Analysis of the cognition and clinical practice about edema-related medically unspecified disease of general practitioners in China
-
摘要:
目的 调查全科医师对水肿型未分化疾病认知和临床实践情况,为提升其规范诊治水平提供参考依据。 方法 选取2025年1月10—24日自愿参加的419名全科医师作为调查对象。通过问卷星进行线上问卷调查。 结果 21.0%(88/419)的全科医师开设未分化疾病/水肿门诊,62.8%(263/419)经常遇到水肿患者(≥1例/周),96.4%(404/419)认为水肿需要积极干预,28.2%(118/419)参加过水肿培训,95.9%(402/419)认为需要水肿指南或共识,96.7%(405/419)认为需要开展水肿培训。年龄大、职称高、学历高、三级医院的全科医师所遇到水肿病例更多(χ2=8.663、20.537、31.440、49.080,P=0.013、<0.001、<0.001、<0.001),职称高、年龄大者更关注和提供心理支持(χ2=8.937、10.033,P=0.011、0.007),职称高者更经常随访和评估(χ2=11.894,P=0.003),而全科医师对水肿指南或共识以及培训需求差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 国内水肿门诊开诊率低,全科医师对水肿的认知和临床实践有差异,水肿培训不足,但需求高,今后可通过开展水肿门诊和加强培训提升其诊治能力。 Abstract:Objective To investigate general practitioners ' (GPs) cognition and clinical practice regarding edema-related medically unspecified disease (MUD), providing reference for improving standardized diagnosis and treatment. Methods A total of 419 general practitioners who voluntarily participated from January 10th to 24th, 2025 were selected as the survey subjects. An online questionnaire survey was conducted through Wenjuanxing. Results Only 21.0% (88/419) of GPs had established edema clinics, 62.8% (263/419) frequently encountered edema patients, 96.4% (404/419) emphasized the necessity of active intervention for edema, 28.2% (118/419) had attended edema-related academic conferences, 95.9% (402/419) demanded standardized guidelines, and 96.7% (405/419) advocated for training. GPs with older age, higher title, higher education, or working in tertiary hospitals managed more edema cases (χ2=8.663, 20.537, 31.440, 49.080; P=0.013, < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001). GPs with higher title, older age, or longer experience provided more psychological support (χ2=8.937, 10.033, P=0.011, 0.007). Higher title correlated with more frequent follow-ups and assessments (χ2=11.894, P=0.003). No significant differences in guideline awareness or training needs were observed (P>0.05). Conclusion Low edema clinic establishment rates and disparities in edema cognition among GPs. Despite high training demands, current training is insufficient. Future strategies should prioritize edema clinic development and targeted training programs to enhance GPs ' diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities. -
Key words:
- General practitioners /
- Edema /
- Medically unspecified disease /
- Cognition /
- Clinical practice
-
表 1 419名全科医师的基本资料
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the 419 general practitioners
项目 分类 人数(%) 性别 女性 250(59.7) 男性 169(40.3) 职称 高级职称 114(27.2) 中级职称 130(31.0) 初级职称 175(41.8) 年龄 ≤30岁 162(38.7) 31~50 205(48.9) >50岁 52(12.4) 学历 本科及以下 321(76.6) 硕士及以上 98(23.4) 医院类别 一级医院 235(56.1) 二级医院 34(8.1) 三级医院 150(35.8) 表 2 对不同年龄和性别水肿可能病因的选择[人(%)]
Table 2. Possible causes of edema categorized by age and sex [case(%)]
项目 老年男性 老年女性 中青年男性 中青年女性 χ2值 P值 心源性、肝源性、肾源性疾病 407(97.1) 347(82.8) 258(61.6) 220(52.5) 70.019 <0.001 内分泌系统疾病 304(72.6) 384(91.6) 260(62.1) 345(82.3) 26.403 <0.001 心理社会因素 124(29.6) 166(39.6) 151(36.0) 200(47.7) 18.800 <0.001 营养不良 266(63.5) 243(58.0) 128(30.5) 165(39.4) 62.908 <0.001 特发性水肿 217(51.8) 247(58.9) 200(47.7) 246(58.7) 6.985 0.072 药物性水肿 278(66.3) 229(54.7) 157(37.5) 147(35.1) 56.980 <0.001 功能性水肿 366(87.4) 356(85.0) 254(60.6) 295(70.4) 26.350 <0.001 血管疾病(如静脉曲张、静脉血栓等) 327(78.0) 272(64.9) 181(43.2) 161(38.4) 77.470 <0.001 肿瘤 274(65.4) 235(56.1) 123(29.4) 109(26.0) 108.182 <0.001 局部性水肿(如局部炎症、淋巴管炎、丹毒、过敏等) 273(65.2) 238(56.8) 235(56.1) 212(50.6) 7.937 0.047 遗传性血管性水肿 140(33.4) 129(30.8) 152(36.3) 134(32.0) 2.124 0.547 其他 19(4.5) 14(3.3) 13(3.1) 17(4.1) 1.444 0.695 χ2值 526.954 485.508 324.943 440.023 P值 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 表 3 对不同年龄水肿患者辅助检查的选择[人(%)]
Table 3. Diagnostic test preferences for edema management across age cohorts[case(%)]
项目 老年 中青年 χ2值 P值 脑钠肽 327(78.0) 153(36.5) 63.075 <0.001 肝肾功能、尿常规、血常规等 407(97.1) 388(92.6) 0.454 0.500 甲状腺功能 326(77.8) 354(84.5) 1.153 0.283 D-二聚体 286(68.3) 173(41.3) 27.819 <0.001 补体C4等 109(26.0) 130(31.0) 1.845 0.174 下肢血管彩超 361(86.2) 247(58.9) 21.375 <0.001 心脏彩超 346(82.6) 205(48.9) 36.082 <0.001 泌尿系彩超 235(56.1) 213(50.8) 1.080 0.299 肿瘤标志物 216(51.6) 127(30.3) 23.093 <0.001 垂体及性腺激素 131(31.3) 193(46.1) 11.864 <0.001 抗核抗体谱 109(26.0) 139(33.2) 3.629 0.057 胸部X线或CT 169(40.3) 131(31.3) 4.813 0.028 心理量表测试 73(17.4) 100(23.9) 4.214 0.040 其他 10(2.4) 9(2.1) 0.053 0.819 χ2值 710.188 686.317 P值 <0.001 <0.001 表 4 不同特征全科医师对水肿型MUD临床实践比较[人(%)]
Table 4. Comparison of cognition and clinical practices regarding edema-related medically unspecified conditions among general practitioners with different characteristics[case(%)]
项目 经常遇到水肿(≥1次/周) 经常随访和评估 需要住院治疗 关注和提供心理支持 职称 高级职称 87(76.3) 73(64.0) 36(31.6) 87(76.3) 中级职称 87(66.9) 55(42.3) 55(42.3) 79(60.8) 初级职称 89(50.9) 97(55.4) 109(62.3) 106(60.6) χ2值 20.537 11.894 28.313 8.937 P值 <0.001 0.003 <0.001 0.011 年龄 ≤30岁 88(54.3) 91(56.2) 102(63.0) 95(58.6) 31~50岁 142(69.3) 100(48.8) 84(41.0) 134(65.4) >50岁 33(63.5) 34(65.4) 14(26.9) 43(82.7) χ2值 8.663 5.249 27.840 10.033 P值 0.013 0.072 <0.001 0.007 学历 本科及以下 178(55.5) 174(54.2) 166(51.7) 206(64.2) 硕士及以上 85(86.7) 51(52.0) 34(34.7) 66(67.3) χ2值 31.440 0.142 8.717 0.332 P值 <0.001 0.707 0.003 0.565 医院级别 一级医院 116(49.4) 128(54.5) 115(48.9) 154(65.5) 二级医院 20(58.8) 19(55.9) 18(52.9) 19(55.9) 三级医院 127(84.7) 78(52.0) 67(44.7) 99(66.0) χ2值 49.080 0.295 1.071 1.335 P值 <0.001 0.863 0.585 0.513 项目 参加水肿培训 需要建立水肿门诊 需要水肿指南或共识 需要开展水肿培训 职称 高级职称 46(40.4) 106(93) 110(96.5) 111(97.4) 中级职称 37(28.5) 112(86.2) 125(96.2) 124(95.4) 初级职称 35(20.0) 157(89.7) 167(95.4) 170(97.1) χ2值 14.140 3.028 0.222 P值 <0.001 0.220 0.895 0.655a 年龄 ≤30岁 37(22.8) 144(88.9) 156(96.3) 159(98.1) 31~50岁 62(30.2) 181(88.3) 195(95.1) 194(94.6) >50岁 19(36.5) 50(96.2) 51(98.1) 52(100.0) χ2值 4.511 2.832 1.015 P值 0.105 0.243 0.602 0.084a 学历 本科及以下 87(27.1) 287(89.4) 307(95.6) 311(96.9) 硕士及以上 31(31.6) 88(89.8) 95(96.9) 94(95.9) χ2值 0.761 0.012 P值 0.383 0.913 0.772a 0.748a 医院级别 一级医院 66(28.1) 209(88.9) 228(97.0) 227(96.6) 二级医院 8(23.5) 32(94.1) 32(94.1) 32(94.1) 三级医院 44(29.3) 134(89.3) 142(94.7) 146(97.3) χ2值 0.463 0.855 1.621 0.894 P值 0.793 0.652 0.445 0.640 注:a为采用Fisher精确检验。 -
[1] 娄铮, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 县级综合医院普通内科门诊未分化疾病就诊情况分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(31): 3945-3950.LOU Z, LIU Y, REN J J. Visits for medically unspecified disease in general internal medicine clinics of county general hospitals[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(31): 3945-3950. [2] KOIRAL A, POURAFSHAR N, DANESHMAND A, et al. Etiology and management of edema: a review[J]. Adv Kidney Dis Health, 2023, 30(2): 110-123. doi: 10.1053/j.akdh.2022.12.002 [3] 王剑强. 未分化疾病的全科诊疗思维与策略[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(3): 485-489. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002913WANG J Q. General practice thinking and strategy of diagnosis and treatment of undifferentiated diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(3): 485-489. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002913 [4] 张含之, 韩一平, 金花, 等. 社区全科医生对门诊未分化疾病的诊治现况及城郊对比研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(7): 855-863.ZHANG H Z, HAN Y P, JIN H, et al. Overall status and urban-suburban comparative analysis of outpatient management of undifferentiated diseases by community general practitioners[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(7): 855-863. [5] 娄铮, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 浙江省全科医生对未分化疾病诊治的观点研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(2): 321-325.LOU Z, LIU Y, REN J J. A study of the opinions of general practitioners in Zhejiang Province on the diagnosis and treatment of medically unspecified disease[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(2): 321-325. [6] 吴新校, 杨凯超, 吴伟东. 三级综合性医院全科门诊水肿患者就诊情况研究[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2020, 18(10): 931-932.WU X J, YANG K Y, WU W D. Study on the consultation status of edema patients in general outpatient clinics of tertiary comprehensive hospitals[J]. Clinical and Education in General Practice, 2020, 18(10): 931-932. [7] 付佳华, 宋洁, 邱强. 肾内科门诊患者水肿原因分析[J]. 国际移植与血液净化杂志, 2024, 22(4): 44-45.FU G H, SONG J, QIU Q. Analysis of the causes of edema in nephrology outpatients[J]. International Journal of Transplantation and Blood Purification, 2024, 22(4): 44-45. [8] DAI M, NAKAGAMI G, SUGAMA J, et al. The prevalence and functional impact of chronic edema and lymphedema in Japan: LIMPRINT study[J]. Lymphat Res Biol, 2019, 17(2): 195-201. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0080 [9] GIBSON L, MOFFATT C J, NARAHARI S R, et al. Global knowledge gaps in equitable delivery of chronic edema care: a political economy case study analysis[J]. Lymphat Res Biol, 2021, 19(5): 447-459. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0063 [10] 赵稳稳, 王荣英, 张金佳, 等. 未分化疾病患者在综合医院全科与专科就诊情况对比研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(1): 20-23.ZHAO W W, WANG R Y, ZHANG J J, et al. Comparative study on visit status of patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms from general practice ward and specialist ward in general hospitals[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2019, 22(1): 20-23. [11] 朱佳宏, 任菁菁, 马云笛, 等. 我国未分化疾病门诊开展的现况调查与分析[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2024, 22(12): 1062-1066, 1082.ZHU H J, REN J J, MA Y D, et al. A survey of the current status of medically unspecified diseases clinics in China[J]. Clinical and Education in General Practice, 2024, 22(12): 1062-1066, 1082. [12] BURIAN E A, KARLSMARK T, FRANKS P J, et al. Cellulitis in chronic oedema of the lower leg: an international cross-sectional study[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2021, 185(1): 110-118. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19803 [13] 徐佳玙, 朱兰. 社区全科医师如何早期识别与长程管理未分化疾病?[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(31): 3881-3882.XU J Y, ZHU L. How can early identify and manage over the long term to medically unspecified disease for community general practitioners?[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2023, 26(31): 3881-3882. [14] 娄铮, 刘颖, 邵双阳, 等. 未分化性疾患(未分化疾病)的研究进展[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2021, 19(7): 636-639.LOU Z, LIU Y, SHAO S Y, et al. Research Progress on medically unspecified disease[J]. Clinical and Education in General Practice, 2021, 19(7): 636-639. [15] MAISEL P, BAUM E, DONNER-BANZHOFF N. Fatigue as the chief complaint-epidemiology, causes, diagnosis and treatment[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2021, 118(33-34): 566-576. [16] 杨燕青, 陶莹, 李达, 等. 心身医学在全科实践中的作用思考[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(6): 998-1001.YANG Y Q, TAO Y, LI D, et al. Thoughts on the role of psychosomatic medicine in general practice[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(6): 998-1001. [17] 庞姝, 刁洋, 陈祥雪, 等. 未分化疾病面临的挑战及对策[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0153.PANG S, DIAO Y, CHEN X X, et al. Challenges and countermeasures faced by undifferentiated diseases[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2024. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2024.0153. [18] 中国医师协会变态反应医师分会, 中华医学会变态反应学分会, 中国罕见病联盟北京罕见病诊疗与保障学会变态反应学分会, 等. 中国遗传性血管性水肿诊断与治疗专家共识(2024版)[J]. 中华临床免疫和变态反应杂志, 2025, 19(1): 1-10.Allergy Physician Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Chinese Society of Allergology of Chinese Medical Association, Allergy Society of Beijing Rare Disease Diagnosis, Treatment and Security Association under China Rare Disease Alliance, et al. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema (2024 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, 2025, 19(1): 1-10. [19] 张帅帅, 任菁菁, 邱艳. 水肿的全科诊疗思路[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2023, 22(7): 767-772.ZHANG S S, REN J J, QIU Y. Approach of diagnosis and treatment of edema from the perspective of general practice[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practitioners, 2023, 22(7): 767-772. [20] 叶康丽, 徐志杰, 杜亚平, 等. 应对未分化疾病: 从过度诊断走向医患共同决策[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(36): 4541-4547.YE K L, XU Z J, DU Y P, et al. Coping with undifferentiated diseases: from over-diagnosis to shared decision making[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2020, 23(36): 4541-4547. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 3
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
下载: