改良延续性护理对经腹腔镜远端胃切除术后胃癌患者手术应激及免疫功能的影响

汤婷; 张强; 王翔; 何丽芸; 张文斌

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002478

改良延续性护理对经腹腔镜远端胃切除术后胃癌患者手术应激及免疫功能的影响

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002478

汤婷¹,
张强¹,
王翔¹,
何丽芸¹,
张文斌^2, ,

1.
新疆医科大学第一附属医院中心手术室，新疆乌鲁木齐 830054
2.
新疆医科大学第一附属医院胃肠(肿瘤)外科，新疆乌鲁木齐 830054

基金项目:

国家卫生计生委医药卫生科技发展研究中心科研项目 W2017ZWS05

详细信息

通讯作者:
张文斌, E-mail：zwb3216@sina.com

中图分类号: R473.6 R735.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 321
- HTML全文浏览量: 165
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-04-18
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-05

Effect of improved continuous nursing on surgical stress and immune function in patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

1.
Central Operating Room, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830054, China

摘要

摘要: 目的分析基于加速康复外科理念的改良延续性护理对经腹腔镜远端胃切除术后的胃癌患者手术应激及免疫功能的影响。方法选择2018年6月—2020年6月新疆医科大学第一附属医院98例行经腹腔镜远端胃切除术的胃癌患者，并按随机数字表法分为观察组(49例)和对照组(49例)，对照组采用常规护理，观察组采用基于加速康复外科理念的改良延续性护理，比较术后不同阶段应激功能指标的变化；比较2组患者免疫功能指标的变化。结果 2组患者术后第1、4、7天IL-6、IL-8、IL-10较术前均有所升高，且观察组术后第1、4、7天IL-6、IL-8水平明显低于对照组(均P＜0.05)；2组患者术后第1、4天CD4⁺、CD8⁺、CD4⁺/CD8⁺均有所下降，而术后第7天CD4⁺较术前升高，差异有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)，组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)；2组患者术后第1、4天的IgA、IgG、IgM水平均相较于术前有所降低，组间差异有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)，第7天IgA、IgG、IgM基本回到术前水平，且观察组第1、4、7天IgA、IgG均高于对照组，组间差异有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)。结论基于加速康复外科理念的改良延续性护理可有效提高行经腹腔镜远端胃切除术的胃癌患者的临床效果，降低其应激炎性反应，并一定程度促进患者免疫功能的恢复与改善，进而促进术后胃癌患者的康复。
- 加速康复外科理念 /
- 改良延续性护理 /
- 经腹腔镜远端胃切除 /
- 应激功能 /
- 免疫功能
Abstract: Objective To analyze the impact of improved continuous nursing based on the concept of accelerated rehabilitation surgery on the surgical stress and immune function of gastric cancer patients after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Methods From June 2018 to June 2020, 98 patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were selected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. They were divided into the observation group (49 cases) and control group (49 cases) according to the random number table method. The control group was given conventional nursing interventions, whereas the observation group was given improved continuous nursing based on the concept of accelerated rehabilitation surgery. Changes of stress function indexes at different stages and immune function indexes of both groups were compared after surgery. Results The levels of inflammatory mediators (IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10) of both groups on the 1st, 4th and 7th day after the operation increased compared with those before the operation, and the levels of IL-6 and IL-8 of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (all P < 0.05). The two groups of patients had a decrease in CD4⁺, CD8⁺ and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ levels on the 1st and 4 th day after operation, while CD4⁺ increased on the 7th day after operation (all P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The levels of IgA, IgG and IgM on the 1st and 4th days decreased, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (all P < 0.05). On the 7th day, the levels of IgA, IgG and IgM basically returned to the preoperative level. The levels of IgA and IgG of the observation group on days 1, 4 and 7 were higher than those of the control group, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Conclusion The improved continuous nursing based on the concept of accelerated rehabilitation surgery can effectively improve the clinical effect of gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, reduce their stress inflammatory response, promote the recovery and improvement of their immune function to a certain extent and promote their recovery after surgery.
- Accelerated rehabilitation surgery concept /
- Improved continuous nursing /
- Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy /
- Stress function /
- Immune function

HTML全文

表 1 2组胃癌患者临床指标对比

Table 1. Comparison of clinical indicators between two groups of gastric cancer patients

组别	例数	首次排便时间 (x±s, h)	首次排气时间 (x±s, h)	并发症 [例(%)]
观察组	49	22.74±2.34	29.64±2.47	5(10.20)
对照组	49	31.68±2.78	35.73±2.79	14(28.57)
统计量		17.222^a	11.440^a	5.288^b
P值		< 0.001	< 0.001	0.021
注：^a为t值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组胃癌患者应激指标炎性介质比较(x±s)

Table 2. Comparison of inflammatory mediators of stress index between two groups of gastric cancer patients (x±s)

组别	例数	IL-6(ng/L)
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	2.43±0.35	35.26±3.24^a	23.57±2.46^ab	11.28±1.23^abc
对照组	49	2.39±0.34	49.52±4.76^a	37.64±3.59^ab	15.86±1.63^abc
t值		0.574	17.336	22.631	15.700
P值		0.567	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

组别	例数	IL-8(ng/L)
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	1.82±0.25	27.45±3.54^a	11.58±1.32^ab	2.86±0.63^abc
对照组	49	1.79±0.24	34.42±4.06^a	23.17±2.21^ab	9.56±1.05^abc
t值		0.606	9.058	31.517	38.301
P值		0.546	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

组别	例数	IL-10(ng/L)
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	125.62±5.89	207.43±9.78^a	175.45±8.45^ab	167.47±7.35^abc
对照组	49	123.86±5.67	199.56±9.12^a	145.42±6.40^ab	141.32±6.53^abc
t值		1.507	4.120	19.831	18.618
P值		0.135	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
注: 与同组术前比较，^aP < 0.05;与同组手术后第1天比较，^bP < 0.05;与同组术后第4天比较，^cP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组胃癌患者细胞免疫指标比较(x±s)

Table 3. Comparison of cellular immune indexes between two groups of gastric cancer patients (x±s)

组别	例数	CD4⁺(%)
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	31.57±1.54	29.25±1.21^a	31.29±1.56^b	36.28±1.83^abc
对照组	49	31.38±1.49	27.54±1.22^a	30.64±3.59^b	35.96±1.81^abc
t值		0.621	47.705	1.162	0.870
P值		0.536	< 0.001	0.248	0.386

组别	例数	CD8⁺(%)
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	24.12±2.23	21.02±2.04^a	22.59±2.12^b	23.86±2.15^bc
对照组	49	23.89±2.21	20.82±2.06^a	21.67±2.11^b	22.98±2.14^bc
t值		0.513	0.483	2.153	2.031
P值		0.609	0.630	0.034	0.045

组别	例数	CD4⁺/CD8⁺
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	1.32±0.19	1.29±0.18	1.15±0.15	1.42±0.22
对照组	49	1.29±0.17	1.27±0.16	1.16±0.14	1.43±0.23
t值		0.824	0.581	0.341	0.220
P值		0.412	0.562	0.734	0.826
注: 与同组术前比较，^aP < 0.05;与同组手术后第1天比较，^bP < 0.05;与同组术后第4天比较，^cP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 2组胃癌患者体液免疫指标比较(x±s, g/L)

Table 4. Comparison of humoral immune indexes between two groups of gastric cancer patients (x±s, g/L)

组别	例数	IgA
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	2.17±0.14	1.85±0.11^a	2.16±0.15^b	2.23±0.17^bc
对照组	49	2.18±0.15	1.54±0.09^a	1.64±0.14^b	2.06±0.16^bc
t值		0.341	15.268	17.740	5.097
P值		0.734	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

组别	例数	IgG
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	12.11±1.23	10.82±1.04^a	10.27±1.32^b	12.36±1.25
对照组	49	11.89±1.21	10.02±1.06^a	9.26±1.17^b	11.78±1.18
t值		0.893	3.771	4.008	2.362
P值		0.374	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.020

组别	例数	IgM
组别	例数	术前	术后第1天	术后第4天	术后第7天
观察组	49	1.62±0.13	0.91±0.08^a	1.51±0.11^b	1.61±0.12^bc
对照组	49	1.59±0.12	0.90±0.08^a	1.47±0.12^b	1.60±0.12^bc
t值		1.187	0.619	1.720	0.412
P值		0.238	0.538	0.089	0.681
注: 与同组术前比较，^aP < 0.05;与同组手术后第1天比较，^bP < 0.05;与同组术后第4天比较，^cP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	朱伟珍, 谢艳茹, 吴龙英. 延续性护理在HER2阳性胃癌患者靶向治疗后的应用效果[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(4): 690-692, 701. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000768 ZHU W Z, XIE Y R, WU L Y. Application of continuity nursing in targeted treatment of HER2 positive gastric cancer patients and the impact on quality of life[J]. Chinese general practice, 2019, 17(4): 690-692, 701. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000768
[2]	邓大君. 《世界癌症报告》2020版问世: 调整癌症预防对策, 适应癌症流行新趋势[J]. 肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志, 2020, 6(3): 27-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLZD202003005.htm DENG D J. World Cancer Report 2020 comes out-adjusting cancer prevention strategies to adapt to the new trend of cancer epidemic[J]. Journal of Multidisciplinary Cancer Management(Electronic Version), 2020, 6(3): 27-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLZD202003005.htm
[3]	杨勇. 胃黏膜相关淋巴瘤内镜检查与临床病理诊断研究[J]. 临床检验杂志: 电子版, 2019, 8(4): 142-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNJI201904114.htm YANG Y. Endoscopic examination and clinicopathological diagnosis of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoma[J]. Clinical Laboratory Journal(Electronic Edition), 2019, 8(4): 142-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LNJI201904114.htm
[4]	TAN Z. Recent advances in the surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer: A review[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2019, 25: 3537-3541. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916475
[5]	NISHIZAWA T, YAHAGI N. Long-term outcomes of using endoscopic submucosal dissection to treat early gastric cancer[J]. Gut Liver, 2018, 12(2): 119-124. doi: 10.5009/gnl17095
[6]	朱凯宁, 曹毅, 冯宗峰, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统五孔腹腔镜远端胃切除术近期疗效及生活质量的前瞻性对照研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(1): 35-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW202001011.htm ZHU K N, CAO Y, FENG Z F, et al. A prospective controlled study of short-term efficacy and quality of life of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy and conventional five-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy[J]. Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, 2020, 25(1): 35-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW202001011.htm
[7]	范桂娣, 胡雪萍. 加速康复外科围手术期护理在胃癌患者中的应用研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2018, 33(14): 1288-1291. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201814011.htm FAN G D, HU X P. Study for the application of accelerated perioperative nursing in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2018, 33(14): 1288-1291. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201814011.htm
[8]	CARTER-BROOKS C M, DU A L, RUPPERT K M. Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 219(5): 495. DOI: 10.1016/ajog.2018.06.009.
[9]	邱海波, 周志伟. NCCN胃癌临床实践指南2017年第五版更新要点解读[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(2): 160-164. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2018.02.008 QIU H B, ZHOU Z W. Updates and interpretation on NCCN clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2017 version 5[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2018, 21(2): 160-164. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2018.02.008
[10]	李航, 吴锷, 刘盛, 等. 胃癌患者术前胃镜活检病理与外科术后病理诊断对照分析[J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2018, 22(9): 1541-1542. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2018.09.016 LI H, WU E, LIU S, et al. Comparative analysis of preoperative endoscopic biopsy pathology and postoperative pathology in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis, 2018, 22(9): 1541-1542. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2018.09.016
[11]	胡婷, 汪子书. 胃癌组织中TFF3和PDGFR的表达及临床意义[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(12): 1989-1991. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000542 HU T, WANG Z S. The expression and clinical significance of TFF3 and PDGFR in gastric carcinoma[J]. Chinese general practice, 2018, 16(12): 1989-1991. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000542
[12]	WU J Y, LEE Y C, GRAHAM D Y. The eradication of Helicobacter pylori to prevent gastric cancer: A critical appraisal[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 13(1): 17-24. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1542299
[13]	SANJEEVAIAH A, CHEEDELLA N, HESTER C, et al. Gastric cancer: Recent molecular classification advances, racial disparity, and management implications[J]. J Oncol Pract, 2018, 14(4): 217-224. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00025
[14]	鲍晨辉, 赵滢. 肠内营养在实施加速康复外科的老年胃癌患者中的应用[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2018, 26(1): 84-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2018.01.022 BAO C H, ZHAO Y. Application of enteral nutrition in elderly gastric cancer patients treated by fast track surgery[J]. Journal of Modern Oncology, 2018, 26(1): 84-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2018.01.022
[15]	王爱红, 罗娜, 赵皓冰. 快速康复护理对胃癌患者术后应激及康复的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2018, 25(1): 95-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZK201801026.htm WANG A H, LUO N, ZHAO H B. Effect of rapid rehabilitation nursing on postoperative stress and recovery in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation, 2018, 25(1): 95-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZK201801026.htm
[16]	DUNKMAN W J, MANNING M W. Enhanced recovery after surgery and multimodal strategies for analgesia[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2018, 98(6): 1171-1184. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.07.005
[17]	李燕, 杨川川, 孙昌裕, 等. 加速康复理念下术前机械性肠道准备对胃癌术后康复相关影响的研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(4): 524-528. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.04.010 LI Y, YANG C C, SUN C Y, et al. The effects of preoperative Mechanical Bowel Preparation on postoperative gastric cancer patients under the concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2020, 20(4): 524-528. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.04.010
[18]	王英, 徐娟. 肠内营养支持联合加速康复护理对胃癌全胃切除术患者的护理疗效[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2019, 25(2): 73-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9577.2019.02.018 WANG Y, XU J. Nursing efficacy of enteral nutrition support combined with accelerated rehabilitation nursing for patients with gastric carcinoma after total gastrectomy[J]. Food and Nutrition in China, 2019, 25(2): 73-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9577.2019.02.018
[19]	RUBINKIEWICZ M, WITOWSKI J, SU M. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(Suppl 5): S685-S691.
[20]	程康文, 王贵和. 加速康复外科对腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者炎症因子与免疫功能的影响[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017, 22(1): 30-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201701006.htm CHENG K W, WANG G H. Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on inflammatory factor and immune function after laparoscopic radical operation for patients with gastric cancer[J]. Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, 2017, 22(1): 30-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW201701006.htm