基于加速康复外科理念的术前护理干预模式在老年腰椎管狭窄症手术患者中的应用研究

张杨西贝; 柏彬; 马杰; 周平辉

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002257

基于加速康复外科理念的术前护理干预模式在老年腰椎管狭窄症手术患者中的应用研究

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002257

张杨西贝^{1, 2},
柏彬^{1, 2},
马杰^{1, 2},
周平辉^{1, 2, ,}

1.
蚌埠医学院第一附属医院骨科，安徽蚌埠 233004
2.
组织移植安徽省重点实验室，安徽蚌埠 233030

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 31700854

详细信息

通讯作者:
周平辉，E-mail：270806423@qq.com

中图分类号: R473.6 R493
计量
- 文章访问数: 271
- HTML全文浏览量: 129
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-11-30
- 网络出版日期: 2022-03-02

Application of preoperative nursing intervention mode based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

ZHANG-YANG Xi-bei^{1, 2},
BO Bin^{1, 2},
MA Jie^{1, 2},
ZHOU Ping-hui^{1, 2
, ,}

1.
Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui 233004, China

摘要

摘要: 目的研究基于加速康复外科理念的术前护理干预对老年腰椎管狭窄症患者睡眠质量、焦虑情绪及术后并发症的影响。方法选取蚌埠医学院第一附属医院2017年7月—2019年6月因腰椎管狭窄症行腰椎手术的102例65岁以上患者，按随机数字表法分为对照组(51例)与观察组(51例)。对照组实施医院骨科常规护理，观察组实施基于加速康复外科理念的术前护理干预措施。比较2组患者护理干预前后睡眠质量、焦虑情绪、术后并发症及护理满意度的差异。结果干预前2组患者一般资料、焦虑情绪及睡眠质量比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预后，观察组匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表得分为(6.20±1.60)分，对照组得分为(13.35±2.27)分，组间差异有统计学意义(t=18.402，P < 0.001)；观察组焦虑自评量表得分为(38.42±8.99)分，对照组得分为(44.63±8.92)分，组间差异有统计学意义(t=3.505，P=0.001)；观察组术后并发症发生率(5.88%)低于对照组(19.61%，χ²=4.320，P=0.038)；观察组护理总满意率为96.08%，对照组为80.39%，组间差异有统计学意义(χ²=15.389，P < 0.001)。结论基于加速康复外科理念的术前护理干预模式应用于老年腰椎管狭窄症疾病中，能有效提高患者睡眠质量，改善患者焦虑情绪，降低术后并发症发生率，同时能提升患者对医疗服务及质量的满意度。
- 加速康复外科 /
- 术前护理 /
- 老年人 /
- 腰椎管狭窄症
Abstract: Objective To study the effects of preoperative nursing intervention based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery on sleep quality, anxiety and postoperative complications in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods The clinical data of 102 patients (age>65 years) who underwent lumbar spinal surgery due to lumbar spinal stenosis from July 2017 to June 2019 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College were randomly divided into the control group (n=51) and experimental group (n=51). The control group received routine orthopaedic care in the hospital, whilst the experimental group received preoperative nursing interventions based on the concept of accelerated rehabilitation surgery. The differences in sleep quality, anxiety, postoperative complications and nursing satisfaction between the two groups before and after nursing intervention were compared. Results No significant differences were found in the general information, anxiety and sleep quality between the two groups before intervention (all P>0.05). After intervention, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores in the experimental group and the control group were (6.20±1.60) points and (13.35±2.27) points, respectively, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (t=18.402, P < 0.001). The scores of the self-rating anxiety scale were (38.42±8.99) points in the experimental group and (44.63±8.92) points in the control group, with statistically significant difference between groups (t=3.505, P=0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group (5.88%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (19.61%), and the difference between groups was significant (χ²=4.320, P=0.038). The nursing satisfaction was 96.08% in the experimental group and 80.39% in the control group, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (χ²=15.389, P < 0.001). Conclusion The preoperative nursing intervention mode based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery can effectively improve the sleep quality of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, improve the anxiety of patients, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve the satisfaction of patients with medical services and quality.
- Enhanced recovery after surgery /
- Preoperative care /
- Elderly /
- Lumbar spinal stenosis

HTML全文

表 1 2组老年腰椎管狭窄症手术患者一般资料比较

组别	例数	年龄 (x±s, 岁)	病程 (x±s, 年)	性别(例)		累及椎体个数(例)
组别	例数	年龄 (x±s, 岁)	病程 (x±s, 年)	男性	女性	1	2	3	4
对照组	51	74.22±8.21	5.53±3.29	30	21	12	15	14	10
观察组	51	75.43±7.24	6.72±4.67	36	15	10	16	16	9
统计量		0.793^a	1.944^a	1.545^b		0.400^b
P值		0.429	0.055	0.214		0.940
注：^a为t值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组老年腰椎管狭窄症手术患者护理满意度比较[例(%)]

组别	例数	非常满意	基本满意	不满意	总满意
对照组	51	27(52.94)	14(27.45)	10(19.60)	41(80.39)
观察组	51	45(88.24)	4(7.84)	2(3.92)	49(96.08)
注：2组总满意率比较，χ²=15.389，P < 0.001。

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 2组老年腰椎管狭窄症手术患者干预前后睡眠质量与焦虑情绪比较(x±s, 分)

组别	例数	PSQI		SAS
组别	例数	入院6 h内	出院当日	入院6 h内	出院当日
对照组	51	13.45±2.88	13.35±2.27	45.02±11.48	44.63±8.92
观察组	51	13.24±2.47	6.20±1.60^a	44.71±9.86	38.42±8.99^a
t值		0.406	18.402	0.148	3.505
P值		0.686	< 0.001	0.883	0.001
注：与同组干预前比较，^aP < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(18)

[1]	柳根哲, 徐林, 李春根, 等. 显微内窥镜下治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的初步探讨[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2007, 15(9): 645-647. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8478.2007.09.002
[2]	LEE S Y, KIM T H, OH J K, et al. Lumbar stenosis: A recent update by review of literature[J]. Asian Spine, 2015, 9(5): 818-828. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.818
[3]	吴强, 贝抗胜, 熊英辉, 等. 后路椎间盘镜显微治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2004, 27(3): 212-213. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2004.03.020
[4]	雷扬, 朱冬承, 韦秀芳, 等. 腰椎管狭窄症患者行椎管成形术中保留腰椎后柱结构对疗效的影响[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2018, 39(1): 118-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYTZ201801039.htm
[5]	陈科, 朱立新, 陈仲, 等. 腰椎管狭窄症患者行经皮脊柱内窥镜治疗后发生腰椎手术失败综合征的影响因素[J]. 广西医学, 2018, 40(22): 2678-2681. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GYYX201822013.htm
[6]	KALFF R, EWALD C, WASCHKE A, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: Current treatment options[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2013, 110(37): 613-624.
[7]	CHOPRA S S, SCHMIDT S C, FOTOPOU C, et al. Evidence-based perioperative management: Strategic shifts in times of fasts track surgery[J]. Anticancer Res, 2009, 29(7): 2799-2802.
[8]	田伟, 吴新宝, 余斌, 等. 骨科手术围手术期禁食禁饮管理指南[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2019, 21(10): 829-834. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2019.10.001
[9]	刘志喜, 石倩萍, 杨洪霞, 等. 匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表在护理人群中的信效度评价[J]. 汕头大学医学院学报, 2020, 33(3): 173-176. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STDY202003011.htm
[10]	田银娣, 王怡恺, 李静, 等. 焦虑和抑郁量表在肝硬化患者临床应用中的信效度评价[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2019, 22(1): 105-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GBSY201901028.htm
[11]	陈龙梅, 王珩. 腰椎间盘突出症患者抑郁、焦虑状况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2014, 20(6): 437-440. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2014.06.018
[12]	朱薇, 贾东林, 刘晓光, 等. 慢性腰腿痛住院病人焦虑抑郁状态及其对疼痛的影响[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2017, 23(3): 200-204. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2017.03.008
[13]	BAIR M J, WU J W, DAMUSH T M, et al. Association of depression and anxiety alone and in combination with chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care patients[J]. Psychosomatic Med, 2008, 70(8): 890-897.
[14]	SIVERTSEN B, 杜涛. 成人睡眠与疼痛敏感性[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2016, 22(6): 409-410, 416. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2016.06.003
[15]	张如意, 游秋云, 张舜波, 等. 睡眠及睡眠剥夺与人体免疫系统的相关性探讨[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2016, 31(10): 4169-4171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY201610091.htm
[16]	荀林娟, 施雁, 宋瑞梅, 等. 快速康复外科护理对高龄腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者手术应激及术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(11): 1343-1346. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL201811014.htm
[17]	赵媛, 彭贵凌. 优化术前禁食禁饮流程对创伤骨科择期手术患者的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(4): 523-526. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL201904010.htm
[18]	周卫敏, 王燕萍, 张巧茹. 经皮椎弓根螺钉治疗腰椎骨折的临床护理[J]. 河南科技大学学报(医学版), 2013, 31(2): 150-151. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYYZ201302041.htm