合并胫骨平台骨折的膝关节多韧带损伤情况及韧带损伤与胫骨平台骨折分型的相关性分析

颜峰; 喻灿明; 丁志清; 刘利

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002499

合并胫骨平台骨折的膝关节多韧带损伤情况及韧带损伤与胫骨平台骨折分型的相关性分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002499

台州市中医院骨科，浙江台州 318000

基金项目:

浙江省中医药科技计划项目 2022ZA183

详细信息

通讯作者:
颜峰, E-mail: yf753654@163.com

中图分类号: R683.42 R686.5
计量
- 文章访问数: 310
- HTML全文浏览量: 123
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-12-14
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-21

Multiple-ligament injury of knee joint combined with tibial plateau fracture and correlation analysis between ligament injury and classification of tibial plateau fracture

Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taizhou, Zhejiang 318000, China

摘要

摘要: 目的分析膝关节多韧带损伤合并胫骨平台骨折患者的膝关节多韧带损伤情况以及膝关节多韧带损伤和胫骨平台骨折分型的相关性, 为临床诊治提供参考依据。方法回顾性分析2020年1月-2021年1月台州市中医院诊治的62例膝关节多韧带损伤合并胫骨平台骨折患者, 分析其膝关节多韧带损伤情况, 运用Schatzker分型法、AO分型法、Duparc分型法进行胫骨平台骨折分型, 运用logistic回归分析法分析膝关节多韧带损伤和胫骨平台骨折分型的相关性。结果前交叉韧带损伤(ACL)、后交叉韧带损伤(PCL)、内侧副韧带损伤(MCL)、后外侧角损伤(PLC)、ACL+PCL、ACL+MCL、ACL+PLC、PCL+MCL、PCL+PLC、MCL+PLC的发生率分别为30.65%、8.06%、12.90%、27.42%、1.61%、3.23%、8.06%、1.61%、3.23%、3.23%。Schatzker分型中, Ⅰ~Ⅵ型分别为12、12、4、23、7、4例; AO分型中, B型、C型分别为33、29例; Duparc分型中, 外侧平台骨折、内侧平台骨折、双平台骨折、髁间嵴骨折、后内侧骨折分别为16、15、7、13、11例。Logistic分析结果显示, Schatzker、AO分型与ACL、MCL、PLC存在明显的相关性; Duparc分型与MCL、PLC存在明显的相关性。结论膝关节多韧带损伤合并胫骨平台骨折患者的膝关节多韧带损伤和胫骨平台骨折的Schatzker、AO、Duparc分型之间存在一定的相关性。
- 膝关节多韧带损伤合并胫骨平台骨折 /
- 韧带损伤 /
- 胫骨平台骨折分型 /
- 相关性
Abstract: Objective To analyse the situation of multiple-ligament injury of knee joint combined with tibial plateau fracture and the correlation between multiple-ligament injury of knee joint and the classification of tibial plateau fracture so as to provide reference basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods Sixty-two patients with knee multiple-ligament injury complicated with tibial plateau fracture diagnosed and treated in the department of orthopaedics and traumatology of Taizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2020 to January 2021 were selected as the research objects.The situation of multiple-ligament injury of knee joint was analysed.Schatzker, AO and Duparc classification methods were used to classify tibial plateau fracture.Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the correlation between multiple-ligament injury of knee joint and the classification of tibial plateau fracture. Results The incidence of Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament injury (PCL), medial collateral ligament injury (MCL), posterolateral angle injury (PLC), ACL+PCL, ACL+MCL, ACL+PLC, PCL+MCL, PCL+PLC and MCL+PLC were 30.65%, 8.06%, 12.90%, 27.42%, 1.61%, 3.23%, 8.06%, 1.61%, 3.23% and 3.23%, respectively.In Schatzker's classification, 12, 12, 4, 23, 7 and 4 cases had Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ classification, respectively.In AO classification, 33 and 29 cases had type B and type C, respectively.In Duparc classification, there were 16, 15, 7, 13 and 11 cases of lateral platform fracture, medial platform fracture, double platform fracture, intercondylar ridge fracture and posterior medial fracture, respectively.Logistic analysis showed that Schatzker and AO typing were significantly correlated with ACL, MCL and PLC.Duparc classification had obvious correlation with MCL and PLC. Conclusion There is a certain correlation between the multiple-ligament injury of knee joint and the Schatzker, AO and Duparc classification of tibial plateau fracture in patients with multiple-ligament injury of knee joint combined with tibial plateau fracture.
- Multiple-ligament injury of knee joint combined with tibial plateau fracture /
- Ligament injury /
- Classification of tibial plateau fractures /
- Relevance

HTML全文

表 1 62例膝关节多韧带损伤合并胫骨平台骨折患者胫骨平台骨折分型

Table 1. Classification of tibial plateau fracture in 62 patients with multiple ligament injury of knee joint combined with tibial plateau fracture

分型方法	类型		ACL (例)	PCL (例)	MCL (例)	PLC (例)	ACL+PCL (例)	ACL+MCL (例)	ACL+PLC (例)	PCL+MCL (例)	PCL+PLC (例)	MCL+PLC (例)	合计 [例(%)]
Schatzker分型	Ⅰ型		3	1	2	3	0	0	1	0	1	1	12(19.35)
	Ⅱ型		3	1	2	3	1	1	0	0	1	0	12(19.35)
	Ⅲ型		1	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	4(6.45)
	Ⅳ型		8	2	1	7	0	1	2	1	0	1	23(37.10)
	Ⅴ型		2	1	1	2	0	0	1	0	0	0	7(11.29)
	Ⅵ型		2	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	4(6.45)
AO分型	B型	B1型	5	1	2	3	0	1	1	0	1	0	14(22.58)
		B2型	4	0	1	4	0	0	1	0	0	0	10(16.13)
		B3型	3	1	1	2	0	0	1	0	0	1	9(14.52)
	C型	C1型	4	2	3	5	1	1	2	1	1	0	20(32.26)
		C2型	3	1	1	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	8(12.90)
		C3型	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1(1.61)
Duparc分型	外侧平台骨折		3	2	2	3	1	1	2	0	1	1	16(25.81)
	内侧平台骨折		5	1	2	4	0	1	1	0	0	1	15(24.19)
	双平台骨折		2	1	1	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	7(11.29)
	髁间嵴骨折		6	0	1	5	0	0	1	0	0	0	13(20.97)
	后内侧骨折		3	1	2	3	0	0	1	0	1	0	11(17.74)

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 膝关节多韧带损伤和胫骨平台骨折分型的相关性分析

Table 2. Correlation Analysis between multiple ligament injury of knee joint and classification of tibial plateau fracture

分型方法	ACL			PCL			MCL			PLC
分型方法	P值	OR值	95% CI	P值	OR值	95% CI	P值	OR值	95% CI	P值	OR值	95% CI
Schatzker分型	0.046	2.681	1.197~4.933	0.623	0.854	0.473~1.561	0.035	2.931	1.356~3.782	0.026	3.124	1.204~6.725
AO分型	0.032	3.004	1.571~7.373	0.582	0.795	0.247~1.146	0.020	3.742	1.436~5.234	0.011	4.668	1.582~10.563
Duparc分型	0.702	0.925	0.558~1.146	0.673	0.788	0.379~1.057	0.007	7.236	1.682~7.237	＜0.001	6.622	1.563~7.934

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	赵玉振, 范晓东, 戚徳双. 膝关节多韧带损伤的手术治疗体会[J]. 安徽医学, 2017, 38(7): 917-919. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHYX201707034.htm ZHAO Y Z, FAN X D, QI D S. Experience of surgical treatment of multiple ligament injury of knee joint[J]. Anhui Med J, 2017, 38(7): 917-919. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHYX201707034.htm
[2]	杨洋, 冯青, 李冕, 等. 膝关节韧带损伤与胫骨平台骨折形态的关系[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2019, 21(12): 936-940. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXWK201912015.htm YANG Y, FENG Q, LI M, et al. Relationship between knee ligament injury and tibial plateau fracture morphology[J]. J Traum Surg, 2019, 21(12): 936-940. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXWK201912015.htm
[3]	罗红, 曾文波, 兰生辉, 等. 依据改良Schatzker分型治疗164例复杂胫骨平台骨折[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2018, 32(9): 603-607. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNGY201809002.htm LUO H, ZENG W B, LAN S H, et al. Treatment of 164 cases of complex tibial plateau fractures according to the modified Schatzker classification[J]. South China J Defens Med, 2018, 32(9): 603-607. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNGY201809002.htm
[4]	唐晓龙, 李耀华, 刘玉章, 等. 塞来昔布对胫骨平台骨折合并交叉韧带损伤患者术后早期膝关节功能恢复的影响[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2018, 46(9): 1079-1081. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLYS201809025.htm TANG X L, LI Y H, LIU Y Z, et al. Effect of celecoxib on early postoperative knee function recovery in patients with tibial plateau fracture combined with cruciate ligament injury [J]. Chin J Clinic, 2018, 46(9): 1079-1081. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLYS201809025.htm
[5]	常恒瑞. 胫骨平台骨折合并半月板与交叉韧带损伤的临床特征分析[D]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2017. CHANG H R. Analysis of clinical characteristics of tibial plateau fracture combined with meniscus and cruciate ligament injury[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Med Univers, 2017.
[6]	林文韬, 王武炼, 肖莉莉, 等. 膝关节韧带损伤与胫骨平台骨折Schatzker及AO分型的相关性分析[J]. 中国烧伤创疡杂志, 2020, 32(2): 111-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSCS202002009.htm LIN W T, WANG W L, XIAO L L, et al. Correlation analysis between knee ligament injury and Schatzker and AO classification of tibial plateau fracture[J]. Chin J Burns, Wounds & Ulc, 2020, 32(2): 111-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSCS202002009.htm
[7]	李煜, 刘玉民, 张宁, 等. 胫骨平台骨折Schatzker分型与膝关节功能相关性分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2016, 45(12): 1629-1631. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQYX201612015.htm LI Y, LIU Y M, ZHANG N, et al. Correlation analysis between Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fracture and knee function[J]. Chongqing Med J, 2016, 45(12): 1629-1631. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQYX201612015.htm
[8]	裴君. CT、MRI在胫骨平台骨折临床诊断及AO分型中的应用效果对比[J]. 黔南民族医专学报, 2019, 32(2): 93-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QNYX201902006.htm PEI J. Comparison of CT and MRI in clinical diagnosis and AO classification of tibial plateau fractures[J]. J Qiannan Med Coll Nation, 2019, 32(2): 93-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QNYX201902006.htm
[9]	杨洋, 冯青, 李冕, 等. 膝关节多韧带损伤与胫骨平台骨折分型系统的相关性研究[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2020, 35(2): 124-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202002004.htm YANG Y, FENG Q, LI M, et al. Study on the correlation between knee multi ligament injury and tibial plateau fracture classification system[J]. Chin J Bone & Joint Injury, 2020, 35(2): 124-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202002004.htm
[10]	孙杰, 卜国云, 张金利. 骨质疏松性胫骨平台骨折的治疗进展[J]. 天津医药, 2018, 46(8): 894-899. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYZ201808026.htm SUN J, BU G Y, ZHANG J L. Treatment progress of osteoporotic tibial plateau fracture[J]. Tianjin Pharmac, 2018, 46(8): 894-899. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYZ201808026.htm
[11]	吴兴源, 张国如, 郑德攀, 等. 胫骨平台骨折合并交叉韧带损伤患者行关节镜治疗的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(10): 12-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ202010004.htm WU X Y, ZHANG G R, ZHENG D P, et al. Analysis of the efficacy and safety of arthroscopic treatment of tibial plateau fractures with cruciate ligament injury[J]. Chin J Endosc, 2020, 26(10): 12-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGNJ202010004.htm
[12]	胡春宁, 任一, 唐广应, 等. 关节镜下辅助治疗胫骨平台骨折合并交叉韧带损伤的临床效果分析[J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2020, 31(4): 439-440. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKHT202004028.htm HU C N, YI Y, TANG G Y, et al. Clinical effect analysis of adjuvant treatment of tibial plateau fracture with cruciate ligament injury under arthroscopy[J]. J Aerosp Med, 2020, 31(4): 439-440. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKHT202004028.htm
[13]	张宇, 胡军, 宋李军, 等. Schatzker Ⅳ型胫骨平台骨折韧带损伤的MRI观察及对膝关节稳定性的影响[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2020, 22(11): 927-932. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWWK202010010.htm ZHANG Y, HU J, SONG L J, et al. MRI observation of ligament injury in Schatzker type Ⅳ tibial plateau fracture and its effect on knee stability[J]. Chin J Traum Orthop, 2020, 22(11): 927-932. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWWK202010010.htm
[14]	宋阳. 力生长因子在膝关节前交叉韧带损伤修复及软骨退变调控中的作用研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2018. SONG Y. Study on the role of force growth factor in the repair of anterior cruciate ligament injury and the regulation of cartilage degeneration[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Univers, 2018.
[15]	范立北, 金宪政, 贾斌. 不同手术时机对前交叉韧带损伤术后膝关节功能的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(1): 60-63. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000017 FAN L B, JIN X Z, JIA B. Effect of different surgical timing on knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury surgery[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2018, 16(1): 60-63. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000017
[16]	鲍飞龙, 刘涛, 亢世杰, 等. 双反牵引装置治疗Schatzker分型Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的优势[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 4(5): 266-270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNGK201805003.htm BAO F L, LIU T, KANG S J, et al. Advantages of double anti traction device in the treatment of Schatzker type Ⅴ and Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures[J]. Chin J Geriatr Orthop & Rehabilit, 2018, 4(5): 266-270. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNGK201805003.htm
[17]	饶海军, 林学扬, 李瑾, 等. Schatzker分型胫骨平台骨折术后膝关节功能评分与骨性关节炎发生的相关性分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2020, 35(8): 850-852. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202008024.htm RAO H J, LIN X Y, LI J, et al. Correlation analysis between knee function score and osteoarthritis after operation of tibial plateau fracture classified by Schatzker[J]. Chin J Bone & Joint Injury, 2020, 35(8): 850-852. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGJS202008024.htm
[18]	NIEMOLLER H G, GREYKING P, BIRKHOLTZF F, et al. Ability of the Schatzker classification to predict posteromedial fragmentation in tibial plateau fractures[J]. SAOJ, 2018, 17(3): 16-19.
[19]	JAYAKUMAR P, TEUNIS T, GIMéNEZ B B, et al. AO Distal radius fracture classification: Global perspective on observer agreement[J]. J Wrist Surg, 2017, 6(1): 46-53.
[20]	STODDART M, PEARCE O, SMITE J, et al. Proximal humerus fractures: Reliability of neer versus AO classification on plain radiographs and computed tomography[J]. Cureus, 2020, 12(6): 251-258.
[21]	TAŞKESEN A, DEMIRKALE ⅰ, OKKAOǦLU M C, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems[J]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi, 2017, 28(3): 177-181. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2017.56816
[22]	赵耀伟, 谢加兵, 王林, 等. 胫骨平台骨折的分型与治疗进展[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2018, 46(1): 18-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLYS201801009.htm ZHAO Y W, XIE J B, WANG L, et al. Classification and treatment progress of tibial plateau fractures[J]. Chin J Clinic, 2018, 46(1): 18-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLYS201801009.htm