Relationship between psychosocial adjustment, post-traumatic growth and self-efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer
-
摘要:
目的 卵巢癌患者创伤后成长(PTG)、自我效能感、心理社会适应能力之间关系的研究较少。本研究探讨卵巢癌患者心理社会适应水平与PTG、自我效能感的关系, 以期为今后此类患者临床干预提供依据。 方法 于2022年6月-2023年11月采用方便抽样方法对河北大学附属医院收治的228例卵巢癌患者进行问卷调查, 采用Pearson相关性分析研究心理社会适应量表(PAIS-SR)评分与中文版创伤后成长评定量表(PTGI)评分和中文版癌症自我效能评估量表(C-SUPPH)评分的关系; 应用多元线性回归分析探究患者心理社会适应水平的影响因素。 结果 本研究调查表回收有效率为99.12%(226/228);确诊时间≤1个月、分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者PAIS-SR评分高于确诊时间>1个月、分期Ⅰ~Ⅱ期的患者(t=3.705、2.429, P < 0.05);相关性分析显示PAIS-SR与PTGI、C-SUPPH呈负相关关系(r=-0.540、-0.557, P < 0.05), 与蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)呈正相关关系(r=0.584, P < 0.05);回归分析显示新的可能性(β=-2.010)、对生活的欣赏(β=-0.929)、情绪控制(β=-1.276)、人际关系协调(β=1.930)以及MoCA评分(β=-0.411)是卵巢癌患者心理社会适应水平的影响因素(P < 0.05)。 结论 卵巢癌患者心理社会适应水平普遍较低, 这与患者PTG、自我效能感、认知功能均有一定关系。 Abstract:Objective There are relatively few studies on the relationship among post-traumatic growth (PTG), self-efficacy and psychosocial adaptability in patients with ovarian cancer.This study explores the relationship between the psychosocial adaptation level, PTG and self-efficacy, with the aim of providing a basis for clinical intervention of such patients in the future. Methods A total of 228 patients with ovarian cancer treated in Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University from June 2022 to November 2023 were investigated by questionnaire using convenient sampling method.Pearson correlation was used to analyze the relationship of self-report psychosocial adjustment to illness scale (PAIS-SR) with post-traumatic growth inventory (PTGI) score and Chinese-version strategies used by people to promote health (C-SUPPH) in ovarian cancer patients.Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of psychosocial adaptation level of patients. Results In this study, the recovery efficiency rate of questionnaires was 99.12%(226/228).The PAIS-SR scores of patients with diagnosis time ≤1 month and disease stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ were higher than those with diagnosis time >1 month and disease stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ(t=3.705 and 2.429, P < 0.05).Correlation analysis showed that PAIS-SR score was negatively correlated with PTGI and C-SUPPH (r=-0.540 and-0.557, P < 0.05), and positively correlated with Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA, r=0.584, P < 0.05).Regression analysis showed that new possibilities (β=-2.010), appreciation of life (β=-0.929), emotional control (β=-1.276), interpersonal relationship (β=1.930) and MoCA score (β=-0.411) were the influencing factors of psychosocial adaptation level in ovarian cancer patients (P < 0.05). Conclusion Ovarian cancer patients generally have a low level of psychosocial adaptation level, which is related to PTG, self-efficacy and cognitive function to some extent. -
Key words:
- Ovarian cancer /
- Psychosocial adjustment level /
- Post-traumatic growth /
- Self-efficacy
-
表 1 226例卵巢癌患者一般资料情况
Table 1. General information of 226 patients with ovarian cancer
项目 例数 占比(%) 年龄 ≤40岁 59 26.11 >40岁 167 73.89 学历 高中及以下 132 58.41 大专及以上 94 41.59 家庭收入 < 5 000元/月 102 45.13 ≥5 000元/月 124 54.87 婚姻状况 有配偶 168 74.34 无配偶 58 25.66 工作状况 在职 131 57.96 非在职 95 42.04 支付方式 医保支付 148 65.49 自费支付 78 34.51 确诊时间 ≤1个月 119 52.65 >1个月 107 47.35 疾病分期 Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 127 56.19 Ⅲ~Ⅳ期 99 43.81 治疗方式 手术治疗 97 42.92 手术+辅助治疗 72 31.86 手术+辅助+靶向治疗 57 25.22 表 2 不同一般资料卵巢癌患者心理社会适应水平比较(x ±s)
Table 2. Comparison of psychosocial adaptation levels in ovarian cancer patients with different general data(x ±s)
项目 例数 PAIS-SR评分(分) 统计量 P值 年龄 1.911a 0.057 ≤40岁 59 68.67±20.92 >40岁 167 63.22±18.04 文化水平 1.388a 0.167 高中及以下 132 67.48±17.65 大专及以上 94 64.02±19.57 家庭经济状况 1.786a 0.075 < 5 000元 102 68.32±20.09 ≥5 000元 124 64.01±16.18 婚姻状况 1.856a 0.065 有配偶 168 70.15±20.38 无配偶 58 64.72±15.27 工作情况 1.833a 0.068 在职 131 69.07±21.41 非在职 95 63.94±19.86 医疗费用支付方式 0.809a 0.420 医保 148 64.26±18.17 自费 78 66.36±19.28 疾病确诊时间 3.705a < 0.001 ≤1个月 119 72.31±15.92 >1个月 107 63.66±19.15 疾病分期 2.429a 0.016 Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 127 62.38±18.71 Ⅲ~Ⅳ期 99 68.94±21.85 疾病治疗方式 2.100b 0.125 手术 97 62.74±17.52 手术+辅助治疗 72 64.37±20.04 手术+辅助+靶向治疗 57 69.11±19.25 注:a为t值,b为F值。 表 3 卵巢癌患者心理社会适应水平与PTG和自我效能感的关系
Table 3. Relationship between the psychosocial adaptation level of patients with ovarian cancer and PTG and self-efficacy
项目 得分(x±s,分) 相关性 r值 P值 与他人关系 18.45±5.21 -0.503 < 0.001 新的可能性 7.81±1.96 -0.534 < 0.001 个人力量 12.64±3.28 -0.486 < 0.001 精神变化 7.93±2.11 -0.517 < 0.001 对生活的欣赏 11.98±3.07 -0.521 < 0.001 PTGI总分 58.29±15.15 -0.540 < 0.001 采取行动应对疾病 86.43±22.09 -0.563 < 0.001 情绪控制 61.42±17.19 -0.571 < 0.001 人际关系协调 32.84±9.36 -0.565 < 0.001 配合治疗 67.25±20.71 -0.403 < 0.001 癌症自我效能评估量表总分 248.18±57.26 -0.557 < 0.001 MoCA评分 25.14±3.81 0.584 < 0.001 表 4 影响卵巢癌患者心理社会适应水平的多因素分析
Table 4. Multivariate analysis of the psychosocial adaptation level of patients with ovarian cancer
变量 β SE Β’ t值 P值 新的可能性 -2.010 0.454 -1.364 -4.427 < 0.001 对生活的欣赏 -0.929 0.419 -0.781 -2.216 0.028 情绪控制 -1.276 0.591 -1.703 -2.157 0.032 人际关系协调 1.930 0.466 1.104 4.144 < 0.001 MoCA评分 -0.411 0.037 -0.320 -11.148 < 0.001 注:R2=0.741,调整R2=0.545;F=135.620,P<0.001。本表仅列出差异有统计学意义的变量。 -
[1] 首都医科大学肿瘤学系妇科肿瘤学组, 白文佩. 妇科常见恶性肿瘤全专结合管理专家共识[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(8): 911-922.Gynecological Oncology Group, Department of Oncology, Capital Medical University, BAI W P. Expert Consensus on Management of Common Gynecological Malignancies Combining General Practice and Specialist[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(8): 911-922. [2] 杨晓雨, 陈东宇, 王红心, 等. 中国女性卵巢癌流行现状和趋势及预测分析[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2022, 47(9): 1030-1035.YANG X Y, CHEN D Y, WANG H X, et al. Analysis of prevalence, trends and prediction of ovarian cancer among women in China[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2022, 47(9): 1030-1035. [3] 蒋亚萍, 杨宏英, 汪昊涵, 等. 不同肠道手术方式对肠道受侵上皮性卵巢癌患者预后的影响[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2023, 44(1): 85-90.JIANG Y P, YANG H Y, WANG H H, et al. Effect of Different Intestinal Surgical Methods on Prognosis of Patients with Intestinal Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2023, 44(1): 85-90. [4] HASENBURG A, SEHOULI J, FOTOPOULOU C. Peri-operative ovarian cancer guidelines: psycho-oncology[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2022, 32(12): 1626-1628. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003817 [5] HENSON C, TRUCHOT D, CANEVELLO A. Factors that hinder post-traumatic growth: a systematic review[J]. Encephale, 2022, 48(5): 560-562. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2022.02.001 [6] 耿玉芳, 秦如梦, 王慧, 等. 基于诠释性现象学研究的卵巢癌患者创伤后成长经历模型的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 73-78.GENG Y F, QIN R M, WANG H, et al. Construction of post-traumatic growth model of ovarian cancer patients based on interpretative phenomenological analysis[J]. Journal of Nursing (China), 2024, 31(18): 73-78. [7] LEACH C R, HUDSON S V, DIEFENBACH M A, et al. Cancer health self-efficacy improvement in a randomized controlled trial[J]. Cancer, 2022, 128(3): 597-605. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33947 [8] POZZAR R A, XIONG N, MAZZOLA E, et al. Health-related quality of life, patient-centred communication and self-efficacy in ovarian cancer: a mediation analysis[J]. BMJ Support Palliat Care, 2024, 13(e3): e863-e866. [9] 中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会. 卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断与治疗指南(2021年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(6): 490-500.Gynecological Oncology Committee of the China Anti-Cancer Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian malignant tumors (2021 Edition)[J]. China Oncology, 2021, 31(6): 490-500. [10] 国家癌症中心, 国家肿瘤质控中心卵巢癌质控专家委员会. 中国卵巢癌规范诊疗质量控制指标(2022版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2022, 44(7): 609-614.National Cancer Center, Ovarian Cancer Quality Control Expert Committee of National Cancer Quality Control Center. Quality control index for standardized diagnosis and treatment of primary ovarian cancer in China (2022 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2022, 44(7): 609-614. [11] 陈佳增, 翁玲玲, 张馨丹, 等. 自我概念在癌症患者歧视知觉与心理社会适应间的中介效应[J]. 现代预防医学, 2024, 51(17): 3212-3217.CHEN J Z, WENG L L, ZHANG X D, et al. The mediating effect of self-concept on perceived discrimination and psy-chosocial adjustment in cancer patients[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2024, 51(17): 3212-3217. [12] HU R, WANG X, LIU Z, et al. Stigma, depression, and post-traumatic growth among Chinese stroke survivors: a longitudinal study examining patterns and correlations[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2022, 29(1): 16-29. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1864965 [13] WU H J, CHUANG C M, CHIEN C H, et al. Changes in depression and sleep quality and associated factors in women receiving chemotheapy for ovarian cancer: an observational study[J]. Cancer Nurs, 2022, 45(4): 271-279. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000986 [14] 汤观秀, 张秋香, 刘倩, 等. 智能版MoCA评估系统在轻度认知功能障碍诊断中的应用价值研究[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2024, 43(8): 1019-1024.TANG G X, ZHANG Q X, LIU Q, et al. Diagnostic value of mild cognitive dysfunction by the intelligent version of the MoCA system[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics, 2024, 43(8): 1019-1024. [15] JEWETT P I, VOGEL R I, GALCHUTT P, et al. Associations between a sense of connection and existential and psychosocial outcomes in gynecologic and breast cancer survivors[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2022, 30(4): 3329-3336. [16] 廖芳, 李昂, 侯燕, 等. 乳腺癌术后患者心理社会适应水平调查研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2022, 51(11): 1947-1950, 1957.LIAO F, LI A, HOU Y, et al. Survey research on psychosocial adaptation level in postoperative patients with breast cancer[J]. Chongqing Medicine, 2022, 51(11): 1947-1950, 1957. [17] 刘倩, 莫霖, 黄先巧, 等. 治疗期儿童青少年恶性肿瘤患儿社会适应相关因素分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2021, 38(3): 391-395.LIU Q, MO L, HUANG X Q, et al. Analysis of related factors of social adaptation in children and adolescents with malignant tumors during the treatment period[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2021, 38(3): 391-395. [18] 邓杨, 王胜浩, 张媛, 等. 鼻咽癌患者自我效能、生命意义、心理弹性和工作与社会适应障碍的关系[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2022, 22(4): 501-506.DENG Y, WANG S H, ZHANG Y, et al. The relationship between self-efficacy, meaning of life, resilience, and work and social adjustment in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2022, 22(4): 501-506. [19] 沈洁霞, 易娜拉. 拒绝敏感性与青少年社会适应的关系: 情绪调节的中介作用[J]. 心理研究, 2023, 16(6): 570-576.SHEN J X, YI N L. Associations between rejection sensitivity and social adjustment in adolescents: The mediating role of emotion regulation[J]. Psychological Research, 2023, 16(6): 570-576. [20] 盛莹莹, 胡书威, 原小惠, 等. 认知行为疗法对癌症患者的社会支持及应对方式的影响[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(24): 4163-4167.SHENG Y Y, HU S W, YUAN X H, et al. Influence of cognitive behavioral therapy on social support and coping style of cancer patients[J]. Chongqing Medicine, 2020, 49(24): 4163-4167.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 11
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
下载: