025