毫火针联合卤米松及白灵方治疗顽固性白癜风的效果观察

戴婷; 刘进芬; 李大宁; 刘佳; 李红敏

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002020

毫火针联合卤米松及白灵方治疗顽固性白癜风的效果观察

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002020

1.
复旦大学附属中山医院徐汇医院皮肤科，上海 200032
2.
江苏省中医院皮肤科，江苏南京 210029

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 81903968

详细信息

通讯作者:
李红敏, E-mail: lihongmin1983@163.com

中图分类号: R758.41 R245.31
计量
- 文章访问数: 126
- HTML全文浏览量: 28
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-02-25
- 网络出版日期: 2022-02-16

Fire-needle therapy combined with halometasone and Bailing prescription the treatment of resistant vitiligo

1.
Department of Dermatology, Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China

摘要

摘要: 目的顽固性白癜风是困扰患者的临床疾病，本研究旨在评价毫火针联合白灵方及卤米松治疗顽固性白癜风的临床效果。方法选取徐汇医院皮肤科既往接受1年以上白癜风治疗，病情抵抗，疗效不佳的顽固性白癜风患者，开展随机、自身、对照临床研究。对照组外用卤米松联合口服白灵方每日1剂，研究组在对照组的基础上加用毫火针治疗，每2周1次，疗程12周。根据全国中西医结合皮肤性病学会色素性皮肤病学组制定的白癜风疗效标准判定疗效。对比2组治疗疗效(显效率、有效率)及不良反应发生率的差异。结果 42例患者共64处靶皮损纳入分析。研究组显效率为40.6%(26/64靶皮损)，基础治疗组显效率为21.9%(14/64靶皮损)。研究组总有效率为71.8%(46/64靶皮损)，基础治疗组总有效率为48.4%(31/64靶皮损)，联合毫火针治疗组疗效明显优于对照组(P＜0.05)。研究组与对照组分别有3例及2例患者发生不良反应，不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论对于顽固性白癜风，在外用卤米松及口服白灵方的基础上，联合毫火针有显著的增加效应，且没有增加不良反应。显示了毫火针在顽固性白癜风联合治疗中的优势。
- 毫火针 /
- 白癜风 /
- 增加效应
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the add-on effect of fire-needle therapy combined with Bailing prescription and halomethasone in the treatment of resistant vitiligo. Methods Patients with refractory vitiligo who had received vitiligo treatment for more than one year in the Department of Dermatology of Xuhui Hospital were selected to carry out a randomized, self controlled clinical study. The control group was treated with halometasone combined with Bailing prescription once a day, while the study group was treated with fire-needle therapy on the basis of the control group, once every two weeks, with a course of 12 weeks. According to the efficacy standard of vitiligo formulated by pigmented dermatology group of national society of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine dermatology and Venereology, the efficacy was determined. The curative effect (significant efficiency, effective rate) and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 64 target lesions in 42 patients were included in the analysis. The significant efficiency of the combination group was 40.6%, and that of the basic treatment group was 21.9%. The effective rate of the combination group was 71.8%, and the basic treatment group was 48.4%. The combination group showed significantly superior efficacy than that of the basic treatment group (P < 0.05). There were 3 cases and 2 cases of adverse reactions in the combination group and the basic treatment group respectively, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions (P>0.05). Conclusion The fire-needle therapy combined with Bailing prescription and halomethasone can significantly increase the treatment effect of refractory vitiligo, and does not increase the adverse reactions. It shows the advantage of milli fire acupuncture in the treatment of refractory vitiligo.
- Fire-needle /
- Vitiligo /
- Add-on effect

HTML全文

表 1 2组顽固性白癜风患者疗效比较

组别	例数	靶皮损数(处)	痊愈靶皮损数(处)	显效靶皮损数(处)	有效靶皮损数(处)	无效靶皮损数(处)	显效率 (%)	有效率 (%)
研究组	42	64	4	22	20	18	40.6	71.8
对照组	42	64	2	12	17	33	21.9	48.4
注：2组显效率比较，χ²=5.236，P=0.022;2组有效率比较，χ²=7.334，P=0.007。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组顽固性白癜风患者不良反应比较

组别	例数	红斑 (例)	感染 (例)	疤痕 (例)	色素沉着(例)	合计 (例)	不良反应率 (%)
研究组	42	1	1	1	0	3	7.1
对照组	42	1	1	0	0	2	4.8
注：2组不良反应发生率比较，χ²=0.208，P=0.650。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(15)

[1]	ROBERTS G H L, SANTORICO S A, SPRITZ R A. The genetic architecture of vitiligo[J]. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res, 2020, 33(1): 8-15. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12848
[2]	BERGQVIST C, EZZEDINE K. Vitiligo: A review[J]. Dermatology, 2020, 236(6): 571-592. doi: 10.1159/000506103
[3]	RODRIGUES M, EZZEDINE K, HAMZAVI I, et al. New discoveries in the pathogenesis and classification of vitiligo[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017, 77(1): 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.10.048
[4]	热孜万古丽·乌买尔, 米吉提·吾普尔, 阿布力米提·局马. 调节性T细胞在白癜风与自身免疫性甲状腺疾病发生中的免疫机制[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(8): 1415-1418. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY201708043.htm
[5]	李曼, 王利娟, 赵明福, 等. 难治性白癜风的治疗进展[J]. 中国麻风皮肤病杂志, 2019, 35(5): 313-317. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MALA201905022.htm
[6]	DILLON A B, SIDERIS A, HADI A, et al. Advances in vitiligo: An update on medical and surgical treatments[J]. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 2017, 10(1): 15-28. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210378
[7]	赵志豪, 吴育菡. 308 nm准分子激光联合退白汤治疗白癜风的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(10): 1675-1677, 1786. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202010018.htm
[8]	中国中西医结合学会皮肤性病专业委员会色素病学组. 白癜风临床分型及疗效标准(2003年修订稿)[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2004, 37(7): 440. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHPF200407029.htm
[9]	戴辉, 姜红岩, 许爱娥. 加味桃红四物汤联合他克莫司软膏治疗气滞血瘀型白癜风的疗效观察[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2019, 39(10): 1185-1188. doi: 10.7661/j.cjim.20190621.276
[10]	戴婷, 宋宁静, 许瑾, 等. 联合火针治疗斑秃增加效应的Meta分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(10): 1750-1752, 1796. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202010038.htm
[11]	林佳, 陈彬, 张善雳. 毫火针联合他克莫司软膏治疗气滞血瘀型白癜风50例[J]. 福建中医药, 2020, 51(2): 85-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJZY202002032.htm
[12]	王卫亮, 陈燕, 刘奉彬, 等. 毫火针、白癜风颗粒、窄谱中波紫外线三联疗法对白癜风患者外周血中的IL-17、IL-10、IL-22表达的影响[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2018, 24(15): 2245-2248, 2251. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2018.15.007
[13]	孙璐璐, 刘华绪, 王真真, 等. 毫火针辅助308nm准分子激光治疗不同部位白癜风疗效观察[J]. 中国针灸, 2019, 39(9): 936-939, 952. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZE201909007.htm
[14]	LIU L, WU Y, ZHANG J, et al. Ablative fractional CO₂ laser aided delivery of long-acting glucocorticoid in the treatment of acral vitiligo: A multicenter, prospective, self-bilateral controlled study[J]. J Dermatolog Treat, 2019, 30(4): 320-327. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1509048
[15]	LUO Y, QIAN W, DAI T, et al. A New therapy for vitiligo using fire needles: A systematic review of evidence from 3618 subjects[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2020, 2020: 8492097. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/343943684_A_New_Therapy_for_Vitiligo_Using_Fire_Needles_A_Systematic_Review_of_Evidence_from_3618_Subjects