Observation on curative effect of Bushen Qiangxin Prescription combined with Dapagliflozin in treating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
-
摘要:
目的 观察补肾强心方联合达格列净治疗射血分数保留型心衰(HFpEF)的疗效,探索中西医结合治疗HFpEF的方法。 方法 将2022年1月—2024年11月就诊于宁国市中医院的70例HFpEF患者按随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,各35例,2组均接受达格列净为主的基础治疗,观察组另给予中药补肾强心方汤剂。4周后比较2组的中医证候积分与总有效率、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、N末端B型脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)及心脏超声参数[左室射血分数(LVEF)、左心房内径(LAD)、左室后壁厚度(LVPW)、E/e’、三尖瓣反流速度峰值(TRV)]。 结果 观察组中医证候总有效率高于对照组(97.1% vs. 68.6%,χ2=10.057,P<0.01);治疗后中医证候积分均下降,6MWD增加, 且观察组优于对照组(P<0.01);NT-proBNP水平下降,组间治疗后比较及差值比较差异均有统计学意义,观察组更优(P<0.01);2组治疗后LVEF增加,E/e'、TRV减少(P<0.01),且观察组的改善幅度均优于对照组(P<0.01);治疗后2组比较LVPW、LAD差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组均无不良反应。 结论 在以达格列净为主的基础上加用补肾强心方治疗HFpEF,能进一步降低NT-proBNP,提高6MWD,更显著地改善中医证候,有助于改善左室舒张功能,且安全性好。 Abstract:Objective To observe the efficacy of Bushen Qiangxin Prescription combined with Dapagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and to explore the treatment of HFpEF with integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine. Methods Seventy patients with HFpEF who were admitted to the Ningguo Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2022 to November 2024 were divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method, with 35 patients in each group. Both groups received basic treatment primarily consisting of Dapagliflozin, and the observation group was additionally given Bushen Qiangxin Prescription. After 4 weeks, the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome score, total effective rate, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide precursor (NT-proBNP), and cardiac ultrasound parameters [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW), E/e', tricuspid regurgitation velocity(TRV)] were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of TCM syndrome in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (97.1% vs. 68.6%, χ2=10.057, P < 0.01), the TCM pattern score decreased after treatment, and the 6MWD increased, and the observation group was better than the control group (P < 0.01); the level of NT-proBNP decreased, and the value and difference between the two groups were statistically significant after treatment, and the observation group was better (P < 0.01); the two groups had an increase in LVEF and a decrease in E/e' and TRV (P < 0.01), and the magnitude of improvement in the observation group was greater than that in the control group (P < 0.01), and there was no significant difference in LVPW and LAD between the two groups after treatment (P>0.05). No adverse reactions were observed in either group. Conclusion The addition of Bushen Qiangxin Prescription in the treatment of HFpEF based on Dapagliflozin can further reduce NT-proBNP, increase 6MWD, significantly improve TCM syndrome, and help improve left ventricular diastolic function, with good safety. -
表 1 2组HFpEF患者中医证候总有效率比较[例(%)]
Table 1. Comparison of TCM syndrome response rates between the two groups of HfpEF patients [cases (%)]
组别 例数 显效 有效 无效 总有效 观察组 35 4(11.4) 30(85.7) 1(2.9) 34(97.1) 对照组 35 2(5.7) 22(62.9) 11(31.4) 24(68.6) 注:2组总有效率比较,χ2=10.057,P < 0.001。 表 2 2组HFpEF患者治疗前后中医证候积分比较(x±s,分)
Table 2. Comparison of TCM pattern scores before and after treatment between the two groups of HfpEF patients (x±s)
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗后 t值 P值 观察组 35 23.20±4.04 10.80±3.33 17.037 <0.001 对照组 35 22.29±3.85 14.69±3.53 12.229 <0.001 统计量 0.969a 31.245b P值 0.336 <0.001 注:a为t值,b为F值。 表 3 2组HFpEF患者治疗前后6MWD比较(x±s,m)
Table 3. Comparison of 6-minute walking distance before and after treatment between the two groups of HfpEF patients (x±s, m)
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗后 t值 P值 观察组 35 272.20±54.66 360.09±60.39 16.598 <0.001 对照组 35 271.80±61.29 323.37±58.96 11.195 <0.001 统计量 0.029a 27.508b P值 0.977 <0.001 注:a为t值,b为F值。 表 4 2组HFpEF患者治疗前后NT-proBNP比较[M(P25, P75),pg/mL]
Table 4. Comparison of NT-proBNP before and after treatment between the two groups of HfpEF patients [M(P25, P75), pg/mL]
组别 例数 治疗前 治疗后 差值 观察组 35 1 670(1 192,2 119) 778(510,1 100) 523(350,928) 对照组 35 1 760(1 157,3 084) 1 200(813,2 156) 862(667,1 132) Z值 -0.258 -3.213 2.737 P值 0.796 0.001 0.006 表 5 2组HFpEF患者治疗前后心脏超声参数比较(x±s)
Table 5. Comparison of cardiac ultrasound parameters before and after treatment between the two groups of HfpEF patients (x±s)
组别 例数 LVEF(%) t值 P值 LAD(mm) t值 P值 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 35 59.91±6.59 65.00±5.03 8.507 <0.001 45.17±5.90 40.71±4.36 6.970 <0.001 对照组 35 60.33±6.72 61.84±5.93 5.215 <0.001 44.86±7.59 39.94±8.77 5.569 <0.001 统计量 0.260a 41.138b 0.847a 0.249b P值 0.795 <0.001 0.931 0.619 组别 例数 E/e’ t值 P值 TRV(m/s) t值 P值 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 观察组 35 13.66±0.92 9.84±0.94 36.058 <0.001 3.23±0.31 3.23±0.31 19.556 <0.001 对照组 35 13.47±1.54 11.24±1.18 16.187 <0.001 3.21±0.26 2.19±0.34 15.412 <0.001 统计量 0.648a 109.672b 0.335a 39.626b P值 0.519 <0.001 0.739 <0.001 注:a为t值,b为F值。 表 6 2组HFpEF患者治疗前后LVPW比较[M(P25, P75),mm]
Table 6. Comparison of LVPW before and after treatment between the two groups of HfpEF patients [M(P25, P75), mm]
组别 治疗前 治疗后 差值 观察组 10(9, 12) 10(9, 11) 1(0, 1) 对照组 11(9, 12) 10(9, 11) 1(0, 1) Z值 -0.214 -1.075 -1.387 P值 0.830 0.282 0.166 -
[1] 射血分数保留的心力衰竭诊断与治疗中国专家共识制定工作组. 射血分数保留的心力衰竭诊断与治疗中国专家共识2023[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2023, 38(4): 375-379.Chinese Expert Consensus Working Group on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Chinese expert consensus 2023[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2023, 38(4): 375-379. [2] 陈康玉, 严激. 安徽多中心前瞻性心力衰竭队列基线分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 22(1): 14-17. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002265CHEN K Y, YAN J. Baseline analysis of a multicenter prospective heart-failure cohort in Anhui Province[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 22(1): 14-17. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002265 [3] 崔晓通, 王鹏, 金雪娟, 等. 中国不同射血分数亚型心力衰竭住院患者临床特征分析[J]. 中国临床医学, 2023, 30(10): 759-762.CUI X T, WANG P, JIN X J, et al. Clinical characteristics of hospitalized heart failure patients with different ejection fraction in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2023, 30(10): 759-762. [4] 刘博, 李玉豆, 李本志, 等. 基于"大气下陷"理论探讨慢性心力衰竭的病机与辨治[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2024, 30(11): 1947-1950.LIU B, LI Y D, LI B Z, et al. Based on the "atmospheric depression" theory, exploring the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic heart failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Basic Medicine in Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2024, 30(11): 1947-1950. [5] 郭红鑫, 王建茹, 王新陆, 等. 中药治疗射血分数保留心衰的核心用药及其作用机制研究[J]. 中草药, 2023, 54(18): 6017-6028.GUO H X, WANG J R, WANG X L, et al. Study on core medication of traditional Chinese medicine in treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its mechanism[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2023, 54(18): 6017-6028. [6] 中华医学会心血管病分会心力衰竭学组, 中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2018[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2018, 46(10): 760-789.Heart Failure Group of the Cardiovascular Disease Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, Heart Failure Professional Committee of the Chinese Medical Association, and Editorial Committee of the Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Disease. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2018, 46(10): 760-789. [7] 中国心衰中心联盟. 舒张性心力衰竭早期防治专家建议[J]. 临床心血管杂志, 2021, 37(1): 1-6.Chinese Heart Failure Center Alliance. Expert advice on early prevention and treatment of diastolic heart failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Cardiology, 2021, 37(1): 1-6. [8] 郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2002: 77-85.ZHENG X Y. Guiding principles for clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine new drugs[M]. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press, 2002: 77-85. [9] 中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会, 中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会, 等. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2024[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2024, 52(3): 235-275.Chinese Medical Association Cardiovascular Disease Branch, Chinese Medical Association Cardiovascular Physicians Branch, Chinese Medical Association Heart Failure Professional Committee, et al. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2024[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2024, 52(3): 235-275. [10] 魏明明, 宋欣瑜, 任耀龙, 等. 钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂在心力衰竭临床治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中国医药, 2022, 17(7): 1095-1099.WEI M M, SONG X Y, REN Y L, et al. Research progress of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in clinical treatment of heart failure[J]. China Medicine, 2022, 17(7): 1095-1099. [11] MASON T, COELHO-FILHO O R, VERMA S, et al. Empagliflozin reduces myocardial extracellular volume in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2021, 14(6): 1164-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.10.017 [12] 储美丽, 童孝磊, 李绍敏. 李绍敏补肾强心法治疗心衰病的辨证思路与诊治经验[J]. 中医药临床杂志, 2023, 35(5): 886-890.CHU M L, TONG X L, LI S M. LI Shaomin's dialectical thinking and experience in the treatment of heart failure with the method of "Tonifying the Kidney and Strengthening the Heart"[J]. Clinical Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023, 35(5): 886-890. [13] 贺文超, 朱慕诚, 苏全斌, 等. 基于潜在类别分析对使用ARNI的HFpEF患者临床特征及预后影响因素研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(1): 59-64.HE W C, ZHU M C, SU Q B, et al. A study on clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of HFpEF patients using ARNI based on latent class analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(1): 59-64. [14] 崔泽岩, 孙倩, 周红霞. 血清糖类抗原125和N末端B型脑钠肽前体对射血分数保留的心力衰竭的诊断与疗效判定及预后的评估价值[J]. 中国医药, 2021, 16(4): 503-507.CUI Z Y, SUN Q, ZHOU H X. Evaluation of serum carbohydrate antigen 125 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in diagnosis, efficacy judgment and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction[J]. Chinese Medicine, 2021, 16(4): 503-507. [15] 吴立华, 刘倩, 高丽娜, 等. NT-proBNP评估射血分数保留心力衰竭病人病情及预后的临床研究[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2019, 17(11): 1688-1690.WU L H, LIU Q, GAO L N, et al. Clinical study on NT proBNP evaluation of ejection fraction preservation and prognosis in patients with heart failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease, 2019, 17(11): 1688-1690. [16] 储午阳, 彭杰成, 邵平, 等. 糖尿病对老年射血分数保留心力衰竭患者预后的影响及预后预测模型构建[J]. 中国临床研究, 2025, 38(4): 554-557, 562.CHU W Y, PENG J C, SHAO P, et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on prognosis of elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and construction of prognosis prediction model[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Research, 2025, 38(4): 554-557, 562. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 7
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
下载: